Undergoing consideration is what appears to be a number of writings that have been mashed together into a PDF titled I Will Give You The Keys To The Kingdom Of Heaven that was written by self-styled neo-prophet Jonathan Kleck—note that, “the Prophets were until John” the Baptist (Luke 16:16).
He begins by stating, “The biggest trick Satan ever pulled is keeping people (us angels) in the dark and having us believe he doesn’t even exist. This is the greatest identity crises ever. We are angels and don’t even know it.”
I will say that one of the biggest trick Satan ever pulled is get a guy to believe that people are Angels—and getting people to actually believe him, in turn.
Kleck begins his evidencing by merely asserting, “Satan and the rebel angels created these human host bodies to trap us (our light essence) on earth. The human host body is an illusion, an Idol, a lie, as is the host body / system, the whole earth that Satan helped create.”
Incidentally, the assertion that people, humans, are Angels is actually an old false theory that was held, for example, by the heretical Cathar sect which was based on neo-Manichaean—referring to the Gnostic cult (thank you for the tip JDS).
Now, we can believe that or, we can believe Gen 1:26, “Then God said, ‘Let us make man in our image, after our likeness” and Jesus said, “Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female.” (Mat 19:4).
Thus, Kleck has attributed to Satan what was done by God.
Worse still, this implies that when Jesus incarnated, He incarnated in the image of Satan, in the image of a trap created by Satan and rebel Angels, into an illusion, an idol, a lie—in my book The Trinity Texts: : Does the Bible contain Trinitarian Theology and if so where? I included chapters on texts that very specifically attribute creation to each person of the Trinity thus, to God.
Yet, Gen 1:27 notes, “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.”
Jesus stated, “a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh…So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate” (Mat 19:5-6).
Have you noticed that Kleck asserted, “people (us angels)” were created by rebel Angels but that would mean that Angels would have had to preexist their existence in order to create themselves before they exited which his as incoherent as it sounds?
He calls humans, “eternal angels” by which I can only imagine he means the human and Angel eternality is having come into being at a certain point in time and not God’s eternity which is having exited forever in what we call the past, present, and future.
So, he merely asserts that eternal angel bodies were created but that, “we are from the Lord God, eternal angels; messengers of flaming fire with bodies of LIGHT.”
I am unsure what, “bodies of LIGHT” are since, by definition, bodies are physical, being composed of minerals, amino acids, liquids, tissue, etc., etc., etc. but light is wave and particle.
In any case, Jonathan Kleck merely asserts, “We fell from heaven into these human host bodies of flesh through birthing and our DNA is our chains of darkness” yet, Jude and 2 Peter 2 combined refer to a sin of Angels, place that sin to pre-flood days and correlate it to sexual sin which occurred after the Angels, “left their first estate,” after which they were incarcerated, and there’s only a one-time fall/sin of Angels in the Bible.
Gen 1:28 states, “And God blessed them. And God said to them, ‘Be fruitful and multiply…” yet, the unauthorized Kleck version would have that as, “And Satan and rebel Angels cursed them. And Satan and rebel Angels said to them, ‘Be fruitful and multiply…”
Thus, again, Kleck attributes to Satan and rebel Angels what was done and said by God.
He then elucidates, “Satan and the rebel angels are not us. They are the Angels that fell first from the rebellion Satan started in heaven. They fell into a Pre-Adamic earth and populated it and the rest of us angels fell after them and continued breeding more angels into the flesh for them below.”
Well, the, “rebellion Satan started in heaven” resulted in his fall during the Gen 3 timeline and then resulted in that he cast one third of Angels during the Gen 6 timeline (Rev 12, also see Daniel 8).
Thus, neither fell during some un-biblical fantasy, “Pre-Adamic earth” and thus, Earth was not populated by those Angels nor populated by merely alleged supposed, “us angels” who, “fell after them” at some un-elucidated time.
Jonathan Kleck then invented some fancy sci-fi sounding stuff about that, “the Lord God allows his angels to use His commands or codes to create. Satan stole the Lord Gods codes of life and used them to create abominable things in this world, even the Pre-Adamic man and beast of various kinds” all for which there is literally zero indication—they did not get the cheat code.
