date rape

Social networks:
My Amazon author’s page
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Archive video site
Ken Ammi’s Product Reviews
My CafePress shop
Google +

Norm Geisler references TrueFreethinker.com:
Apologeticspress.com’s Kyle Butt references TrueFreethinker.com:

Read the article about which Gary Habermas, PhD (Distinguished Research Professor & Chair of the Department of Philosophy at Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary) said, “I have hung on to it since you sent it, & plan to keep doing so”: Historical Jesus – Two Centuries Worth of Citations.

atheist20nothing-cam-9743362

secret teachings

Social networks:
My Amazon author’s page
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Archive video site
Ken Ammi’s Product Reviews
My CafePress shop
Google +

Norm Geisler references TrueFreethinker.com:
Apologeticspress.com’s Kyle Butt references TrueFreethinker.com:

Read the article about which Gary Habermas, PhD (Distinguished Research Professor & Chair of the Department of Philosophy at Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary) said, “I have hung on to it since you sent it, & plan to keep doing so”: Historical Jesus – Two Centuries Worth of Citations.

atheist20nothing-cam-8290551

PBS

Social networks:
My Amazon author’s page
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Archive video site
Ken Ammi’s Product Reviews
My CafePress shop
Google +

Norm Geisler references TrueFreethinker.com:
Apologeticspress.com’s Kyle Butt references TrueFreethinker.com:

Read the article about which Gary Habermas, PhD (Distinguished Research Professor & Chair of the Department of Philosophy at Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary) said, “I have hung on to it since you sent it, & plan to keep doing so”: Historical Jesus – Two Centuries Worth of Citations.

atheist20nothing-cam-9493720

CBS Sunday Morning show on the virtues of profanity

Yes, really!!! Welcome to the bottom of worldly wisdom—so called.

Hot on the heels of my article The “F” word shirt comes the article and CBS Sunday Morning show segment Some frank words about profanity (CBS News, October 23, 2016 AD) featuring Faith Salie, denote two points about communication. One is how to impress people and, in this case, give them an excuse (which is different than a reason) to employ profanity into their vocabulary: and that is, “Hey, a (as in one) study conclude…therefore, it is true and good.” The other is about how profanity is a virtue.

The claim is that “bad language” could “possibly be a good thing” which is actually “true” and about which “You may be right! Based on a recent study, researchers found that people who curse a lot are more intelligent.”
Of course, this brings us to the fact that quantifying intelligence is subjective: for example, book smarts vs. street smarts or common sense. The one single study being referenced is Jay, K., Jay, T., “Taboo word fluency and knowledge of slurs and general pejoratives: deconstructing the poverty-of-vocabulary myth,” Language Sciences, November 2015 AD. And you thought that those rappers are oh so hoi polloi: those people are geniuses based on the manner whereby they can rhyme cuss words together. Makes me wonder who funded the study yeah, who is the big bucks behind the research—Flavor Flav?!?!

The claim is that the one single study is that “fluency in taboo language correlates with overall verbal fluency. The more words you know, the more you know … AND the more colorfully you can express yourself, with nuance, metaphor and emotion” (ellipses in original). I can certainly agree that “The more words you know, the more you know” in general but that is like saying that “The more snuff films you watch, the more you know. Yet, overall how about making the colorful manner in which you can express yourself, with nuance, metaphor and emotion, be based on breaking out a thesaurus every now and again?—is there another word for thesaurus?

Faith Salie states, “let’s hear it for the ladies!” because as the one single study shows “men and women in this experiment swore in equal measure,” so both are equally disgusting. But oops, she played off of the gender binary, provided only two gender options and placed some into one and others into the other: TRIGGER!!!
Well, this goes to the nature of that which is considered taboo language as the politically correct movement’s commandments de jour are even now demanding that there are very many things we either cannot say or say at the risk of being bombarded with hatred. You may be aware that in Aldous Huxley’s 1932 AD book “Brave New World” since children were produced via artificial means, terms such as “mother” was viewed as “smut” talk. Well, we are living in a Cowardly New World right now.

She then makes a joke about how as a mother of a two-year-old and a four-year-old, “I definitely feel dumber now” and her kids “have been sabotaging my IQ. I’m squandering invaluable gray matter by censoring myself. Every time I say “Sugar!” and “Fudge!,” little neurons in my brain probably die.”

