Why is this Atheist soooooooooooooooooo angry???

Why is this Atheist soooooooooooooooooo angry???

we2bare2batheism-9665316

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help out. Here is my donate/paypal page.

Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Twitter
page
, on my Facebook page, on my Google+ page and/or the “Share/Save” button below the tags.

Are atheist activists gaining ground on college campuses?, Part 1 of 9

Some time ago, an article was published to report that Atheism Groups Grow on College Campuses. Let us consider some of the key issues:
The sign sits propped on a wooden chair, inviting all comers: “Ask an Atheist.”
Whenever a student gets within a few feet, Anastasia Bodnar waves and smiles, trying to make a good first impression…Bodnar is the happy face of atheism at Iowa State University…Bodnar, president of the ISU Atheist and Agnostic Society [which consisted of some 30 members at the time]. “People assume we’re rabble-rousing, when we’re one of the gentlest groups on campus.”
Find this whole series here.

Sadly, the report does not state what is being asked of the atheists. The reference to “waves and smiles, trying to make a good first impression…the happy face of atheism” is very, very noteworthy. This is because, as has been chronicled in the past (see Atheism’s Public Relations Problems) many atheist groups put for a waving, smiling, good impression happy fact as a PR façade for their anti-Christian support groups. In the last segments of this series we will specifically consider whether the ISU Atheist and Agnostic Society are the sort who play the PR game or not.
Also noteworthy is a typical atheist move: taking moral stances without having a moral premise upon which to take the stance (except when they plagiaristically borrow from Judeo-Christian morality). For some reason some concern is expressed in being viewed as being gentle, but why?

…campus atheists and agnostics are coming out of the closet, fueling a sharp rise in the number of clubs…providing the atheist movement new training grounds for future leaders…at least three universities, including Harvard, now have humanist chaplains meeting the needs of the not-so-spiritual…As teenagers move into young adulthood, some leave God behind…

Lyz Liddell, senior campus organizer for the Columbus, Ohio-based group.
“College students can be a little more susceptible to the more reactionary anti-religion voices, partly because it’s so new to them.”

The last sentence gets close to the reason why atheism groups grow on college campuses. In the incomparable words of Vox Day, who was referencing Richard DawkinsOut Campaign, a conversion crusade by any other name,
It’s like the Campus Crusade for Cthulhu, only sillier.

The issue is that rebellion loves company. One reason that atheists are so active on college campus is that, in essence, they act like a styled version of temple prostitutes. Temple prostitutes (who are alive and well within certain witchcraft / magik groups) entice unbelievers via sexual enticements as their worship systems include sexual practices. The youth are naturally rebellious, saturated with raging hormones, have just been freed of mommy’s apron strings (but not her purse) and are thrown into co-ed circumstances.

motivational20poster2c20secular2c20atheism2c20new20atheists-2181162
You can purchase this design on a shirt, sticker, etc. at this link

Along come the atheists who encourage the confusion between rebelling against religion with rebelling against God. They then deny any such thing as traditional ethics / morals and the rest is pop-cultural history (enter STDs, single teen moms, emotional damage from being treated as a sexual object de jour, children living out of a suitcase as they are shuffled between feuding un-married parents, etc., etc., etc.).

Why do you think that atheist make besmirching Christian values a large portion of their atheistic worldviews (even whilst borrowing from Christian values in a plagiaristic manner)? Keep in mind that two of atheism’s consoling delusions are absolute autonomy and that which follows from it, lack of ultimate accountability.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help. Here is my donate/paypal page.

Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Facebook page and/or on my Google+ page. You can also use the “Share / Save” button below this post.

bloodlines

Social networks:
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Archive video site
Ken Ammi’s Product Reviews
My CafePress shop
Google +

Norm Geisler references TrueFreethinker.com:
Apologeticspress.com’s Kyle Butt references TrueFreethinker.com:

Read the article about which Gary Habermas, PhD (Distinguished Research Professor & Chair of the Department of Philosophy at Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary) said, “I have hung on to it since you sent it, & plan to keep doing so”: Historical Jesus – Two Centuries Worth of Citations.

atheist20nothing-cam-1975909

Prophetic Revelation’s Richard Gan on serpent seed and original sin

rev-20richard20gan20serpent20seed20of20satan-9071764
…the doctrine of the Serpent Seed
(or the doctrine of the Original Sin) is neither an allegory, a myth, a legend,

nor a fable, but is based on literal historical facts…

—Richard Gan

Under review is Rev. Richard Gan’s article The Doctrine of the Serpent Seed and The Doctrine of the Original Sin… which derives from his 1998 AD book, “The Serpent Seed THE ORIGINAL SIN.” You can find the whole series here.