Thus, Kleck has it that, “after the rebellion in heaven, Satan and the rebel angels were cast out of heaven and down to earth” but he is inventing a commencing timeline, is mashing together two falls (the Cherub Satan’s and the Angels’) and is ignoring that biblically, there is only a one-time sin/fall of Angels (and the Gen 6 affair was it).
Recall what I noted above regarding, “Jude and 2 Peter 2 combined…”
Yet, Kleck merely asserts, “Satan and the rebel angels fell into EVERLASTING chains of darkness and will not be coming back to heaven” yet, Jude and 2 Peter 2 only refer to Angels, not to the Cherub Satan. And as for, “not be coming back to heaven” Rev 12:7 notes, “war arose in heaven, Michael and his angels fighting against the dragon. And the dragon and his angels fought back” which is a post-Jesus’ ascension event after His resurrection (Rev 12:5).
Yet, recall that Jonathan Kleck decided to merely assert that chains means DNA thus, “The rest of us angels fell into chains of darkness of the flesh (DNA) but they are not everlasting and we can come back home.”
Note that to him, being embodied, in the flesh, incarnated, is a sin performed by Satan and rebel Angels but, again, biblically it was the purposeful doing of God which is part of why Jesus incarnated, resurrected physically, and remains physically incarnated forever thereafter. Thus, Kleck is teaching straight up Gnosticism whereby flesh, physicality, the material creation is evil and only spirit is pure, holy, etc.
Jonathan Kleck goes on to note, “Satan…not only owns but also controls our flesh bodies, known as the qliphoth” which means that he is also teaching Rabbinic Judaism’s mysticism: Kabbalah. While originally said to be creations God to serve as containers of holiness, latter Kabbalism claimed that qliphoth are corruptions of attributes/emanations of God, being the byproducts of God failing to create a perfect universe, etc.
Kleck refers to, “the Lord God’s children, everyone in this world, His angels trapped in the serpent flesh.” He then plays off of fallacious theology proper by asserting, “This is why our father came into the earth which is the Matrix (Womb) system of the flesh” yet, it was not the father who incarnated (in, “serpent flesh,” mind you) but Jesus, His son.
He then moved on to that, “there are two world ages and the second world age is now at its end. We are entering the third world age which is in the final phase of the New World Order (NWO)” and thereafter, he includes seven instances of, “(Reference: Zen Garcia)” which is not surprising at all since Garcia also teaches Gnosticism—and other un-biblical fallacies, see my posts about Garcia.
Now, here is were the un-biblical cosmology mythos is elucidated: on the combo Kleck/Garcia view, “the 1st world age was” when, “Satan and the rebel angels…created Pre-Adamic man” and, “The 2nd world age” was, “when the rest of us angels started falling from grace to earth.”
Kleck/Garcia merely assert, “Satan seduced Eve into having sex with him and then Eve seduced Adam as well” which, by definition, would mean they both had sex with Satan since this claim (which historically barely even makes a blip on the theological radar) has it that tree, fruit, eating, etc., are all symbolic of sex and Adam ate of the same fruit from the same tree as Eve—such aberrant sexual fantasies tell us about those who make such claims but nothing about history—see my book Cain as Serpent Seed of Satan, vol. II: Considering Zen Garcia’s Claims.
Now, since Gen 4:1 is crystal clear, “Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived and bore Cain, saying, ‘I have gotten a man with the help of the Lord,’” Kleck/Garcia can not allow God to reveal that which occurred as it occurred so they merely artificially insert this into God’s Word, “Eve birthed Cain and Abel who were twins from different fathers, which is known as superfecundation. Cain’s father was Satan and Abel’s father was Adam.”
Interestingly, they merely assert, “Cain was the first born and first debased (corrupted) man that was created on earth” that is even after telling us about how debased Adam and Eve were since they sinned before Cain was even born.
We then come to a mashup of category error and thus, fallacious biology as they merely assert, “Since Satan was his father, Cain was a fallen angel and a Nephilim.” Again, Satan is a Cherub, there is zero indication that Cherubim (we only know of one fallen one) ever mated with humans, ergo Cain was not part Cherub nor a Nephil since Nephilim were half-Angel.
