VIDEO: Response To Marcus Rogers' Oneness Misunderstandings

The following response to Marcus Rogers’ Oneness theological misunderstandings is by Jeremy Menicucci who’s YouTube channel you can find here.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help. Here is my donate/paypal page.

Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Facebook page and/or on my Google+ page.

Twitter: #MarcusRogers, #Oneness, #Theology
Facebook: #MarcusRogers, #Oneness, #Theology

Senate Bill No. 1322

Some of my books, all of which you can find here or here:

ff1d17fa53a96c1a96ff0ed59213b110-6783947

Social networks:
My Amazon author’s page
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Archive video site
Ken Ammi’s Product Reviews
My CafePress shop
Google +

Norm Geisler references TrueFreethinker.com:
Apologeticspress.com’s Kyle Butt references TrueFreethinker.com:

Read the article about which Gary Habermas, PhD (Distinguished Research Professor & Chair of the Department of Philosophy at Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary) said, “I have hung on to it since you sent it, & plan to keep doing so”: Historical Jesus – Two Centuries Worth of Citations.

atheist20nothing-cam-2031946

Unitarian Universalism

Some of my books, all of which you can find here or here:

ff1d17fa53a96c1a96ff0ed59213b110-2264453

Social networks:
My Amazon author’s page
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Archive video site
Ken Ammi’s Product Reviews
My CafePress shop
Google +

Norm Geisler references TrueFreethinker.com:
Apologeticspress.com’s Kyle Butt references TrueFreethinker.com:

Read the article about which Gary Habermas, PhD (Distinguished Research Professor & Chair of the Department of Philosophy at Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary) said, “I have hung on to it since you sent it, & plan to keep doing so”: Historical Jesus – Two Centuries Worth of Citations.

atheist20nothing-cam-3485507

Is Barak Obama the Theologian-In-Chief?

…the President has bequeathed upon himself the title of POTUS Maximus.

Something rather odd is afoot within the great national conversations upon which we have engaged as to whether ceratin terrorists are Muslims or not. Then again, even though we are constantly being told to have great national conversations what we get instead are great national lectures.

Indeed, we are lectured to and told to believe one single view with anyone who disagrees being labeled, at best, a racist, Islamophobic, hater, etc.

The issue at hand is the rather odd position in which Barack Obama, and for that matter George W. Bush before him, and their administrations have placed themselves with the addition of those who favor their lectured views.

Ponder this, if you will, in the book review of “The Church of Scientology” by Hugh B. Urban it was noted:

Hugh Urban notes that, outside and beyond the definitions proposed by scholars, in the USA is it the IRS, yes the Internal Revenue Service (the tax guys), who ultimately defined what is a religion. The reason is quite simple really: it is the IRS who decides who is granted tax except status and so they must be able to define what is religion. It is a fascinating and very disturbing reality.

Well, beyond the IRS (which thinks that emails magically disappear into crashed hard drives) the USA has become a styled inquisitor theocracy the President has bequeathed upon himself the title of POTUS Maximus.*

Ponder the fact, and fact is it—a authoritative fact with which none may disagree as it is pogma (political dogma)—that the POTUS defines and declares who is and who is not of an adherent of any given religious faith. Is the president elected (or selected or anointed) to keep America safe, free and prosperous or to hold out or withhold the scepter which identified who and who is not of a given religion?

We are told that certain terrorists are not Muslims and yet, as elucidated in the article Obama admin’s conflicting claims – are Muslim terrorists Muslim or not?, the definitely not Muslim Osama Bin Laden was given Muslim funerary rites at the behest and insistence of the very same administration that claimed that he is not a Muslim. Moreover, the US tax payer is funding the purchasing of Qur’ans / Korans and halal meals for definitely not Muslims in Guantanamo Bay where the non-Muslims are allowed five Islamic prayer times per day.

Such is the cognitive dissonance which we are supposed to simply accept—or else!

Now, Barack Obama, essentially, claims that certain terrorists are not Muslim because they do not uphold and thus do not follow Islamic doctrines. This was elucidated recently by Jeh Jonson, see Homeland Security secretary Jeh Johnson – Islam, a history of violence.

Now, another no so great national conversation that we are not supposed to have is whether Barack Obama is a Christian, a Muslim, or ____________ (fill in the blank).

Can we, may we, dare we wonder and ask whether the POTUS Maximus will allow us to put him to his own theology test?

