Top interviews: William Ramsey on “Occult Hollywood,” NWO, symbolism, etc.

Hereinafter are links to various interviews with William Ramsey.

Note that even the interviews on the same topics vary quite a bit as the host prods for different details.

Ramsey is the author of the following books:

Prophet of Evil: Aleister Crowley, 9/11 and the New World Order [NWO]

Aleister Crowley: a visual study

Abomination: devil worship and deception in the West Memphis Three Murders [WM3 one of whom is Damien Echols about whom you can learn here]

For now, you can get it at William Ramsey’s site: Children of the Beast: Aleister Crowley’s Shadow over Humanity.

He produced the documentary Occult Hollywood

He also discusses various issues within the interviews, such as occult architecture such as that in Washington DC, Adolf Hitler’s Nazi occultism, Luciferian symbols, predictive programming, etc.

The audio links will begin playing the interview or, you can right click on the link to “save as.” The video interviews will begin playing the interview on YouTube.

Also see his website.
And William Ramsey’s YouTube channel for unique videos regarding these topics.

OCCULT HOLLYWOOD

occulthollywood-9185370

Watchmen Chronicles interview.

Off Planet Radio interview.

Minister Grock’s Truth Be Told interview.

ramseyhollywood-9082961 MISCELLANEOUS

aleistercrowley-avisualstudy-6070105

Washington D.C. (District of the false goddess Columbia):

Occult Architecture and Luciferian Symbolism:

Vyzygoth Raw Live interview on our occult political (mis)leaders:

William Ramsey and Larry the Contractor Guy discussion on Aleister Crowley, Adolf Hitler and the occult :

Think Or Be Eaten interview on futuristic themes in literature, movies, TV & entertainment:

Vyzygoth Raw Live interview on Occult Hollywood and Aleister Crowley: Part 1:

Part 2:

William Ramsey and Larry discussion on the “Children of the Beast”: Part 1:

Part 2:

Business Insider

Some of my books, all of which you can find here or here:

ff1d17fa53a96c1a96ff0ed59213b110-5325401

Social networks:
My Amazon author’s page
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Archive video site
Ken Ammi’s Product Reviews
My CafePress shop
Google +

Norm Geisler references TrueFreethinker.com:
Apologeticspress.com’s Kyle Butt references TrueFreethinker.com:

Read the article about which Gary Habermas, PhD (Distinguished Research Professor & Chair of the Department of Philosophy at Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary) said, “I have hung on to it since you sent it, & plan to keep doing so”: Historical Jesus – Two Centuries Worth of Citations.

atheist20nothing-cam-8777333

Nativity Scene

Some of my books, all of which you can find here or here:

ff1d17fa53a96c1a96ff0ed59213b110-8082953

Social networks:
My Amazon author’s page
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Archive video site
Ken Ammi’s Product Reviews
My CafePress shop
Google +

Norm Geisler references TrueFreethinker.com:
Apologeticspress.com’s Kyle Butt references TrueFreethinker.com:

Read the article about which Gary Habermas, PhD (Distinguished Research Professor & Chair of the Department of Philosophy at Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary) said, “I have hung on to it since you sent it, & plan to keep doing so”: Historical Jesus – Two Centuries Worth of Citations.

atheist20nothing-cam-8483237

fake news

There are various lists foaling about cyberspace of celebrities who will not perform yet, a close look reveals that some will be out of the country (KISS), some take issue with the lack of tax releases (Moby), etc., etc., etc.
Yet, I was most interested in personages exampled by Jennifer Holliday who initially was going to but then pulled out. Previously, she sang in relation to Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush.

Pope Francis

CNN’s Supreme Court Reporter, Ariane de Vogue, wrote, “Pope Francis and the future of the death penalty,” CNN, September 24, 2015 AD. Such reports denote the lack of journalistic integrity when reporters write, shall we say, half stories. Since they know not of what they speak, they misreport the news and in doing so actually create the news.

What is all of my fuss about?

Let us consider Pope Francis’ recent statements with regards to capital punishment – the death penalty:

TIME magazine – Evolution of Modern Satanism in the US

A TIME Magazine article written by Lily Rothman is titled “The Evolution of Modern Satanism in the United States,” July 27, 2015 AD.

