“…Jesus (who was not a Jew but rather of the white Adamic race)… Satan probably appeared to Eve as a handsome white god…
the white race is a race of gods
…”
—Willie Martin
Under consideration is Willie Martin’s Scriptures The One Seedliners Deny. As I noted in Bertrand L. Comparet’s The Cain-Satanic Seed Line in some cases Martin and Comparet plagiarized each other. But then again, serpent seedline of Satan theorists of the Christian Identity variety (who identify themselves thereby as being anti-Semitic racists) quote, paraphrase and plagiarize each other (with attestation or not) since the Bible offers them no support.
The reason I titled this “Willie Martin (and Wesley A. Swift)…” is that at one point Martin writes, “let’s review the teaching of Pastor Wesley A. Swift: What Really Happened in the Garden of Eden?” and due to the formatting of the webpage it is difficult to discern where Martin end, Swift begins, whether Martin is simply quoting Swift, paraphrasing him, intermingling his own and Swift’s claims, etc. In any regard, interested readers can consult my articles on Swift here.
Note that Willie Martin dichotomizes two seedliners such as himself versus one seedliners. However, I reject the two seedline view that has one seedline being from Cain as the son of Eve and Satan and the other being from Seth as the son of Eve and Adam. The Bible does, indeed, teach two seedlines and it is these, biblical ones, to which I hold. These are based on actions and not genetics. Thus, one line are they who commit sinful Satanic actions and the other are they who commit righteous Godly actions. The good news is that since this is not about genetics but about actions those who find themselves in the Satanic line can always repent.
Willie Martin rightly notes that “The first recorded case of incest was when Ham laid with one of the wives of Noah.” Although technically, if that wife was not Ham’s mother then it is not incest. Nevertheless, biblically “the nakedness of his father” as in the Genesis 9 context, refers to just that: a father’s wife (see Deuteronomy 22 and Leviticus 18).
His point however is not biblical accuracy but to justify his assertions such as he made when referring to God, “His people, meaning the White Israel people.” Thus, he concludes, “Ham’s son Canaan was evil from the beginning, and when Esau married into the Canaanite tribes, they became ever more evil, and were the sons of Cain the evil one that produced the Jews.”
Willie Martin’s ultimate motivation for holding to his particular and peculiar two seedline theory is to justify his anti-Semitism and overall racism, “race is at war, with the children of the devil, or Satan as the Scriptures attest.” Interestingly, he writes “Satan, the devil, does have literal children and that they come in all sizes, shapes and colors.” Yet, of course, he looks forward to when “Yahweh will destroy the Jews and all their lap-dogs, boot-licks and heal our land.”
Just as Clifton A. Emahiser constantly argues, Martin claims “Some claim that the two seedline came from the Talmud because it mentions that Eve had sex with an angel, and etc. Yet they never mention that the Bible was written thousands of years BEFORE the Talmud.” Indeed, Genesis was written circa two millennia before the Talmudim yet, Genesis does not teach Martin, et al.’s, version of the two seedlines so this is a moot point.
Willie Martin notes that “The Jewish rabbis” (as if there are Gentile Rabbis), “in reading Genesis 3:15…realized that the scriptures were teaching two seedlines.” Well, only the Rabbis who thought that the scriptures were teaching two seedlines claimed that the scriptures were teaching two seedlines.
For a taste of precisely where Martin is heading note his claim, “Christ had exposed them [Jews] as being the children of Cain…Satan was the father of Cain; who in turn was the father of the Jews.”
Let us consider where, in whatever regards, Martin’s claims intersect with Wesley A. Swift. One or both of them refers to the supposedly false, “assumption that the Fall of white Adamic man in the Garden of Eden was brought on by Eve listening to the manipulative and deceitful words of a literal talking snake and Eve’s eating of a literal piece of fruit…the Fall was brought on by an unholy sexual union between Satan and Eve.”
So we have two big issues with which to deal: “white Adamic man” and “an unholy sexual union.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help. Here is my donate/paypal page.
Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Facebook page and/or on my Google+ page.
Twitter: #Seedlines, #ChristianIdentity, #Racism
Facebook: #Seedlines, #ChristianIdentity, #Racism