Well, the Bible states, Christians should not be “forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as [is] the manner of some” (Hebrews 10:25). Barack Obama keep himself (and his entire family) from gathering together, within the text’s context which is worship.

He has besmirched the (mere) Bible but praised the (“Holy,” mind you) Qur’an / Koran—see Osama vs. Obama

He has skipped out on the National Prayer Breakfast but ensures that he has stated that the Muslim call to prayer is “one of the prettiest sounds on Earth” which, as Nicholas Kristof reported in the New York Times, “Mr. Obama recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them with a first-rate [Arabic] accent.” The portion he recited translates to “Allah is supreme, Allah is supreme, Allah is supreme, Allah is supreme. I witness that there is no god but Allah.”

He has been known to carry Hindu idols in his pocket; of the monkey god Hanuman—FYI: idolatry is not a Christian virtue.

He reads “devotionals” from various faiths; a Christian can, most certainly, read anything but to say that it is a “devotional” is of another category, on that Christians traditionally use within the context of a time of prayerful reflection and musing upon YHVH’s sayings and doings.

His Muslim father gave him the middle name “Hussein” and extended family are Muslims. His Muslim stepfather raised him, in part, and educated him whilst they lived in Indonesia. He attended the church of the ex-Muslim Reverend Jeremiah Wright—which considers Yoga to be a Christian virtue. A role model of his was the Nation of Islam leader Malcolm X. One of early religious advisors was the Muslim, Eboo Patel.

He has stated that “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam” and that “to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated, churches are destroyed, or the Holocaust is denied.”

There is much more to this issue but with these facts as a starting point the question becomes: does Barack Obama think and act like a Christian, a Muslim or ____________ (fill in the blank)?

Let the great national conversation ensue!

For more relevant info, see:

PBS misrepresents Islam’s Qur’an / Koran on beheading report

Islamic terrorism on Meet the Press-Ayaan Hirsi Ali vs. Arsalan Iftikhar

Is Barack Obama a Muslim?

Note: * “POTUS” is an acronym for President of the United Sates

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help. Here is my donate/paypal page.

Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Facebook page and/or on my Google+ page.

VIDEO: Greg Koukl on God and time – is God bound or unborn by time?

Some of my books, all of which you can find here or here:

ff1d17fa53a96c1a96ff0ed59213b110-4153123

Social networks:
My Amazon author’s page
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Archive video site
Ken Ammi’s Product Reviews
My CafePress shop
Google +

Norm Geisler references TrueFreethinker.com:
Apologeticspress.com’s Kyle Butt references TrueFreethinker.com:

Read the article about which Gary Habermas, PhD (Distinguished Research Professor & Chair of the Department of Philosophy at Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary) said, “I have hung on to it since you sent it, & plan to keep doing so”: Historical Jesus – Two Centuries Worth of Citations.

atheist20nothing-cam-9807881

Trinity United Church of Christ

Some of my books, all of which you can find here or here:

ff1d17fa53a96c1a96ff0ed59213b110-3715437

Social networks:
My Amazon author’s page
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Archive video site
Ken Ammi’s Product Reviews
My CafePress shop
Google +

Norm Geisler references TrueFreethinker.com:
Apologeticspress.com’s Kyle Butt references TrueFreethinker.com:

Read the article about which Gary Habermas, PhD (Distinguished Research Professor & Chair of the Department of Philosophy at Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary) said, “I have hung on to it since you sent it, & plan to keep doing so”: Historical Jesus – Two Centuries Worth of Citations.

atheist20nothing-cam-4013481

Hinduism

Some of my books, all of which you can find here or here:

ff1d17fa53a96c1a96ff0ed59213b110-1441968

Social networks:
My Amazon author’s page
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Archive video site
Ken Ammi’s Product Reviews
My CafePress shop
Google +

Norm Geisler references TrueFreethinker.com:
Apologeticspress.com’s Kyle Butt references TrueFreethinker.com:

Read the article about which Gary Habermas, PhD (Distinguished Research Professor & Chair of the Department of Philosophy at Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary) said, “I have hung on to it since you sent it, & plan to keep doing so”: Historical Jesus – Two Centuries Worth of Citations.

atheist20nothing-cam-2209180

Good Samaritan

Well, it happened again and so it seemed like a good opportunity to write on this issue. A self-professed skeptic attempted to, at least, downplay the Messiah, Jesus’, ethics by asserting that “The golden rule, prescribed by Confucius around 500 BCE.”