A few recent events have reawakened attention and interest in Satanism. One is the erection of a status of Baphomet which includes two admiring children, see: Satanic Temple raises funds for abortion. Others are considered within the following articles:

Miranda Barbour: is she a satanist and are her murders satanic crimes?

And, see the follow up: Satanic crime – Miranda Barbour claims 22 victims

Eric Minerault burns and urinates on a Bible: satanic crime or art?

Satanist compliments Judeo-Christianity: destroys Ten Commandments

Satanic Temple spokesperson Jex Blackmore stated that the Baphomet statue, the goat headed hermaphrodite, is meant to signify “a reconciliation of opposites” yet, in 2nd Corinthians 6:14 the rhetorical question is asked, “what communion has light with darkness?”

Lily Rothman notes:

In the early 1970s, interest in the occult in American culture was so high that TIME devoted a cover story to the topic, and a large portion of it was focused on Satanism.

Within that 1972 AD story, TIME all but encouraged Satan worship by appealing to desperate and rebellious youth, noting:

Some of the confessions [in the Inquisition age] must have been sheer defiance: faced with a ruling establishment that was sanctified by the church, a resentful peasantry followed the only image of rebellion they knew—Satan…
The satanic messiah became especially appealing in times of despair, such as the era of the plague known as the Black Death. Real or imagined, the pact with the Devil may have been the last bad hope for safety in a world fallen out of joint.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Just below Lily Rothman’s article on Satanism, TIME magazine had a slide show titled as follow with the primary example being Hilary Clinton:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

An example of that which TIME terms “the existence of Satanists as an organized, public group” is their mention of Anton Szandor La Vey who founded the church of Satan and wrote The Satanic Bible. It is mistakenly often asserted that LaVey viewed Satan as merely metaphorical. Michael Aquino left the church of Satan in order to establish the temple of Set which is viewed as a group that held that Satan was a personal being.

As TIME explained in 1972, La Vey’s organization was not the scary Satanism of religious imagination:

La Vey’s church and its branches might well be called the “unitarian” wing of the occult. The members invest themselves with some of the most flamboyant trappings of occultism, but magic for them is mostly psychodrama—or plain old carnival hokum.

Apparently, there is some truth to this as Satanism is about mocking YHVH, the Bible, and Christianity.

They invoke Satan not as a supernatural being, but as a symbol of man’s self-gratifying ego, which is what they really worship. They look down on those who actually believe in the supernatural, evil or otherwise.

There is more to the story than this since, as I noted in Miranda Barbour: is she a satanist and are her murders satanic crimes?, when Anton LaVey’s girlfriend Jayne Mansfield’s son was mauled by a lion (at Jungleland, a private zoo), LaVey and fellow Satanists actually invoked the healing help of their “Brother Satan” as a personal being with the ability intercede for them.

TIME went on to report:

Though the 1960s and ’70s saw the introduction of several other concepts called Satanism—from actual religious belief, to a credo used to justify criminality—the Church of Satan did not fade away. In 1978, the U.S. Army even included the group in the manual of “Religious Requirements and Practices” delivered to its hundreds of chaplains.

In fact, the aforementioned (Ret) US Intelligence officer Col Michael Aquino was the first Satanist to become an official US Army chaplain.
He stated the following during the legal battle between US Army Maj Grady McMurtry and Kenneth Grant regarding the legitimate chartered of the US Grand Lodge of the Ordo Templi Orientis (OTO):

While sitting in the courtroom watching Judge Legge preside sternly over the slug-out, I couldn’t help wondering if he had any idea he was ruling on which group had legal claim to anal sex as the supreme religious sacrament in the United States.—Scroll of Set, Vol. XII no. 5, Oct. 1986 AD

Learn more about this sorted subject in the article Satanic sodomy and the Typhonian tradition: sex magick.

Next, TIME comes to the modern day:

The brand of Satanism on display in Detroit was of a different sort: political Satanism, a more recent innovation. Those activists are associated with the Satanic Temple, a New York-based group that has spent the last few years publicly offering alternatives to more mainstream displays of religiosity. The Satanic Temple sees Satan as a Paradise Lost-inflected metaphor who represents skepticism and the ability to challenge authority.

This pertains to the group that erected a statue of Baphomet, raised funds for abortion, etc.
Interestingly, A Satanic Temple spokesperson noted to TIME that erecting the Baphomet statue is mean “to ensure that its view of the world is included.” Yet, if Satanism is about worshipping man’s self-gratifying ego then our culture is already primarily Satanic and they are merely putting an image to the concept.