As with most serpent seedline of Satan theorists he claims to have received personal private revelation from God, “I was led to the light of the revelation of God’s Word in 1971.” In keeping with such a high prophetic view of themselves they also look down on, in a manner of speaking, those who deny their theory, “The average denominational Christians generally lack spiritual interest…lack the spiritual insight of the Word of God.” He also wrote, “The carnal minded people” which is in reference to they who reject his serpent seed theory “always give the Bible their carnal interpretations based on personal opinion, church theology, traditions of man, or “my church teaches some other way”. To understand the mystery of God’s Word we have to put away such childish attitudes, and be mature and learn wisely.” He also writes that “Traditional theology has so numbed the minds of people” and refers to “‘churchylogy’ nonsense.”

Thus, they claim to have uncovered and ancient mystery, “When you have understood this doctrine of the Original Sin, you will then truly appreciate why Jesus Christ had to be VIRGIN BORN and why He had to shed His Own Precious BLOOD to save us from eternal damnation” (emphasis in original: in fact, his text is peppered with emphasis and so all emphasis which follows is within the original).
This is a typical pattern repeated time and again as I noted most succinctly in Serpent Seedline of Satan Neo-Gnosticism.

Also, many some serpent seed of Satan theorists, such as Richard Gan, trace their theory’s lineage to he about whom Gan writes of as a prophet, “There is no doubt that Bro. William M. Branham had preached all his messages correctly. But many of his followers would lift the prophet so high up that they would take every word that he uttered as literally God’s spoken word, even taking all his sermons to be the Third Testament” (see On William Branham’s sermon “The Serpent’s Seed”). Some such as Gan do this knowingly and yet others surely derive info from Branham without acknowledging it or perhaps without knowing it as quotations become paraphrased without citations.

Image from Richard Gan’s article/book

Richard Gan tells us, “the doctrine of the Serpent Seed (or the doctrine of the Original Sin) is neither an allegory, a myth, a legend, nor a fable, but is based on literal historical facts set forth and emphasized by the use of certain particular expressions or figures of speech” (emphasis in original). Note two things straight away: he equates the serpent seed theory with the doctrine of original sin which may make for quite a bit of confusion and which may end up meaning that if we discredit the former we will be viewed as seeking to discredit the latter. Of course, his claim is that the original sin was the serpent seed: Eve having sex with a serpent. Also, we see his approach instantly as he is claiming that the theory is factual.

He begins by quoting Genesis 3:14-15 and emphasizing the terms, “Serpent” and with reference to the serpent, “thy seed.”
He make an interesting statement in that “like the angels he was created in the image and likeness of God.” The Bible never actually states that Angels were created in God’s image but it is a reasonable conclusion since Angels look like human males with no wings nor halos (Cherubim and Seraphim are a different story as they are different categories of being).

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help. Here is my donate/paypal page.

Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Facebook page and/or on my Google+ page.

Twitter: #Serpentseed, #RichardGan, #Seedlines
Facebook: #Serpentseed, #RichardGan, #Seedlines

I. B. Pranaitis

Social networks:
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Archive video site
Ken Ammi’s Product Reviews
My CafePress shop
Google +

Norm Geisler references TrueFreethinker.com:
Apologeticspress.com’s Kyle Butt references TrueFreethinker.com:

Read the article about which Gary Habermas, PhD (Distinguished Research Professor & Chair of the Department of Philosophy at Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary) said, “I have hung on to it since you sent it, & plan to keep doing so”: Historical Jesus – Two Centuries Worth of Citations.

atheist20nothing-cam-9503442

seed of Satan

We have been considering a key text of serpent seed of Satan theorists, Genesis 4:1, and in the first segment reviewed the Targum Onkelos, Syriac Bible-Peshitta, an Aramaic Bible and the Septuagint / LXX.

Now to the Targum which serpent seed of Satan theorist Zen Garcia claims, on his own un-evidenced authority, is the original text of Genesis. It is the Targum of Jonathan ben Uzziel more accurately Pseudo-Jonathan which dates to the 600s AD and which has the 4:1 verse as:

entities

Herein we continue, from part 1, part 2, part 3, considering info on Angels in Athanasius of Alexandria (296-373 AD). The fuller complete result consists of quotations of those sections within the text that refer to Angels, Cherubim, Seraphim, Devil, Satan, demons, serpent and dragon.

Generation Sociopath

For some reason our culture has taken to naming its generations, much like it does with hurricanes; the Greatest Generation, the Me Generation, the Baby Boomers, the Millennials, etc.

It would seem that a good name for the up and coming generation is Generation Sociopath which can very well be aka Generation Monosyllabic Mouth Breather.

A generalized sketch of a typical modern day kid is something to the likes of the description which follows.