For the uninitiated, BCE is an anti-Christian manner of referring to BC. BCE means Before Common Era and BC means Before Christ. BCE is meant to disregard Jesus whilst still making use of the very same calendar which pivots history upon His birth—go figure.

The secret of the “Life of Pi”

If you are seeking for a cinematographic review of the movie “The Life of Pi” then, look elsewhere. The DVD cover quotes a reviewer stating, “A visual miracle.” Well, while it is nice to look at and contains much fantasy computer generated graphics; so do 1,001 other movies.

The Life of Pi has two main characters; a man who does not believe in God (whatever that is, according to this movie) but would like to if persuaded and Pi to whom the man is sent for such persuasion.

Pi is Indian in origin (not Native American but Indian from India) and was thus, raised Hindu. Hinduism is somewhat of a generic term but generally denotes belief in, literally, millions of gods and engagement upon many occult practices (by any other name; practices upon which Westerners place happy faces as they water them down and clean them up for Western consumption; consider transcendental meditation or Yoga as two examples).

Pi’s father is a cynic (some would say skeptic or rational) who is not religious but has a problem with Pi’s beliefs due to their illogical nature. You see, along the way Pi also becomes a Catholic and a Muslim. Thus, he is, at once, a Hindu-Catholic-Muslim. This will make up the bulk of our exposing the secret Life of Pi or, rather, the secret of the Life of Pi; meaning, what the movie really about.

The movie is supposed to be about truly experiencing God in one’s own way and this is the movie’s biggest problem. It is not difficult to understand why this movie would appeal to many people; especially in this age of synchrotististic if it feels good, it must be true: you can learn the folly of such a view via this video:

However, as I watched it I was continuously embarrassed for the script writers; it is so utterly illogical, pseudo-spiritual and theologically bankrupt—even whilst pushing a theology of its own.

Long movie short; Pi’s family owns a zoo and whilst moving the animals via seaborne ship they encounter a storm which sinks the ship. Pi’s parents drown as do all of the animals sans an orangutan, a hyena, a zebra, a tiger and Pi. They all end up on a life-boat and you can imagine the difficulty of a carnivorous tiger in a little boat with plenty of “food.”

In the end, the only ones who survive are Pi and the tiger. Once they make it to land the ship’s insurance company interviews Pi so as to know how to handle the financial loss.
He tells them the story about him and the animals, along with his experiences upon a mysterious island and they basically do not believe him. In the end, he retells the story but divulges that it was mostly symbolic with the orangutan representing his mother, the hyena being a cook, the zebra being a tailor and…we will come to the tiger and Pi in a moment.

Thus, the story is about these people surviving but ending up murdering each other on the lifeboat (Pi was at sea for a total of 277 days).

Along the way, Pi notes that he came to know God via his ordeal and so, on the surface, the movie has Pi representing himself and the tiger representing god. This alone is problematic; even though it would appear that God the tiger is purposefully putting Pi through ordeals which eventually lead to Pi being closer to God—as the two do develop a relationship of sorts—it is Pi who is training the tiger, bending the tiger’s will towards his own; Pi is directing and redefining the tiger.

On the other hand; the movie also resents Pi as the tiger and god as Pi. Thus, it is the other way around; this would make more sense as God/Pi is training the Pi/tiger. However, this too is problematic for when they finally come to dry land it is emphasized that Pi/god laments that as the tiger/Pi is walks away and is about to disappear into the trees the tiger/Pi does not bother to look back which would have been a symbol of gratitude, so long and thanks of all the fish, etc.

Thus, the secret of the Life of Pi is that Pi simply walks away from god without so much as a thanks and goes back to his life (in the woods) to keep acting as a wild animal (the tiger).

While, for example, Sikhism claims to have reconciled Islam and Hinduism; one can imagine how problematic that is, both logically and theologically. It is claiming that God is, at once and both, one single unified monotheistic personal being and also millions of beings to the point of pantheism. On top of this Pi throws in Catholicism which hold that YHVH was incarnated as the Messiah Jesus, a divine member of the Trinity, who is the way, the truth and the life and no one come to God the Father except through Him.