Another very interesting point is as follows:

…a point made by John M. Kincaid, the Church of Satan’s minister of information in the mid-1970s: though it may take a variety of forms, interest in mystery and rebellion is timeless.
“The need to believe,” he wrote to TIME in 1974, “is as dominant a factor in this so-called enlightened age of ours as it has ever been”—which means those who are skeptical are present and accounted for too.

Well, as GK Chesterton had his fictional character Father Brown state:

The first effect of not believing in God is to believe in anything.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help. Here is my donate/paypal page.

Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Facebook page and/or on my Google+ page. You can also use the “Share / Save” button below this post.

American Civil Liberties Union

Some of my books, all of which you can find here or here:

ff1d17fa53a96c1a96ff0ed59213b110-1396936

Social networks:
My Amazon author’s page
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Archive video site
Ken Ammi’s Product Reviews
My CafePress shop
Google +

Norm Geisler references TrueFreethinker.com:
Apologeticspress.com’s Kyle Butt references TrueFreethinker.com:

Read the article about which Gary Habermas, PhD (Distinguished Research Professor & Chair of the Department of Philosophy at Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary) said, “I have hung on to it since you sent it, & plan to keep doing so”: Historical Jesus – Two Centuries Worth of Citations.

atheist20nothing-cam-4726421

Nancy Pelosi Preaches, Again—All Hail the Obama Theocracy

Barack Obama’s administration’s House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), is making statements in keeping with advancing theocracy in North American government—again.
I term is theocracy because as per her previous statements and the response of watchdog (or, is it watchgod) groups who keep a close, sharp and keen eye on any hint at a breaking of the non-Constitutional separation of church and state.

I previously reported that she literally prescribed to clergy what they are to preach from their pulpits. What was the response of the watchdog/watchgod activists? Well, as if with one voice Dan Barker’s “Freedom From Religion Foundation,” “American Civil Liberties Union” (ACLU), “Theocracy Watch,” “Talk to Action,” “God’s Own Party?” as well as Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins had utterly nothing to say.

Certainly, it is instances such as these which expose those, and other, groups as what they are and what they are not: they are not interested in protecting the non-Constitutional separation of church and state; they are interested in besmirching conservative values and influence in American life, law and politics.

This time Nancy Pelosi was much more blatant1:

At a May 6 Catholic Community Conference on Capitol Hill, the speaker said: “They ask me all the time, ‘What is your favorite this? What is your favorite that? What is your favorite that?’ And one time, ‘What is your favorite word?’ And I said, ‘My favorite word? That is really easy. My favorite word is the Word, is the Word. And that is everything. It says it all for us. And you know the biblical reference, you know the Gospel reference of the Word.”

“And that Word,” Pelosi said, “is, we have to give voice to what that means in terms of public policy that would be in keeping with the values of the Word. The Word. Isn’t it a beautiful word when you think of it? It just covers everything. The Word.

“Fill it in with anything you want. But, of course, we know it means: ‘The Word was made flesh and dwelt amongst us.’ And that’s the great mystery of our faith. He will come again. He will come again. So, we have to make sure we’re prepared to answer in this life, or otherwise, as to how we have measured up.”…

After Pope Benedict XVI met privately with Speaker Pelosi in February 2009, the Vatican issued a statement saying: “His Holiness took the opportunity to speak of the requirements of the natural moral law and the Church’s consistent teaching on the dignity of human life from conception to natural death which enjoin all Catholics, and especially legislators, jurists and those responsible for the common good of society, to work in co-operation with all men and women of good will in creating a just system of laws capable of protecting human life at all stages of its development.”

The last point is noteworthy because Nancy Pelosi supports the inhuman, inhumane and subhuman brutal murder of healthy, beautiful, innocent and defenseless human babies having gone as far as supporting partial-birth abortion.

Now, it is certainly odd to claim, both, that “the biblical reference…the Gospel reference” to the Word is that “The Word was made flesh and dwelt amongst us” (read John ch. 1) and also that that Word “just covers everything” and that we can “Fill it in with anything you want.”

But, be that as it may; the point is clear and her position is ultimately that “of course, we know [the Word] means” and that she is defining the Word Biblically. Yet, she is then applying it to public/governmental policy and we know that this can mean anything/everything such as abortion, welfare, the social gospel, etc.

