“Skeptic Arena” Atheist claims “you worship an evil, invisible, butchering monster” 9 of 9

That which follows is a discussion I had with a certain Neo from the The (pseudo) Skeptic Arena with whom I have had many interactions all of which, including this parsed one, you can find here.

Picking up where we left off, Neo replied

Ken Ammi wrote:
Friend, you are so very eager to avoid the issue that now you want to play grammar police or something.

That which follows is a discussion I had with a certain Neo from the The (pseudo) Skeptic Arena with whom I have had many interactions all of which, including this parsed one, you can find here.

Picking up where we left off, Neo replied

Ken Ammi wrote:
Friend, you are so very eager to avoid the issue that now you want to play grammar police or something.
Ken, that’s the same response I always get from semi-literates who get embarrassed when their lack of education is highlighted in front of everyone. But it isn’t just a lack of education Ken. As I pointed out in the last email, it is mostly due to nothing more than mental laziness. You have access to spelling checkers and grammar helpers and all kinds of resources that you are simply too lazy to utilize.
I tell you that I am dyslexic and that English is my second language
Ken, crying in your Cheerios is only going to bring laughter and ridicule, not only from me, but from the cc list as well. Neither of those excuses prevent you from accessing the resources I listed above. You are simply too lazy to do it.
So you can save the tears.
and rather than empathy your response is to launch a personal attack upon me.
Ken, correcting your sloppy, lazy, and poorly thought-out responses is not a personal attack but simply an extremely accurate observation.
Instead of playing the abused puppy dog, you would be better served to take it as constructive criticism and work on improving yourself so that you humiliate yourself … less often.
Presenting yourself as a grammatically-challenged head case is probably not the best way to convince people to send you money.
Well, as I noted: your goal was to base your life on spreading hatred and you have succeeded in that regard.
Ken, your reading comprehension skills rival the incompetency of your English skills in general. I said nothing about spreading hatred, but using hatred.
Maybe you should direct all your future correspondence to dyslexics, like yourself, who speak your first language?
The problem with using hatred as a fuel is that it is a dangerous and unstable fuel and burn you up every time you use it.
Ken, in most cases you would probably be right. But you have committed the Generalization Fallacy. And how could it burn me up every time I use it? If I burn up once … how do I restore myself in order to burn up again? See what I mean Ken? Debating you is like teasing a kitten with a laser pen … only less challenging.
Now, with that bit of hand waving from you out of the way, how about actually dealing with the issue at hand. I asked you to “simply send me the quotations from your previous replies” and you are simply unable to since you have failed time and again to justify your condemnations. This means that they are not even condemnations but mere emotivism.
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz (Sports Fans: This dude could bore the Ebola virus out of a safari guide)
I also ask you to prove that I “‘tried to defend David Wood’: please simply send me the quotations from when I did so” and you are simply unable to. Yet, I kept the record and that which you claimed simply does not exist.
Ken, when am I going to get those tickets to that cage match between you two? And also, did you forward my last email to him, like I asked? When Wood hasn’t got a hammer in his hand to bash old men over the head with, the Chicken [****] Little Freak runs to his “Safe Space” like a delicate little Snow Flake.
Now, you are making a fundamental mistake: I am not asking you to explain to me why murdering innocent babies is wrong. Rather, you have to explain to me why you think that murdering innocent babies is wrong. So, let us try it this way: I, Neo, believe that murdering innocent babies is wrong because _______________ (simply fill in the blank).
Ken, look at the hole you’ve dug yourself into. You took one of the most insane positions in debate history, and when you realized just how badly you [****]ed up in front of everyone, you thought to yourself
“I know, rather than admit that I screwed up, I’ll double-down and just keep repeating it over and over until everyone gets bored and goes away. Yeah, that’s the ticket. Then everyone will forget that I made the worst mistake ever recorded and I’ll still be able to keep begging for money.”
Ken, you worship an evil, invisible, butchering monster. It is no surprise to anyone that you can’t defend His evil. No one in their right mind would even try. And there’s the catch, Ken … no one in their right mind would even try.
But the fact that you do, ensures that you will always be remembered as the second most dishonest man in America … right behind David Barton.
BOOM!
And Ken goes down! I think this might be it folks. You might want to start heading for the exits.

It appears that in the Word doc where I was pasting our discussion, I am missing my reply to him at this point yet, Neo replied

Hey Sports Fans,
Ken has refused to condemn the murder of innocent babies by his God and has demanded repeatedly that I explain why I think God is evil for murdering innocent babies. Looky at what I found …
https://truefreethinker.com/abortion
BOOM! BOOM! BOOM! BOOM! BOOM! BOOM!
BOOM! BOOM! BOOM! BOOM! BOOM! BOOM!
BOOM! BOOM! BOOM! BOOM! BOOM! BOOM!
And Ken goes down! It’s over! The fight is over!
Even David Barton, “The Most Dishonest Man In America,” would have to concede that Ken is a serious challenger to his title.
GAME … SET … AND MATCH!
neo
(side note for Sports Fans: What do you notice when you follow the link to Ken’s web site above, right at the top of the page, on the right hand side? That’s right, Ken begging for money. Now what do you see when you scroll down past the images that proclaim how much babies lives now suddenly matter to Ken? That’s right, Ken begging for more money again).
Ken, you should get one of those images that follow your visitors around, wherever they go on your site – one that begs for money. Oh wait, you don’t need to; you already have your plea posted everywhere they go. Even Creflo Dollar could learn a few tricks from you, Ken.

Ken Ammi

Neo, I have made it this simple for you as per my previous email, “let us try it this way: I, Neo, believe that murdering innocent babies is wrong because _______________ (simply fill in the blank).”
Of the on record dozens of times I have asked you for your reason, you have proved yourself to be unable to fill in this simple blank.
Please do so and only then we can get around to whether I agree or disagree, condemn or justify and only then can we get to the category error you made in this email.

And that was that since, at least on this point, he failed to reply.

While you are at it, see my book Pop-Atheist Bible Expositors starring Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris, Dan Barker, and Neil deGrasse Tyson and also my book Reasons for Being An Atheist: A Comprehensive Guide

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help. Here is my donate page.

Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Facebook page and/or on my Google+ page. You can also use the “Share / Save” button below this post.