Kleck/Garcia continue with, “Afterwards 200 angels called the watchmen, who came to earth on Mt. Herman” this is playing off of 1 Enoch which is Bible contradicting folklore from centuries, if not millennia, after the Torah, see my book, “In Consideration of the Book(s) of Enoch.” It is also not watchmen: the Second Temple Era (516 BC-70 AD) for Angel is Watcher. And, it is also not Herman but Hermon.
They merely assert, “Cain, the fallen angels, and the watchman created more abominations like the Nephilim giants that roamed the earth in those days along with the many abominable beasts.”
Biblically contextually, “Nephilim giants” means, “Nephilim Nephilim” so key questions are: what is the usage of the vague, generic, subjective, multi-usage and modern English word, “giants” in English Bibles? What is their usage? Do those two usages agree?
After two pages, the PDF includes the Introduction which assures us, “The information provided in this document has been given by the Lord God to his servant Jonathan Kleck, Who has been chosen (predestined) to ring the bell and gather the church of Philadelphia.”
After putting his name, not, “the Lord God,” in bold font, he goes on to say, “This is my humble attempt in conveying the intended meaning of this information in written form.”
Thus, he pretends to have received personal, private, secret revelation directly from the Lord God—even though Jude referenced, “the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints” and not, with more to come over two millennia later.
Jonathan Kleck follows directly with what he claims is, “the hidden knowledge of the truth, given by the Lord God…all the information in this document is revelation given to the Lord God’s church” and, note this, “all of it is true and consistent with scripture in the bible” which instantly discredits him, as we have seen.
Yet, he seems to have sought an out, as it were, since he hides behind, “This information in part, is the hidden knowledge of the truth revealed in the end days (Colossians 1:26), the unrolled scroll (Daniel 12:4) and the keys to the kingdom of heaven (Matthew 16:19).” That way, he can claim whatever he wants and claim that he is finally reveling, as he quotes them, “Colossians 1:26 New American Standard Bible (NASB) 26 that is, the mystery which has been hidden from the past ages and generations, but has now been manifested to His saints.”
And, “Daniel 12:4 (KJV) 4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.”
And, “Matthew 16:19 King James Version 2000 (KJV2000) 19 And I will give unto you the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever you shall bind on earth shall be what has been bound in heaven: and whatsoever you shall loose on earth shall be what has been loosed in heaven.”
It is interesting that he jumps from the NASB to the KJV to the KJV2000: I find that this modus operandi generally denotes a person desperately seeking versions that will say what they already want to hear, in an eisegesis manner.
Yet, those texts do not allow for someone to flat out contradict the Bible and teach Gnosticism and Kabbalah and merely assert he is revealing, “the mystery…now been manifested” (with that, “now” referring to two millennia ago, of course, which Kleck missed) “the book” for, “the time of the end” and that Kleck is the one who received, “the keys of the kingdom of heaven.”
Interestingly, that which Satan does is a copy but corrupt version of that which God does: Satan just turns everything upside-down, inside out, and backward.
Well, Jonathan Kleck has a subsection titled, “The Prince Of The Power Of The Air, Those Who Hide Their Plans From The Lord” wherein he quotes (in part highlighting in green, in part yellow, some font being black, some red—for whatever reasons), “Isaiah 29:15 (KJV) 15 Woe unto them that seek deep to hide their counsel from the LORD, and their works are in the dark, and they say, Who seeth us? and who knoweth us? 16 Surely your turning of things upside down shall be esteemed as the potter’s clay: for shall the work say of him that made it, He made me not? or shall the thing framed say of him that framed it, He had no understanding?”
Based on that, he figures that if he turns things upside-down, he can discern Satanic imagery—which is really just a window into Kleck’s delusions.
He wrote, “Below is an image of a dead sheep that Satan hid in an image of the virgin. The following image shows life right side up and death upside down”:
Next, he provides us, “Excerpt from article” without bothering to cite article in any way. It is basically a neo-theo sci-fi claim about that, “Satan is the prince of the power of the air reveals” that is referring to, “Radio, television and other modes of communication are broadcast through the air” so that, “Satan influences humanity by broadcasting…tuned to his wavelength,” etc.