So, what do the watchdogs/watchgods have to say about the fact that a Democrat, Barack Obama administration, House Speaker is stating that, “we have to give voice to…public policy that would be in keeping with the values of the Word….‘The Word was made flesh and dwelt amongst us’”?

Dan Barker: nothing. ACLU: not a word. Theocracy Watch: nope. Talk to Action: keeping silent. God’s Own Party?: nada. Sam Harris: nay. Richard Dawkins: nihil.

Americans United for Separation of Church and State: ah, now we have something!

Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United for [the non-Constitutional] Separation of Church and Stat, posted a statement in (generic) June 2010 “Perspective” about the previous Nancy Pelosi comments:

…when it comes to separation of church and state, I am really and truly conservative….

I’ve been on [The O’Reilly Factor] twice in the past month, and during my most recent appearance, Bill wanted to discuss what I thought of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s comment during a press conference that the Catholic bishops who want immigration reform should tell their priests to talk about it in church and get support for a new immigration policy from parishioners…

On the Pelosi matter, I told Bill’s producer in the routine pre-interview that I didn’t think Pelosi violated the Constitution or the tax laws by encouraging a church to get involved in her side of an issue, but that I am always uncomfortable when politicians try to set the agenda for the church.2

Now, this is interesting: Nancy Pelosi can prescribe to clergy what they are to preach from the pulpits and she gets a pass from Barry Lynn—fascinating. One wonders when, and if, Barry Lynn will have something to say about Nancy Pelosi’s latest preaching.

For one; CNS News reports that, “Pelosi’s office did not respond to CNSNews.com’s follow-up questions regarding the speaker’s statement that she seeks to make policy in conformance with the values of the Word made flesh.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help. Here is my donate/paypal page.

Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Facebook page and/or on my Google+ page.

Making A Murderer of Steven Avery?

Steven Avery served 18 years in prison for the 1985 AD sexual assault of Penny Beerntsen. Eventual DNA testing resulted in Avery not being involved but identified the assailant as being Gregory Allen, who was already serving a prison.

Below we will consider the following as per subsections:

The Avery Cases Lavey’s Choice and Crowley’s Cat Back to the Avery Cases Claims of Molestation Avery’s Kids Making a Murderer

Secret Satanic Sex Cult Club & Serial Murderers?

It is readily discernable why the Steven Avery crime cases (plural) are fascinating as they have it all. There is the shock value of the crimes which so many find darkly fascinating in a true crime story sort of way. And they also have the various twists and turn that make for speculative armchair commentary.

making2ba2bmurderer2b1-6707681

THE AVERY CASES
Steven Avery’s initial crime story goes from guilty to vindication. His latter crime had Brendan Dassey (Avery’s nephew) confessing and then taking it back. Both cases include the factors of police mishandling if not manipulating the crime scene and the evidence.

So for the latter crime (to which we will get below) the theorizing goes: why would Avery commit murder circa three years after being released from 18 years of false imprisonment? Surely, the cops framed him. But then, why would police officers who just had the spotlight on them for mishandling Avery’s original case frame Avery circa three years he was released from false imprisonment?
Well, perhaps Avery is a psychopath and this is that which he does. But then again, perhaps the officers are psycho or socio-paths and this is that which they do: could have been a heat of the moment based desire to vindicate themselves, get revenge, etc., etc., etc.
Then again, maybe Avery thought that no one would think him to be a criminal, that the police would not come after him for fear of reopening the infected wound of having falsely imprisoned him. But then maybe the officers thought that no one would think that they would botch it again after having endured a very public case of false imprisonment.

This is one of the reasons that there are specifically trained professional profilers since one can speculate in any direction one pleases and find this or that supposed factoid which is seen to lend support to this or that theory (of course, profilers are, au fond, as fallible as you and I in the end). When one is dealing with the criminal element (whether they wear a badge or not) and especially with socio or psycho-paths one is dealing with people who do not think like the average person. This makes it exceedingly difficult to discern their motivations which lead to any given action.

Now, one issue in this case is that of a generation gap since when a criminal strikes now-a-days they likely left a styled cyber diary and we can learn much about their worldview from blog posts, social networking site comments, photos, videos, etc. (see my articles on Satanic crime for obvious evidence of this).
But as for Steven Avery, we only know the bits and pieces that news controllers allow their hand puppets to state publically.

