Within my article Occult Hollywood Numerology – the number 11 in movies I elucidated how occultists, by any other name, view the number 11 as being most indicative of their craft.
Therein, I noted:
In the Harry Potter movie series, based on books by J. K. Rowling, Harry’s magickal wand is 11 inches long. Also, magickians employ pentagrams-five pointed stars and hexagrams-six pointed stars (5+6=11): Harry consists of five letters and Potter of six.
Also, Rowling added the “K” to her name as an initial that does not refer to a middle name: K is the 11th letter of the English alphabet. FYI: people who are serious about the occult (or about exposing the occult) spell the word magic with a K which is a manner whereby to distinguish it from stage illusion acts.
The mythos of Harry Potter reflects actual beliefs of occult magickians in various was. One example is that it teaches children an us vs. them mentality as actual occultists refer to non-magickians as the “vulgar” and other such terms. Within the Potter tales non-magickians are “Muggle” and within the movie they are called “No-Maj.”
We now come to the 2016 AD movie Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them which is a styled prequel to the Potter series. It was directed by David Yates and stars Eddie Redmayne as Newt Scamander, Katherine Waterston as Tina, Alison Sudol as Queenie, Dan Fogler as Kowalski, Colin Farrell as Graves, et al.
The movie is none but a full frontal assault on Christianity and as apologetic for witchcraft.
In essence, witches are good ol’ Earth mommas, as some term it, meaning they are merely tapping into natural forces. Even when they, for example, destroy large portions of a city, that’s okay ’cause they can just wave their magick wand and fix it.
Within the movie there is a group called “The Second Salem” which I am sure 99% of all kids watching it did not catch. Indeed, this refers to a styled second persecution of witches, the first of which a pop-myth has taken place in Salem, Mass.—for facts on what was really a literal class warfare case, listen to the Bill Honsberger lecture Why Not Burn Witches?
Thus, “The Second Salem” are not referred to as “Christians” but are portrayed in that manner: they preach on streets, hand out tracts, run a soup kitchen, etc. The head of the group is a woman who abuses her children.
The last point to note is that the movie is premised upon the existence of what is basically a J.K. Rowling manner whereby to refer to demons and possession. Now, within real life as well as the Potter mythos there are natural born witches—some claiming that everyone has the basic ability but some need to be taught how to more than others. Within the movie it is very dangerous for a witch to not practice witchcraft since that causes the manifestation of an obscurus or obscurial. Thus, this is a sort of reverse-exorcism—or something; it reminds me of the Beetlejuice’s movie’s reference to a bio-exorcism.
Reading into it I would say that a witch is possessed and the demon is only happy at home as long as the witch continues practicing magick, if they do not then the demon acts out. This is tantamount to the Philip Pullman Golden Compass mythos, which admittedly is about “killing God,” wherein having a daemon is a good thing (which Pullman re-envisions as an external manifestation of inner-self which takes an animal form).
In any case, the obscurus can possess and destroy its host body. Well, as it turns out the older son of the head of the Christian “Second Salem” is one repressed dude as he has the most powerful case of obscurial repression disorder ever.
Thus, the point is that this Christian hypocrite is possessed, is possessed due to being a natural born witch who is repressing his natural gift due to his overbearing Christian mother and his only salvation is to be taught how to exercise his occult powers.
This is why if you allow your children to view such movies a reply of “Fine” or “I liked it” or “It was good” when you ask “How was it” is not enough. Rather, have them engage in critical worldview-philosophy-theology thinking.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Of interest might be: Richard Dawkins vs. Harry Potter – Battle of the Wizards
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help. Here is my donate/paypal page.
Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Facebook page and/or on my Google+ page. You can also use the “Share / Save” button below this post.