Seeking to elucidate, “the knowledge that we are all actually angels,” which, “has been hidden from the world” but revealed to him, “let’s do a little bible study” but, “let’s consistently match the Hebrew and Greek word /s originally used in the bible with their true meanings” and only Kleck is qualified to determine, “their true meanings” since he received personal, private, secret revelation so no mere mortal is qualified to challenge him.
He urges us to, “Then read the scripture…replacing the word /s in the scripture with the definition of the word /s that were matched” which means that he is determined what a word should read based on an isolated definition and then forces that definition into texts regardless of the individual usages of words: in order words, he is taking texts out of context to make pretexts for prooftexts.
It is hermeneutically invalid to demand that any given word can only have one single meaning, definition, or usage since all languages function exactly the opposite way: any given word, or phrase can refer to more than one thing and any one thing can be referred to in various ways.
In this case, he references Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance—it is just me or is that odd for someone who is receiving personal, private, secret revelation directly from God?
But first, he asserts, “If the Lord God is our Father and the almighty King and we are His children. Then by definition, that makes us His angels” which is a non-sequitur since keep in mind that this has not been about the usage of the term angels merely meaning any messenger, including human ones (such as human preachers of the evangel) but about ontology: the very nature and essence of a being.
The Psalm is referring to the one Almighty Elohim speaking to various lower/lesser elohim.
He then quotes Jesus, “John 10:34-38 (KJV)…34Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are godsG2316? 35 If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken; 36 Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God? 37 If I do not the works of my Father, believe me not. 38 But if I do, though ye believe not me, believe the works: that ye may know, and believe, that the Father is in me, and I in him.”
And notes that the Strong’s word in question is, “Theos, theh’-os” referring to, “deity…the supreme Divinity; figuratively a magistrate.”
From that, Kleck concludes, “we are royal princes, angels that fell from heaven. When we fell, we were birthed into the MatrixH7358. The MatrixH7358 is a carnal state, in the realm of the flesh. Our fall is being birthed into a flesh host body of the serpent skin and as it says in the word of God, definitively, ‘but you shall die like men.’” Thus, he is merely asserting that they, “unto whom the word of God came” refers to all humans and that, partly based on a word he had not mentioned yet, which is matrix in terms of the womb.
One issue is that the lower/lesser elohim will, “die like men” so they are not ontological (hu)men and if they are not men then who are they, in Jonathan Kleck’s mythos.
Recall that he keeps attributing to Satan and rebel Angels that which was done by God—as confirmed by Jesus, mind you—well, having merely asserted that elohim refers to (humans) Angels, he then applies his own assertions to his own arguments and concludes that Gen 1:26-27 is not God speaking, but of that, “Satan and the rebel angels created this human host body…in their image, meaning in the serpent flesh and from the beginning, they commanded us to breed and multiply for them.”
So now, Cherubim look like humans even though as per Ezek chaps 1 and 10, they most certainly do not.
The Apostle Paul noted, “he made from one man every nation of mankind…that they should seek God…Being then God’s offspring” which Kleck would have us misread as, “Satan and rebel Angels made from one man every nation of mankind…that they should seek Satan and rebel Angels…Being then Satan’s and rebel Angels’ offspring.”
Kleck then includes this, “Below is an image of the human flesh under a micro scope that matches serpent scales” which is as incoherent as it looks.
He wrote, “Below is an image of the human flesh under a micro scope that matches serpent scales”:
Even if he subjectively thinks they look alike that does not mean that they are related or to be correlated in the way he means it. Serpent scales are made of keratin but human skin is not. Also, why, “serpent skin” and what do, “serpent scales” have to do with anything considering that Ezekiel’s actual description of Cherubim and the many descriptions of Angels do not even hint at anything serpentine whatsoever. He must be merely assuming that the serpent in the garden of Eden as a literal reptilian and yet, Rev chaps 12 and 20 elucidate that such is just a symbolic reference, “the great dragon…that ancient serpent, who is called the devil and Satan.”
At this point, Jonathan Kleck circles back to, “Knowledge Of The Qliphoth” and openly admits that he is teaching not based on God’s personal, private, secret revelation to him but rather as per, “the Kabbalah Judaism esoteric teachings.”