If mom and dad were ever even married, they are now divorced and exhibit the feuds that come therewith.

The kid is made to live out of a suitcase as they are shuffled around town if not from city to city or state to state. Some “parents” think that parenting is “seeing” their kid for a few hours, once per week. Others think that parenting is signing a child support check.

Meanwhile, mom and dad are “dating” which means having unmarried sex with the tentative partner de jour. These people, who come and go, are experimented with to see “how he/she does with kids.”

The result of this is that the kid is drawn, torn, confused and frustrated due to love for mom and dad but having to deal with their bickering and being used as a pawn. As for the sex partners de jour; the kid learns to not build deep emotional relationships because they, very quickly, learn that just as soon as they get close to someone, they are gone and replaced with someone else; keep people at bay and replace them at will is the lesson—a lesson, by the way, that is not learned by being taught with speech but by experience, painful experience. This results in shallow emotions which are the seeds of sociopath.

Moreover, the parents justify all that they do and ensure that kid that divorce, breaking up a family, having a latchkey kid who lives out of a suitcase, having unmarried sex with as many temporary sexual partners de jour, etc. are all perfectly acceptable. This results in an ethically bankrupt kid.

Well, what single parent wants to “deal with” a naturally energy filled kid? Thus, the slightest hint at lack of attention span or hyperactivity (as in not having to sit on a couch all night) the kid will be forced to take drugs. This often leads to a cascade of pharmaceuticals as one leads to lack of sleep, the one that helps with sleep makes them drowsy whist awake, the one to deal with drowsiness has other side effects and on it goes.

Many kids are on such hardcore drugs at such early ages that they literally never develop an appropriately functioning central nervous system as the drugs literally take aim at their very core of whom they are or could otherwise be.

This results in a view of life whereby all problems can be dealt with via a drug; a drug to fall asleep, a drug to wake up, a drug to calm down, a drug to get energy, a drug to lose weight, etc.

Emotions are cloudy at best and are spiked with the artificial high, as it were.

The kid attends a public school which sees them as accidents of haphazard evolution to be corralled, controlled and indoctrinated. They are said to socialize which does not result from being taught manners, ethics, etc. but being let out to run wild and hope to survive as the fittest in a “Lord of the Flies” style. References to God are virtually illegal and so those ethics which have founded and maintained nations have been broken down to “that’s not okay.”

The kid lives in an artificial world, much of their own making, which flickers between TV and social networking with all that comes with. Online personalities are just characters in a great play and if the kid tires of the juggler, they can simply be un-liked, un-followed, un-friended, reported as spam, etc. all at the click of a mouse. The manner whereby they learned to deal with real life human beings standing right in front of them is carried over with high speed efficiency to the online world; what a tangled world wide web we weave.

All of this, and much, much more, results in a generation who have shallow emotions. Yet, it is upon these emotions that they rely as their cognitive faculties are even less developed. Thus, they rely on shallow emotions in order to make decisions which results in faulty views and actions; failed worldviews.

Worst of all; it is not entirely their fault as they have been groomed to be as such and the effort to correct their little worlds may be too much for them.

Let us conclude with an example, hopefully a very extreme one, from an episode of Cops.

Cops were called to an apartment due to a fight. The occupants of the apartment are a mom with two kids, her current boyfriend and her ex-boyfriend. So, dad or the dads are out of the picture and the kids live with the ex-boyfriend (who has them call him “Dad”) and the new boyfriend.

So, real dad or dads are nowhere to be found, current “Dad” is no longer intimate with mom, but a new guy is.

This may be an extreme example but it is a true, actual, real life example; real life kids are dealing with this situation.

All of this, and so much more, lead to Generation Sociopath.

Genesis 3

Social networks:
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Archive video site
Ken Ammi’s Product Reviews
My CafePress shop
Google +

Norm Geisler references TrueFreethinker.com:
Apologeticspress.com’s Kyle Butt references TrueFreethinker.com:

Read the article about which Gary Habermas, PhD (Distinguished Research Professor & Chair of the Department of Philosophy at Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary) said, “I have hung on to it since you sent it, & plan to keep doing so”: Historical Jesus – Two Centuries Worth of Citations.

atheist20nothing-cam-2643892

Bob Schlenker

Social networks:
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Archive video site
Ken Ammi’s Product Reviews
My CafePress shop
Google +

Norm Geisler references TrueFreethinker.com:
Apologeticspress.com’s Kyle Butt references TrueFreethinker.com:

Read the article about which Gary Habermas, PhD (Distinguished Research Professor & Chair of the Department of Philosophy at Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary) said, “I have hung on to it since you sent it, & plan to keep doing so”: Historical Jesus – Two Centuries Worth of Citations.

atheist20nothing-cam-5613499