Conversely, “My husband is a graduate of two Ivy League universities — with a degree in Classics! — and he sounds like a David Mamet character when I hear him on a business call. Perhaps I should not be annoyed at my mother-in-law when she uses the ‘F-word’ in front of our children. Now I see that Grandma, a Ph.D., is merely trying to enrich their lexicon, so they can go to fine schools.”
Yes, you have the likes of her husband and mother-in-law for why you keep a clean home when it comes to such terminology but your kids hear it in school. Oh yeah, but, apparently, you should be thanking Faith’s husband and mother-in-law for making your children more intelligent.

We are also told that “Cursing makes you feel better” and so might punching people on the nose at will so have at it. In one other single study “participants were asked to plunge their hands into ice water for as long as they could bear it. When they were encouraged to swear up a storm, they were able to keep their hands underwater 73% longer.” So the lesson is that if for whatever reason you need your hand to remain submerged in ice water for a long time then well, you know.

I can dispute this result, the study’s conclusion, off the top of my head because there have been studies on weightlifting that suggest the merits of yelling out so as to pump yourself to get those last final reps in. And this is just yelling, even just a guttural sound.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help. Here is my donate/paypal page.

Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Facebook page and/or on my Google+ page.

Bill Cosby truly is “America’s (elitism) dad”

The seemingly endless accusations leveled against Bill Cosby by women claiming that he drugged and raped them has tugged at the scab under which hides those known variously as the elite.
There are elites in the form of royalty, politics, celebrity and other areas. These personages have the powder, money, prestige and adoration of the hoi polloi sufficient to virtually get away with anything.

Consider the case of Jimmy Savile (see attached video); someone who remembered him as a beloved entertainer noted that Savile likely spent the night in morgues so as to better appreciate life. This was excuse making for what for a common person would be rather odd in the least. Jimmy Savile spent nights in morgues, he is a beloved public figure thus, it must be okay, normal, natural, healthy, etc. Well, as it turns out; he would spend nights in morgues (something that the common person would never be allowed to do) because he was into necrophilia (as well as satanism and pedophilia; to name a few of his joys in life).

When the public, at large, was made aware of Jimmy Savile’s Satanism, pedophilia and necrophilia it was also revealed that there were those who, of course, had known about it for decades but where on the “inside” and did not say anything or hinted at it along the way (such as Johnny Lydon aka “Johnny Rotten”).

Ashley Collman has published a report titled, “How Bill Cosby’s team of high-profile lawyers and media experts silenced rape rumors for decades by threatening accusers and playing hardball with the press,” Daily Mail, December 29, 2014 AD in which the following question is asked and answered:

Most of the allegations against Cosby date back to the 1970s, which led to speculation over why the women stayed silent for so long. Like many rape victims, some of the women said they never reported the assault because they were scared of Cosby’s power and feared damaging their reputation.

The report notes:

When women first started coming forward to accuse Bill Cosby of rape last month, the public was surprised due to his flawless reputation as ‘America’s dad’. It has now been revealed that a team of lawyers and publicists worked tirelessly to keep his image pristine for decades, by silencing alleged victims and keeping the media from reporting their claims…

Such elite personages simply cannot function in terms of drugged rapes or in the Savile case, satanism, pedophilia and necrophilia without many people around them knowing about it. It is just that they have the powder, money, prestige to keep it, largely if not altogether, hushed up. The lawyers, publicists and media experts should be charge with accessory to Cosby’s crimes—yet, they too, of course, have certain protections in place and have people around them, assisting them, who also knew all about it.

The report elucidates that some specifically named handlers are “lawyer Martin Singer…former William Morris agent Norman Brokaw, his publicist son David, and New York lawyer John P Schmitt.” The team of handlers has consistently “depict them as greedy women seeking to destroy the once-beloved comedian’s reputation for a cut of his fortune”:

This pattern of intimidation goes all the way back to 2000 when an actress on his TV series ‘Cosby’ allegedly told police that he tried to put her hand down his sweatpants during a visit to his New York townhouse. Cosby’s lawyers threatened to sue the National Enquirer with a $250million defamation lawsuit if they published comments from the alleged victim’s relatives…

Just five years after threatening to sue the Enquirer, the paper was once again investigating claims against Cosby after Temple University employee Andrea Constand publicly accused the comedian of drugging and assaulting her at his Pennsylvania home. The Enquirer was looking to report on claims by another woman, Beth Ferrier, but Cosby’s team effectively silenced that woman’s story by offering an exclusive story from Cosby telling his side of the story. They employed the same tactic against Constand, whose mother allegedly asked Cosby to ‘make things right with money’ before her daughter went to the police to report the crime and one of Cosby’s lawyers called the move ‘a classic shakedown’, according to TV show Celebrity Justice which reported on the suit at the time.
In court, Cosby’s legal team acknowledged that the lawyer in question was Singer. Constand’s suit was later settled out of court for an unknown sum.

