Month: August 2016

The following are samples and examples of Serpent seed of Satan theory in Sethians, Kabbalah, Islam and Moonies. This pertains to the theory about which I have been writing quite a bit, see Serpent Seed of Satan. Sethian refers to a main Gnostic cult of the 2nd-3rd centuries AD. They claim to possess gnosis/knowledge preserved…

The text known as Book of the Apocalypse of Baruch aka 2 Baruch (late 1st or early 2nd century AD) states the following in chap 56: [Adam] became a danger to his own soul: even to the angels. For, moreover, at that time when he was created, they enjoyed liberty. And became he a danger…

This is a continuation from Zen Garcia on symbolic Serpent Seed of Satan language in Genesis 3 since I interacted with serpent seedline of Satan theorist Zen Garcia on the comment section to the video Lucifer Father Of Cain- The evil one’s seed? Zen Garcia on NYSTV (Now You See TV). I noted: Zen and…

Someone chimed in to write this to me: Ken Ammi just a thought to add… when hava gives birth to Cain and says she has gotten a man from the lord.. the Hebrew here for Lord is the Tetragrammaton. I wonder if Zen sees that as an issue.. as it would mean making a case…

I ran across a version of the Geneva Bible’s 1587 AD ed. complied along with notes by Ernest C. Marsh who notes that it is “one of the most historically significant translations of the Bible into the English language, preceding the King James translation by 51 years.” I will quote the text as Marsh has…

If there were another legitimate way to interpret the scene in the garden that wasn’t a sex orgy version, I’d like that very much —Bob Schlenker Herein is the continuation of a review of Bob Schlenker’s article Who is Cain’s Father? Part One the subsequent portions of which we will get to as we continue…

If there were another legitimate way to interpret the scene in the garden that wasn’t a sex orgy version, I’d like that very much —Bob Schlenker Herein is the continuation of a review of Bob Schlenker’s article Who is Cain’s Father? Part One the subsequent portions of which we will get to as we continue…

“Only a Sith deals in absolutes”-Jedi Master Obi-Wan Kenobi Let us begin by answering why we refer to relativism as a faith. We refer to relativism as a faith because it is a faith based belief. Has relativism been proved to be the correct philosophy-world-view? No. However, relativists instantly fall into contradiction by claiming that…

1. There is no God. Islam’s dogmatic statement: There is no God but Allah… Atheism’s dogmatic statement: There is no God. 2. There is no supernatural: no God, no miracles, no soul, no afterlife. 3. The overwhelming majority of the entire planet’s population, regardless of chronology, geography, or theology, have been absolutely wrong about that…

There is a particular argument the effect of which is that it is arrogant to claim exclusivity, in this case, in claiming that only one worldview is true. We should first request an absolute standard for arrogance but will rather cut to the chase: if only one worldview is true then it is not arrogant…