LAVEY’S CHOICE AND CROWLEY’S CAT
I have a broadcast receiving bunny ears TV so have all but missed out on the Steven Avery discussions and documentaries on cable/satellite shows, news, Netflix, etc. I decided to write about this issue because I saw a clip from Making A Killer wherein Avery admits to killing a cat.
Now, when Miranda Barbour claimed to be a Satanist and that she does not know how many people she murdered because she stopped counting at “22,” I knew that she was a Satanist of the Anton LaVey Church of Satan variety for reasons I elucidated here. The fact is that Anton LaVey has a chapter in his Satanic Bible titled “On the Choice of Human Sacrifice” (see see here) wherein he explicitly states that committing murder is a-okay according to his form of Satanism. There is also the following report Satanist charged with 22 rapes.
Adherents of Aleister Crowley’s Thelema also have explicit instructions from their Satanic messiah to perform Satanic ritual human sacrifice: Crowley preferred young boys as victims (see the video, which also references the “Happy Face Killers,” within the Avery’s Kids section below and also Pope vs Satanic Temple – canonization & demonization of St Junipero Serra for Crowley’s statements on the matter).

anton2blavey-6950989

But what does killing a cat have to do with Satanism in general or Anton LaVey or Aleister Crowley? Perhaps nothing at all. Yet, it did make me instantly think about Crowley’s confession within his book Confessions, chap 6, p. 73:

There is one amazing incident; at the age of fourteen as near as I can remember. I must premise that I have always been exceptionally tenderhearted, except to tyrants, for whom I think no tortures bad enough. In particular, I am uniformly kind to animals; no question of cruelty or sadism arises in the incident which I am about to narrate.

Let us pause to note that this is classic Crowley, classic Satanic dialectic: sure he specified that young human boys should be sacrificially murdered as a ritual to worship Satan but, by golly, he was a friend of animals (and reportedly engaged in bestiality to prove his love for them; actually, as another act of Satanic sex ritual).
Here is the tale he told:

I had been told “A cat has nine lives.” I deduced that it must be practically impossible to kill a cat. As usual, I became full of ambition to perform the feat. (Observe that I took my information unquestioningly au pied de la letter [i.e., literally].) Perhaps through some analogy with the story of Hercules and the hydra, I got it into my head that the nine lives of the cat must be taken more or less simultaneously. I therefore caught a cat, and having administered a large dose of arsenic I chloroformed it, hanged it above the gas jet, stabbed it, cut its throat, smashed its skull and, when it had been pretty thoroughly burnt, drowned it and threw it out of the window that the fall might remove the ninth life.

In fact, the operation was successful; I had killed the cat. I remember that all the time I was genuinely sorry for the animal; I simply forced myself to carry out the experiment in the interest of pure science.

Well, in 1982 AD, three years before being accused of sexual assault, Steven Avery was convicted of animal cruelty: he poured gasoline and oil on his cat and threw it into a fire: compare with “hanged it above the gas jet…it had been pretty thoroughly burnt.” Well, Aleister Crowley claimed to take the action “out the experiment in the interest of pure science.” Avery claimed, “I was young and stupid, and hanging out with the wrong people.”

crowley2527s2bcat-5971137

So, is there a worldview, an occult, correlation? I know not and lest Avery reveals a lot more about his worldview, we may never know.
In fact, it is well known that psychopaths tend to escalate their violent crimes from childhood experimentation with killing animals to adulthood murdering of humans. So does this necessarily mean that Avery is/was an adherent of Thelema aka Crowleyanity or a psychopath? I know not.

However, added to the speculations with which I began this article, comes another angle. In certain circles, speculations about “Satanic crime” rear their ugly head. Ugly due to their crimes and motivations and not ugly do to the mere speculations. So, for some or another reason many view certain crimes and discern a Satanic aspect. In the case of the West Memphis Three (WM3) for example, at least one of the accused, Damien Echols, was and is still very, very heavily into the occult. He essentially wrote a step by step explanation of how he became progressively more and more possessed (see here). Now, he continues admitting his occult activities on his Twitter page, etc.
In fact, this case has various similarities with the WM3 case such a circa two decade stay in prison, eventual exoneration, a documentary made about the case, claims that the documentary is bias, etc., etc., etc.