Also in 2005, a woman named Tamara Green said she was sexually assaulted by Cosby in Los Angeles in the 1970s and told her story on the Today Show and to the Philadelphia Inquirer. Cosby’s lawyers called Green’s claims ‘absolutely false’ and even offered ‘damaging information about her’ to the newspaper. As more and more women came forward in recent weeks to accuse Cosby, Green went public again with her story and Cosby’s lawyers reacted the same way – saying her claims were ‘a 10-year discredit accusation that proved to be nothing at the time, and is still nothing’…

One of the most shocking claims in the scandal comes from a woman named Judith Huth who says she was just 15 years old when Cosby got her drunk and forced her to perform a sex act on him at the Playboy Mansion. Huth filed a lawsuit against Cosby this month, but his lawyer Singer has tried to discredit the claims by revealing that Huth unsuccessfully attempted to sell her story to a tabloid a decade ago.

Cosby’s legal team is just as threatening with the media, and have in recent weeks sent letters to outlets like CNN and the New York Daily News urging them to stop their coverage of the scandal. ‘The media has consistently refused to look into or publish information about various women whose stories are contradicted by their own conduct or statement,’ Singer wrote in a letter to The Daily News, obtained by the Times.

Granted, this does not mean that a mere accusation against Bill Cosby amounts to his guilt and there are inconsistencies here and there:

Cosby’s lawyers also tried to stop Buzzfeed from publishing an account from former supermodel Janice Dickinson, who has also accused the comedian of sexual assault. ‘You proceed at your own peril,’ Singer wrote to the website, pointing out inconsistencies between Dickinson’s story and what she wrote in her memoir. Just yesterday in a story published in the New York Post, Singer blamed the media for reporting on claims from women he doesn’t believe have been properly vetted.
‘You [the media] don’t need private investigators to find out information about the accusers. A simple Google search will obtain the information,’ Singer said in a statement. Singer was commenting on a story in which it was revealed that Cosby is allegedly paying six-figure fees to a team of private investigators digging dirt on his accusers.

Other questionable cases are those of Beverly Johnson and Katherine McKee:

Johnson claimed that Cosby raped her after slipping a drug into her cappuccino during a visit to his home in the 1980s. Another source who says they have worked with Cosby for at least a decade confirmed the tactic and said it has already been successful in finding information to discredit both Johnson and another alleged victim, Katherine McKee. The team discovered that Johnson’s live-in boyfriend at the time only heard her say nice things about Cosby and that McKee, an ex-girlfriend of Sammy Davis Jr, wrote posts praising the comedian online after the alleged rape, according to the Post. In a published interview, McKee also once said she is ‘used to lying’. McKee, now 65, is the latest woman to publicly come forward to accuse Cosby, saying the comedian raped her in a Michigan hotel room in the early 1970s after inviting her to a party on a boat in Detroit.

A statement from McKee is either indicative of her warped sense of reality, the Hollywood mindset’s warped sense of reality or a combination of both:

‘It was a rape, but it seemed so strange to call it that. We think of rape as a stranger who attacks you in a parking lot,’ McKee, now a casting agent, told the New York Daily News. ‘I chalked it up to another powerful person in Hollywood who just felt he could take what he wanted from women.’

To think of rape as just “another,” mind you, “powerful person in Hollywood who just felt he could take what he wanted from women” and who, of course, allegedly did take what he wanted and did so within a circle of silence seems to be the modus operandi of the elite—both the alleged perpetrator and the victim, in this case, thought of it as such; it is just the sort of thing that is done.

misogyny

Perhaps a better title for the new book “A Gift For Muslim Couple” would be “A Gift For Misogynist Muslim Men.” Let us consider some reports and whether it is incumbent upon faithful, orthodox, Muslim men to be misogynist by Allah’s decrees within the Qur’an itself.

