Thou Shalt Not Lie
Dan Barker is due to publish a new book entitled, “Godless: How an Evangelical Preacher Became One of America’s Leading Atheists.”
I have not read the book, not run across any reviews, nor any pull-quotes, nor anything to the likes, but I can tell you that we would all do well to consider it to be full of lies.First let me state that I hope that one of these days Dan Barker’s far too oft repeated arguments from authority cease and desist. We find it again in the title of the new book, “Evangelical Preacher.” I would imagine that, at least with the uninformed and too apathetic to become informed, he probably carries a lot of weight to the effect of, “Well, Dan Barker says that the Bible says. And he is an ex-preacher don’t ya know. So he must know what he is talking about. Now he is an atheist, one of America’s leading, so he must really know what the Bible says and why it should be rejected. I’ll take his word for it.”
At least this is the sense that I get. How many atheists who hate the Bible and its God take the time and energy to check what Dan Barker is stating about the Bible and its contents? How many even notice that in one single statement he complains that Jesus “did nothing to alleviate poverty” and then also complains that Jesus said, “Sell everything and give it to the poor”1 (at any rate he is mistaken).
Generally speaking, in order to correct Dan Barker’s statements about the Bible it requires little more than looking up the text, reading it, perhaps reading a few verses above and below the cited text for the sake of context and his errors become obvious. That is reading for grammatical context, some historical and cultural context is also helpful but I am not here referring to esoteric minutia but to very, very basic misunderstandings, misapplications and misinterpretations.If you are actually interested in getting a sense of Dan Barker’s lack of biblical knowledge please see my following essays:
Dan Barker’s Scriptural Misinterpretations and Misapplications
But why do I, in admitted total ignorance of the content of Dan Barker’s new book, suggest considering it to be saturated with lies? No, not inaccuracies, not mistakes, not errors, but straight out lies. Please understand that I am not in the habit of referring to anyone as a liar. This is because to lie is not merely to state something that is not true but knowing that you are stating something that is not true. In order to know, for certain, the a person is purposefully stating something which they know is not true requires more than mere guess work, you would have to know their thoughts and motivation (unless, for example, your corrected someone and they kept repeating a falsehood or something of the sort).
Yet, in this case I made the claim because Dan Barker’s “ethics” force me to make the claim as a logical conclusion. How so? I personally appreciate the manner in which Kyle Butt has so succinctly stated it in his article, What “We All Know” About a Lie. In it he makes the following point regarding the relative morals for which Dan Barker argues:
“Putting Dan Barker’s statements together in logical form:(1) he considers it moral to lie in order to ‘protect someone from harm;'(2) he considers religion to be harmful;
(3) then it must follow that Dan Barker would lie in order to dissuade a person from believing in God or religion.”
Do you know what the Talmud states is the punishment for a liar?
“The punishment of the liar is that even when he tells the truth he is not believed.”2
Also see, To Lie, or Not To Lie: That is the Question The Dan Barker-Reginald Finley-Matthew Davis Fiasco
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help. Here is my donate/paypal page.
Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Facebook page and/or on my Google+ page.