BACK TO THE AVERY CASES
Penny Beerntsen, the sexual assault victim for which Avery did 18 years actually picked Avery out of a lineup but, as this case is peppered with two steps forwards and two steps back, Michael Griesback, Wisconsin county prosecuting attorney, claims that she was manipulated into doing so. On the other hand, Griesback does not believe that Sgt. Andrew Colborn and Lt. James Lenk planted evidence in the Halbach case.

making2ba2bmurderer2b2-9690124

Now, Gregory Allen confessed to the 1985 AD sexual assault a decade later in 1995 AD but Sgt. Andrew Coburn failed to report the confession until the day after Avery was released in 2003 AD. Lt. James Lenk claimed that he arrived on Avery’s property for the Halbach investigation at 6-7 p.m. on November 5 but then claimed that it was really 14:05 p.m. when it was found that the official login sheet does not have him signed in but only signed out. Prior to November 5, a container of Avery’s blood that was in evidence was illegally opened via opening the seal and not being signed out. Sgt. Colborn and Lt. Lenk lead the Avery property investigation and were not supervised by the Calumet Police Dept. the fist day. It was on the seventh day of the investigation that they key was found by Lenz in plain sight.

Her vehicle’s license plate was missing and was eventually found crumpled up in a rundown station wagon on Avery’s property.

Both Teresa Halbach’s and Avery’s blood was found in her vehicle but no other DNA of his was found therein. Halbach’s blood was found on a bullet found on the floor in Avery’s garage Dean Strang, Avery’s defense attorney, did not dispute this yet, he concluded that it was planted evidence. Now, no other DNA of hers was found therein even though the garage is said to have been the scene of the murder.

Halbach’s bone fragments were found in a fire pit or burn barrel both on Avery’s property as well as in a location that was 10 miles away.

Lt. Lenk did not find the car key until eight days after Halbach disappeared. Also, the bullet was not found until five months after her murder

Ken Kratz, who is the former Calumet County District Attorney who sent Steven Avery to prison in the first place, stated that various items belonging to Halbach including her camera and phone were found to be within a barrel that was 20 feet from Steve Avery’s trailer and that “Two people saw him putting that stuff in there. This isn’t contested.” He also noted that Halbach “was creeped out” by and “was scared of” Avery since, for example, one of the times she went to his home, for business purposes, he was “wearing only a towel” when he opened the door. She had told her employer that “she would not go back” to Avery’s property.
On that note, handcuffs and leg irons and handcuffs were found in Avery’s home which he claims were purchased while he was with his ex-girlfriend Jodi Stachowski for kinky purposes.

making2ba2bmurderer2b6-7080068

Steven Avery sold various vehicles from his lot and so did business with the local AutoTrader. Reportedly, he called to schedule the Halloween photoshoot of a car asking for the “same girl as last time” and yet, used his sister’s name on the form. Speculation is that he was doing so in order to not clue Teresa Halbach in to the fact that it was him again. However, the address should have done so unless she was to meet somewhere else and then Avery or the corrupt cops moved her body to the lot.

This is the crime for which Brendan Dassey was also arrested and to which he confessed stating that Steven Avery shackled her to a bed, raped, beat and tortured Teresa Halbach. He claimed that Avery her and then handed Dassey the knife which he used to slice her throat. This is one of the difficulties as the question is: did Avery allegedly shoot her in the garage and then tie her to a bed? Yet, in any case, Dassey then took back his confession claiming that it was coerced and also, his confession seems to contradict the timeline (and yet, we are told that the timeline was developed by lying cops). Dan O’Donnell, a journalist, has concluded that Dassey’s confession was authentic and not coerced after viewing the four hour interrogation video stating that Dassey was “giving very incriminating details unprompted and unprovoked at every step of the way for a good hour.”

You can watch the entire interrogation here:

He was charged with first-degree murder and a charge which was later withdrawn which was mutilating a corpse. In this case, Steven Avery was charged with both first-degree murder and mutilating a corpse. Some claim that this denotes more litigious misconduct since they were both allegedly involved but only Avery was charge with corpse mutilation and yet, apparently it was determined that both committed the murder but only Avery mutilated the corpse.

CLAIMS OF MOLESTATION Part of the allegedly coerced confession included Brendan Dassey claiming that Steve Avery had sexually molested him. Dassey (16 years old at the time) told his mother that Avery “would grab me somewhere where I was uncomfortable” and during the confession stated Avery had attempted to grab his genitals “through the pants.”