In the end, the man who is interested in seeking God does accept “God.” He does this after having heard both versions of Pi’s story; the one about the animals and the one about what the animals represented. Pi asks the man which of the stories he liked and the man said that it was the one about the tiger. Pi tells him that God is that same way.
Thus, the basic message is that God is whatever you think God is. Whatever ideas you invent about God is God. However, digging deeper; the point is that you are God since you get to invent whatever idea of God you like. In other words, even the styled-Atheist in the movie comes away believing in God—which is no God at all as he just made up a story he liked.

Consider that Sam Harris, the celebrity New Atheist, is an Atheist mystic Buddhist (who does not like the terms Atheist mystic or Buddhist). He believes in mystical experiences (and has had them himself due to drug use and meditation) which he claims are merely the stuff of gray-matter and require no supernatural interaction at all.

Alright then, with that in mind (that one can be spiritual and an Atheist) the Life of Pi could very well be an Atheist movie. If you are the sort of Atheist who leans towards spirituality then you can just invent a nice story with a character you call God. Of course, this results in the actual real life God of the Atheist; themselves.

The original rebellion was when lucifer said, “I will be like the Most High” (Isaiah 14:14) and the original temptation was when lucifer turned satan (light bearer turning into the adversary) told Eve, “you will be like God” (Genesis 3:15). This is exactly that which Atheists do and what the Life of Pi promulgates; you will be like God and actually topple God as you make yourself God by creating God in your image (keep in mind that lucifer also stated, “I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God”—Isaiah 14:13).
By telling, nay demanding, God how God ought to be; you become God’s God and God’s God would be God, the God of Gods.

Therefore, the Life of Pi is not what it seems and discernment draws out its true point; “enlightenment” via walking away from God and reaching self-deification.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help. Here is my donate/paypal page.

Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Facebook page and/or on my Google+ page.

Stephen Hawking on brain as computer

I regard the brain as a computer which will stop working when its components fail.
There is no heaven or afterlife for broken down computers
”—Stephen Hawking

Well, it is no wonder that when Stephen Hawking positively affirmed God’s non-existence—a claim to know it as a fact—he did not prove it (see VIDEO and ARTICLE: Atheist Stephen Hawking claims to know that God does not exist).

It is even less of an wonder why when Stephen Hawking declared that philosophy is dead it was ubiquitously pointed out that he based that conclusion on philosophy, he philosophizes so as to do his science (and his opinions on many things unrelated to his science) and his statement is philosophically unsustainable.

Well, another philosophic statement of his is the one above with which I agree when stated as is but with which I will dig a little deeper so as to arrive at a deeper truth.

video20game20mind20control2c2010-5636091

The brain, as the mass of organic matter which it is, can be said to be like a computer—setting aside that it is technologically lightyears beyond our current abilities to build.
When that mass of organic matter “stop working” as in no longer receives oxygen, nutrients, etc. then indeed, “its components fail” and it decays—period.

Now one could argue that there are very many stores which are the equivalent of a heaven or afterlife for broken down computers since they repair them, exchange damaged parts for new ones, etc. Yet, let us go with it as is since all metaphors eventually break down since they are, after all, just that: metaphors. Also, when metaphors are employed people tend to want to argue about the metaphor rather than that which it is means to represent.

Now, a computer in the everyday manner of thinking about it consists of hardware and software.
On this view, the brain is the hardware which “will stop working when its components fail” yet there is also software which is like the mind. Even when the hardware is damaged—even beyond repair—the software may be able to be extracted.

Thus, the “heaven or afterlife” for broken down software is that it can be re-uploaded into another computer.

Now, let us go deeper still: The brain equals hardware and the hardware equals the body.

The mind equals software and the software equals the soul.

When the body is damaged beyond repair—due to injury, the ware and tare of old age, etc.—the soul is re-uploaded into a new—glorified, resurrected—body: a Body 2.0.

Moreover, a computer’s hardware and its software will not function without a source of energy: from a wall socket or from a battery.

On this view the energy is the spirit which is what animates the body through which the soul expresses itself.
To conclude that the non-existence of the soul can be disproven by the fact that the body ceases to function is tantamount to claiming that the non-existence of the software can be disproven by the fact that the hardware ceases to function.

Thus, I regard the brain as a computer’s hardware which will stop working when its components fail but view the mind as a computer’s software which keeps working when the hardware’s components fail. And so, there is a heaven or afterlife for broken down computer’s software when it is placed within upgraded hardware.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help. Here is my donate/paypal page.

Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Facebook page and/or on my Google+ page. You can also use the “Share / Save” button below this post.