Yet, he merely asserts, “the qliphoth represents our human host body…The qliphoth is unholy…qliphoth (human host body) is inherently evil.”
Now, be mindful that it may be easy for Christians to agree with, “our human host body…is unholy…(human host body) is inherently evil” because we are fallen. Yet, that it is inherently evil is Gnostic since on that view the very fact of the existence of flesh, physicality, materliality is corruption since only spirit is pure and holy.
They teach that a false, lower, lesser, arrogant, senile god created matter and that is what ontologically makes matter corrupt, unholy. Yet, the biblical view is that the one true Most High Almighty God created matter, which includes our bodies made in His image, that we fell, that Jesus incarnated in that material flesh, and redeemed us—as is—with physicality being thereafter eternal.
He then refers us to, “The metaphysical science and mystical art of manipulating and altering matter…to accomplish transmutation. In alchemy the human transmutation circle within our host body (shell), converts our angelic energy to dark energy through constant sin.”
Kleck then all but trails off about, “the Lucifer Star Polygon…the Isotoxal star” the quora star, the convex hexagon, a polytope which leads to something about, “Hendecagram And Goddess Of Liberty” regarding New York’s Statue of Liberty. I am afraid that is all a bit too in the weeds when my contextual focus is the issue of whether humans are Angels. Never letting a chance to turn something into something different to make a point about something go by untapped, Kleck wrote, “For the moment, let us refer to Satan as a she for goddess liberty.”
Most of that was to play upon geometric shapes and to imply that virtually anything flame/torch related is Satanic since Satan is the, “light-bearer.”
Thus, he also turns the, “Spark Of Life” into something Satanic since, “Satan created the female energy system that we’re in” and since, “scientist discovered that at the moment the female egg is fertilized, in proportion to the egg, a huge spark occurs” then that is also Satanic to the point that he actually wrote, “Sperm entering into a portal from heaven to the realm of the flesh, the matrix (the woman’s womb) Genesis 1:2” with that verse reading, “The earth was without form and void, and darkness was over the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters” which has something to do with heavenly sperm portals and not about the whole context of Gen 1 which is the creation of the universe, the Earth, and that which it contains.
He then trails off regrading mitochondria and actually wrote of Revelation’s, “woman arrayed in purple and scarlet” that, “When reading on the Woman Arrayed in Purple below, take note of the colors Red and Blue in the HEART” and provided this colored illustration of a human heart:
FYI: the human heart is not actually this color, which I cannot believe I have to point out.
But what, you may ask, does that say for the fact that the text actually states, “woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet, and adorned with gold and precious stones and pearls, having in her hand a golden cup” well, you are clearly over-thinking facts: he can either utterly ignore data points that do not fit into his mere assertions or can turn them into that which he wills—if he discerned any usage he may get out of them.
He argues that, “Regarding the scripture, 4 The woman was arrayed in purpleG4209. When we combine the colors red and blue we get purple” and that means, “The revelation that the Lord revealed is that we (angels in host body) are the woman arrayed in purple and scarlet and we are controlled by the female energy”—no, nothing about, “gold and precious stones and pearls, having in her hand a golden cup,” since those data points are useless to him.
Jonathan Kleck merely asserts, “In Revelation 17, the woman arrayed in purple represents our human host body. When our veins and arteries are put together we become arrayed in the color purple” which is just mixing color together, that is not what happens in human bodies so that is a category error. Worse still, in Rev 17:18 we are told who, what, the woman is and it is not our bodies, “the woman that you saw is the great city that has dominion over the kings of the earth.”
He then trails off about, “Male And Female Chromosomes” regarding, “Satan masquerades as mother Goddess, the female energy” and a stunning revelation that, “linguistically and semantically the word FEMALE was intentionally made to parallel the word MALE” since, apparently, not one has yet to notice that female is a word made by adding fe to male. But, of course he cannot leave it at that but asserts that, “the FE-male energy that we war with in our human host body that keeps us in constant sin and eventually converts our eternal angelic energy to dark energy” in part since, “In science the periodic table for elements for the letters FE is IRON” and that has something to do with, “Daniel 2:43-44 (KJV) – Iron mixed with Clay…And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay. And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever.”