What is the fracas about anyhow? The book, published by Idara Impex in New Delhi, India, was written by Maulavi Ashraf Ali Thanvi who is described in the book’s foreword as a “prolific writer on almost every topic of Islamic learning.”

Lee Aronsohn, “Two and a Half Men” co-creator, makes sexist comments

Welcome to bizzaro-world where we miss the point, do not logically connect dots, condemn one person and excuse another for doing the very same things and on it goes.

Recently Rush Limbaugh was thoroughly condemned for making disparaging remarks about Sandra Fluke. Bill Maher was excused for making unmentionable remarks about Sarah Palin. Ed Schultz similarly expressed likewise sentiments about Laura Ingraham. Etc., etc., etc.

One thing to learn via the manner whereby such instances are dealt by the media and pop-culture in general is that those who purport, most vociferously, to be pro-woman, or pro-women’s rights, etc.—specially groups whose stated purpose is asserted to be just this—are not pro-woman / pro-women’s rights but pro-liberal-leftists-Democrat-woman / pro-liberal-leftists-Democrat-women’s rights solely, only and exclusively.

Well, the most recent entry into males disparaging females is “Two and a Half Men” co-creator Lee Aronsohn. He stated that television is too woman-centric, “he suggested female comics and their anatomy were taking over our TV sets.”

He referenced a “saturation” of female anatomy related references, “Enough, ladies. I get it. You have periods.”

The irony, the contradiction, the hypocrisy, the what’cha’ma’call’it is the entire premise upon which Lee Aronsohn’s show “Two and a Half Men” is based is that women are objects to be used and tossed aside like the flavor de jour. Every single episode of the show is based on acquiring women with whom to engage in unmarried, uncommitted sex and then move on to the next one, and the next one, and the next one whilst, by the way, teaching a young and impressionable child that this is perfectly acceptable.

What Lee Aronsohn said once is one issue but the bigger issue is that which he said every single time that his show airs.

This is, thankfully, not lost on everyone but it is being side stepped as he “declined to apologize for the regular portrayals of women as bimbos on ‘Two and a Half Men’”:

“Screw it,” he told the Toronto conference, according to the Reporter. “We’re centering the show on two very damaged men. What makes men damaged? Sorry, it’s women. I never got my heart broken by a man.”*

Now, you see that this is not just about comedy, or money, but about worldviews. He literally wrote his prejudice, his misogyny, his vendetta into the show. He has been hurt by women and so he based a show upon mistreating women as revenge.

The fact that a sad little man would actually have the chutzpah to present an idea to a TV exec about a show based upon treating women like interchangeable sexual objects is one thing. The fact that a TV exec would think it a good idea is another. And the fact that “Two and a Half Men” is an intensely popular, and lucrative, show is quite another.

Shame on us.

And it would be nice to be old fashioned enough to say, “Shame on us” and leave it at that. However, shame is integrity’s daughter and you cannot have the latter without the former.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

* “‘Two and a Half Men’ creator Lee Aronsohn sparks anger with sexist comments about women on TV Offers apology for saying television is too woman-centric, but backlash kicks in,” New York Daily News, April 3, 2012 AD

Neo

Social networks:
My Amazon author’s page
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Archive video site
Ken Ammi’s Product Reviews
My CafePress shop
Google +

Norm Geisler references TrueFreethinker.com:
Apologeticspress.com’s Kyle Butt references TrueFreethinker.com:

Read the article about which Gary Habermas, PhD (Distinguished Research Professor & Chair of the Department of Philosophy at Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary) said, “I have hung on to it since you sent it, & plan to keep doing so”: Historical Jesus – Two Centuries Worth of Citations.

atheist20nothing-cam-5127131

The “F” word shirt

I was shopping at one of those all-in-one mega stores one day when I noticed a woman walking around with two children, I was with mine as well, and what drew my attention to her was that she was wearing a black shirt with large white letters on the front: five words, three of which were four letters long and began with an “F”—yes, three large F-bombs.

The store was the sort that you cannot leave without showing your receipt and have your items checked against it—because for some reason we are considered guilty until proven innocent: welcome to America.

There were two receipt checker and my kids and I found ourselves being granted the privilege of leaving the store with our purchases as the same time as she and her kids: we in one line, she in the other.

So, I walked over to her and in a perfectly soft and kind manner, not to mention keeping my voice down so as to not make a scene and embarrass her, I said, “You may want to consider the sorts of messages you are displaying” to which she replied, “Oh, like what?”