Here is an image of a transcription of Dassey’s (“B”) statements to his mother, Barb Tadych (“M”):

making2ba2bmurderer2b7-8322650

Dassey later not only took back his entire crime confession but denied he was ever molested whilst undergoing a psychological evaluation. The confession was made in March 1, 2006 AD and the denial in November 2006 AD.

So if Avery did molest Dassey does that make him a sexual assaulter of adult and a murdering corpse mutilator? No. It is just a matter of evidence of his psychopathic character of the psycho or sociopathic character of the police. Also, note that Avery was sentenced to two years in prison (of which he served ten months in the jail) when he was convicted of burglarizing a bar in 1981 AD. He was sentenced to six years in 1985 AD for running his cousin off the road at gunpoint and assaulting her. She had previously complained that he exposed himself to her when she drove past his house.

1985 AD is also when he was charged with first-degree sexual assault and attempted first-degree murder and false imprisonment in the Penny Beerntsen case which lead to his 18 year imprisonment and for which he was vindicated via DNA testing. He was actually released on the occultically significant date of September 11, 2003 AD.

AVERY’S KIDS
Due to his 18 years, and now still counting, of being imprisoned Steve Avery was an absentee dad to his four kids. Two of them, Bill and Steven Jr. who are now 30 years old (twins) decided to be interviewed by Crime Watch Daily’s Melissa Moore who is the daughter of Keith Jesperson who in 1995 AD was convicted of murdering eight women; he was known as the “Happy Face Killer” a concept which may have occult ties:
See t=8.06 into the following Occult Investigations by William Ramsey video for an elucidation of the occult meaning of the happy face:

Not surprisingly, their memories are that of Avery as a dad “did love us, he did love our mom…I remember him giving us hugs and kisses” during prison visitations. Avery spanked them during one such visit, for “bugging other inmates” which may be understandable since, you know, being seen as being responsible for bugging other inmates could get Avery shanked. After having not spoken to Avery in “20-some years” as far as Jr. is concerned, “I just see him as a complete stranger. It just kind of feels like I don’t have a father.”

Bill noted that he cut all ties with his dad after a straw broke his camel back when he was made aware of a letter Avery wrote to his wife essentially threatening to hurt her if she hurt the boys. He stated, “If you love somebody, you don’t threaten them like that.”

Regarding Avery’s original conviction they, of course, can only know that which anyone else knows; they were kids at the time.

MAKING A MURDERER
WLUK-TV reported that Laura Ricciardi and Moira Demos, the filmmakers behind Making A Murderer, “condensed hundreds of hours of footage [“18 months’ worth of information”] into 10 one-hour episodes of the ‘Marking a Murderer’ series. The documentary features Avery’s defense attorneys suggesting police planted evidence to frame Avery.”

making2ba2bmurderer2b0-1504912

The Washington Times reported that the then special prosecutor Ken Kratz claimed that Making a Murderer “is slanted toward the defense” and “said the filmmakers never gave him a chance to answer the defense attorneys’ allegations. He said the documentary ignores up to 90 percent of the physical evidence that links Avery to the homicide…He said…[they] ‘only include the statements or pieces that support your particular conclusion.’”

SECRET SATANIC SEX CULT CLUB & SERIAL MURDERERS? Recall that due to DNA testing Avery was released on the occultically significant date of September 11, 2003 AD.

A 9 followed by 11 is seen as an occult boast since it skips over 10. Firstly, 9 is seen as the Number of the Beast since 666 reduces to 6+6+6=18 and 1+8=9. 11 is stated by many, such as occultists Aleister Crowley and Allen Greenfield, to be the premier occult number.

Now, when it comes to Paganism in general, which is involved in occultism and magick, all actions, symbols, etc. eventually break down to sex (and blood). Thus, in occult numerology the number 10 is viewed as the number of god because the “1” is obviously a phallic symbol and the “0” is its counter. Thus, 10 represents both genders in one and this is the occult concept of the perfect god and perfect human (or deified human): see my section on Postgender Androgyny, Hermaphroditism & Beyond.

It was then on the occultically significant date of October 31, 2005 AD that the Teresa Halbach murder occurred which, of course, was Halloween.