Jonathan Kleck asserts that, “In this scripture Daniel is saying, the two energies or seed lines (seed of the serpent and seed of the woman) shall not cleave one to another…male and FE-male energies, also the enmity that the Lord God placed between the two seeds lines.”
For support, Kleck quotes, “Targum Of Jonathan – Genesis ‘And the Lord God made to Adam and to his wife vestures of honour from the skin of the serpent, which he had cast from him, upon the skin of their flesh, instead of that adornment which had been cast away; and He clothed them.’”
Simply stated, this merely refers to two people groups that will engage in commerce but will not intermarry—see my whole chapter on this issue in my book What Does the Bible Say About Giants and Nephilim? A Styled Giantology and Nephilology.
What Kleck did not bother noting is that Targum Of Jonathan a.k.a. Targum of Jonathan Ben Uzziel a.k.a. Targum Pseudo Jonathan a.k.a. Targum of Palestine a.k.a. Jerusalem Targum (got that?) dates to circa half a millennia after Jesus’ time on Earth and is utterly saturated with Rabbinic folklore—see my article Serpent seedline of Satan in Zen Garcia’s book “The Aramaic and Palestinian Targums.”
Another open wide window into Kleck’s Gnosticism is that he asserts, “Since one energy is of the Lord God (Male) and the other of Satan (Female). It causes a duality, a duplicitous nature that keeps us separated from our father.” This is the stuff of which much occultism is made since claims such as that the gender binary was the doing of, in this case, Satan and rebel Angels has been in occult literature for millennia—see my book The Occult Roots of Postgenderism: And a History of Changes to Psychiatry and Psychology.
Again, the actual, real, one true Almighty God created humans male and female—purposefully and in His image, as Jesus affirmed.
Yet, Kleck asserts, “Adam and Eve did not have Satan’s seed in their host bodies when they fell from paradise to earth. They were created by the Lord God, not birthed on earth as we were” even though as per Gen 1, they were created on Earth.
God literally made Adam from the stuff of the Earth, Gen 2 refers to, “the earth…the earth…the earth…the field…the land…the field…the land…the ground…the land…the ground…the Lord God formed the man of dust from the ground.”
Kleck continues by referring to, “Through Satan having sex with Eve…and subsequent pact with the watchman, the angels that had sex with the woman of men, continued the debasement of ‘man’ (originally angels)…Through the co-mingling of the fallen angels with humans, a hybrid species was produced at the genetic level…This is exactly what is stated in the bible in Genesis 6” which he does not take as referring to the sons of the one true God but rather, the sons of his version of elohim.
He quotes v. 2 thusly, “That the sons of GodH430 [אֹלִהים,’ĕlôhı̂ym, el-o-heemˈ] saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.”
He ties that in with the contextually/biologically irrelevant, “Genesis 3:15…‘I will put enmity between the seed of the woman and the seed of the serpent.’”
After asserting, “the abomination that causes desolation is the alien seed otherwise the serpent seed that is growing within us, which is the female energy that is consuming the male energy” he moves on to a section titled, “The Antichrist Barack Obama” wherein he assures us, “It has been revealed to the Lord God’s saints,” whoever that is, “that the last president known as Barak Hussein Obama is the biblical Antichrist, who Satan will take over and completely possess his body. At that time, Satan will manifest and Obama will come out of the shadows and rule for the time permitted by the Lord God. With the promise of peace, he will bring about death and destruction.”
The issue is when will, “that time” be? Well, he wrote, “Satan will take over and completely possess his body” followed by, “At that time, Satan will manifest and Obama will come out of the shadows and rule for the time permitted by the Lord God. With the promise of peace, he will bring about death and destruction.”
So, “that time” refers to when, “Satan will take over and completely possess his body” but he didn’t get around to the most important part: when will that be?
See, being vague is a trait of false prophecy since we have to wait until Obama passes away to confirm that Kleck was mistaken—and yet, he can always merely assert that we need to await his resurrection (whenever that may be—stand by).
Let us make a deal, I will skip that part until I see that Obama comes out of the shadows and rule as antichrist.