Well, it was obviously all over with virtually before it began. You know, it was one of those replied that was of an emphasis to the likes of I do declare, I have no clue to what you could possibly be referring—oh my. Well, I decided that a swift slap to the back of her head was not the best course of actions: however well-deserved that would have been, capiche?

So, in the same perfectly soft, kind and quiet manner I said, “Like the one you are displaying on your shirt.” Now, you certainly would expect a reply such as, Thank you ever so much my dear sir indeed, I now recognize the folly of my actions and will muse upon what has brought me to such a place in my life where I even thought that such an action was perfectly acceptable.
But alas, her reply was, “What’s wrong with it?” Well, at that point I could certainly have recommended that a team of specialists be assembled so as to give her the 24-7 care that she obviously and desperately requires.

However, I opted to softly, kindly and quietly reply, “If you don’t know then you need a lot of help” and with that, I turned around, walked a couple of feet to my cart and walked away.

As I did so, she loudly said, “You’re the one that needs help! America is too sensitive.”

Besides being heartbroken for her and also for her children, I thought to myself that she had just committed a few logical fallacies.

Via her emotive reaction she found a way to excuse herself and telling herself that the problem was me. This was obviously a wasted opportunity for her as she could have grown ethically from it but instead, she doubled down in her lack of ethics even more by being even more self-assured of her righteousness and the unrighteousness of anyone, such as myself, who may have a problem with that which she does. You see, her point was that the problem was not her utterly disgusting actions (the very ones she is teaching to her children and displaying to mine) rather, the problem was me.

Thus, within a nanosecond she went from being unethical to actually being a self-appointed martyr for the cause of freedom itself and/or social justice itself or however she “thinks” of such things.

The problem is not her actions rather the problem is that “America is too sensitive.” So, now this was not about her and not about her and me but, by golly, this was about AMERICA as a whole. On that view, she is a self-appointed activist and I represent “The Man” while she represents the freedom to stick it to The Man.

But what was her reaction? Well, it was to react emotionally since she went on the instant attack and thus, she showed herself to be what? Anyone? Anyone? She was being too sensitive.

She too sensitive even whilst claiming that the problem (that she was singlehandedly attempting to remedy) is too much sensitivity. She was also then lashing out “You’re the one that needs help.” Apparently, I need help because I am too sensitive and should follow her lead in doing what? Being too sensitive and going on the retaliatory attack, you’re the problem buddy!

Another very similar instance was being at a fast-food establishment with my family and whilst getting napkins, etc. having a young man walk by me wearing a very similar shirt. In my usual manner I said, “You should not be wearing that here, this is a family restaurant.” Much to his credit, he just stared at me for a few seconds and walked away.

A friend posted on Facebook that he took his little child nephew to the local barbershop only to be greeted with “music” being played therein that was peppered with cuss words. He said, “I hate to be ‘that guy’ but…” Well, I told him of the experience of taking my youngest to a gas station store with me and the same thing happened: the “music” being played included “S” words, “F” words and “N” words. I certainly did not mind being that guy but instantly demanded that it be turned off.

Many have been the times when I find myself with my family at the park, at the playground, at a restaurant, at a children’s soccer game, etc., and have to tell perfect strangers, “Please mind your manners” or “Please mind your language.”

There are very many lessons to be learned from such experiences such as that one reason that many people act that way in public is that no one says anything. Now, many do not say anything because they do likewise and thus, simply do not care. Many because they do not want to be embarrassed, risk a verbal or physical backlash, etc. Yet, surely many because well, they just do not do so for whatever reason (keeping in mind that there is a difference between a reason and an excuse).

Well, I propose that you must speak out and when you do so, you can be as kindly and soft-spoken as they are inconsiderate and loud.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help. Here is my donate/paypal page.

Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Facebook page and/or on my Google+ page.

profanity

Social networks:
My Amazon author’s page
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Archive video site
Ken Ammi’s Product Reviews
My CafePress shop
Google +

Norm Geisler references TrueFreethinker.com:
Apologeticspress.com’s Kyle Butt references TrueFreethinker.com:

Read the article about which Gary Habermas, PhD (Distinguished Research Professor & Chair of the Department of Philosophy at Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary) said, “I have hung on to it since you sent it, & plan to keep doing so”: Historical Jesus – Two Centuries Worth of Citations.

atheist20nothing-cam-7391673