Retired police detective John A. Cameron is making the rounds, in certain circles, promulgating the claim that a Satanic serial murderer by the name of Edward Wayne Edwards and not Avery nor Dassey are the murderers of Teresa Halbach. Edwards was apprehended in 2009 AD, he admitted to five murders and to kidnapping, raping, as well as planting the bodies of victims in various locals so as to frame innocent persons which includes Steven Avery.
Cameron speculates that Edwards dressed up as Santa and murdered the little girl JonBenét Ramsey in 1996 AD. He also claims that he committed murders on October 12 as a commemoration of Aleister Crowley’s birthday (FYI: the Columbine mass murders were on Adolf Hitler’s birthday of April 20, see here). Also, the Zodiac Killer first sent his cryptic cypher on an April 20 and, as per Cameron, the deciphered cypher results in Edwards being the Zodiac.

As stated within the video above, Cameron noted that Edwards did things on specific dates such as committing murder on Christmas so as to despoil it. He noted that Edwards died at the age of 77. Now, at the time Edwards was very obese and suffered from various ailments such as being a diabetic. Cameron corresponded with him for nine months and towards the end, Edwards kept asking him to send him certain candies. Cameron knew that eating them would be detrimental to Edward’s health and so never sent them. Cameron speculates that Edwards was attempting to follow another pattern of his which was continued suicide attempts.

Cameron concludes that he may have been attempting to get certain (I would imagine very high glycemic and sugar filled) candies so as to get a fatal insulin shock. He also mentioned Aleister Crowley within the discussion within the video thus, I wrote to Cameron so as to inform him that his speculations about a suicide at 77 would make sense in an occult numerology sort of way. You see, Crowley had certain numbers he considered to be specifically significant, some of which are 11, 77, 93, and 175. Thus, I could certainly see Edwards choosing a 77 so as to give his death an occult numerology significance.

crowley2bseal-4100052
Aleister Crowley’s “Seal of Babalon” featuring a 7 pointed star and
three sets of 77 and as template for occultist Damien Echols’ back tattoo.

Now, a similar mass-serial murderer story is told about another person.
Various and sundry claims have been made about that which has been termed a “Satanic Sex Club,” “secret Satanic cult,” “Satanic racketeering club” and much of it involves Dave Begotka who claims that he was once invited to join the “secret club”: this is all within Wisconsin’s Fox Valley (his original YouTube channel was titled, DrNephilim666).
You can view Begotka’s video statements in his Steven Avery, “Clubs”, Weird & Suspicious Experiences
part 1, part 2 and part 3 (potty mouth warning).

Additionally, or in conjunction with the secret satanic sex cult club there are claims of an ops by a group known as the Shadow Government which the FBI has been investigating for some time now. The group is headed by “Rev.” Bob Enyart of Arvada, CO. Ex-members of the group told the FBI that Enyart is a “serial killer” pretending to be a Christian. The claim is that he was, in the least, involved in the Dylan Redwine, Jessica Ridgeway, JonBenet Ramsey and other murders.

show2bbob-8979633
Bob Enyart

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sources:
Dave Schrader, Steven Avery Murder Case, January 16, 2016 AD

Associated Press, Former prosecutor says Steven Avery documentary on Netflix is unfair, December 26, 2015 AD

Charlie Hintz, Manitowoc Man Believes a Secret Satanic Club Could be Behind the Steven Avery Case, January 14, 2016 AD

Bob Enyart Murdered Jon BenetRamsey, January 8, 2016 AD

Megan McCormick, Here’s The Evidence In Steven Avery’s Case That ‘Making A Murderer’ Left Out, January 12, 2016 AD

Mike Huberty, True Detective and the Steven Avery Cult Connection, January 19, 2016 AD

Leigh Egan, Steven Avery Update: Brendan Dassey Denies His Uncle Molested Him, February 16, 2016 AD

Sons of Steven Avery, of ‘Making a Murderer,’ speak out about whether they think he’s guilty, February 09, 2016 AD

Jethro Nededog, The disturbing allegation about Steven Avery that Netflix’s ‘Making a Murderer’ totally ignores, February 12, 2016 AD

Michael Thomas, Looking at the “Evidence” in the Steven Avery case, December 29, 2015 AD

Murderpedia, Steven Avery

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help. Here is my donate/paypal page.

Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Facebook page and/or on my Google+ page. You can also use the “Share / Save” button below this post.