I will pick up the action with Jonathan Kleck’s assertion that, “The bible states that we are angels of light, messengers of flaming fire” followed by quotations that state no such thing.
He begins with, “Hebrews 1:7 (KJV) 7 And of the angelsG32 he saith, Who maketh his angelsG32 spiritsG4151, and his ministers a flameG5395 of fireG4442.”
Note that he myopically selected one version that has Angels as spirits which here, you can find 44 English versions that have them as winds. And the difference in translation is not due to flipping a translational coin but rather, that Heb 1 is quoting, and then playing off of, Psalm 104:4 which due to its context should rightly be translated as winds rather than spirits since the Psalm’s context is constant references to natural phenomena.
In fact, the definition/meaning/usage that he provides includes, “Bible definitions of Strong’s Greek word spiritsG4151…From G4154; a current of air, that is, breath (blast) or a breeze.
Fascinatingly, he followed that up with, “To reiterate this point a little differently”: since it still does not say what he eisegetically wants to hear so he has to artificially insert his assertions into the text somehow. And the only slightly, “little differently” is, “For those angels who do not become CONVERTED in Christ, through the Holy Spirit. When their host body (shell) dies on earth, their eternal angel energy called the soul becomes food for the locusts below and they get a Locust for a new host body” well, such is the KJV: Kleck Jejune Version.
Apparently, “Converting Angels To Locusts” is a simple process which Kleck illustrates thusly:
Premised on a myopic and incorrect translation of one word, he throws is a little, “laws of physics in Thermodynamics is that energy can neither be destroyed nor created but it can be converted” and we get, “Our angelic light energy soul transmutated into dark energy for the Locust host body below.”
After all, “In scripture, Revelation 9 describes what the locusts are like” and yet, as he goes on to quote it, it is not about locusts but about some level of likeness to locusts—and many other features—which is how Angels being released from the Abyss in Rev 9 are described (emphasis in the following quote has been added by me to denote the many other features), “Revelation 9:7-10 (KJV) 7 And the shapes of the locusts were like unto horses prepared unto battle; and on their heads were as it were crowns like gold, and their faces were as the faces of men. 8 And they had hair as the hair of women, and their teeth were as the teeth of lions. 9 And they had breastplates, as it were breastplates of iron; and the sound of their wings was as the sound of chariots of many horses running to battle. 10 And they had tails like unto scorpions, and there were stings in their tails: and their power was to hurt men five months.”
The bottom line is that locusts here denote a hoard which destructively consumes—see chapter, “Sons of God” in my book What Does the Bible Say About Angels? A Styled Angelology wherein I chase down every symbol to earlier portions in the Bible to demonstrate that these are all symbolic representations and what they represent.
To make a point about this, Jonathan Kleck demonstrates another delusion of his via a photo of the Vatican’s, “plaque called the list of popes” which, get this, “when you turn the plaque for the list of Popes upside down, the plaque reveals and represent what the locust from the pit will look like” and this he uses, “to prove man turns to locust in the pit, just as the bible says”:
He even asserts that when we turn the face upside down, the mouth/teeth become a crown—etc., etc., etc.
But that is not all, in another PDF titled The FINAL Case Against Lucifer, he provided these subjective interpretations of Vatican artistry (that PDF is a very, very disturbing window into a very troubled mind’s literal delusions):
But that is not all, given his mere assertion that, “Satan created the female energy system”:
Eventually, he quotes, “Commentary made by Richard” because, apparently, one first name with no citation is authoritative. Well, the mysterious Richard merely asserted, “We are all angels (immortal, invisible spirit beings)…” so that is enough to rely upon.
In concluding that section, he notes, “Our whole existence here is a lie” which is more Gnosticism.
Now, keep in mind that such as been the revelation, “given by the Lord God to his servant Jonathan Kleck, Who has been chosen (predestined)” so that the question is which Lord God? That is because we got a cacophonous mixture of Gnosticism, Kabbalism, mere assertions, mere assertions followed by texts which supposedly allegedly provided support but did not, taking texts out of context to make pretexts for prooftexts, and on it went.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby.
If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help out.
Here is my donate/paypal page.
You can comment here and/or on my Twitter/X page, on my Facebook page, or any of my other social network sites all which are available here.
Leave a Reply