Dr. Justin G. Prock is described on his site as: English professor and the English Chaplain at Pyeongtaek University, in South Korea. Bachelor’s in History from Tennessee Technological University (1990); an 140 Certificate in English as a Second Language from International TEFL Teacher Training (2011); a Master’s in Biblical Studies (2016), a Ph.D. in Biblical Studies/Eschatology (2017), and a Master’s of Divinity (2020), from Louisiana Baptist University; a Certificate of Achievement from The National Bible College (2018); a Certificate in Christian Education from The American Institute of Theology; and four Certificates of Mastery from The Bible Mastery Boot Camp (2021), and ordained as a Reverend in The General Assembly of Presbyterian Church in Korea Pierson.
He posted a video teaching titled BIBLE SERIES – WHO’S WHO IN THE BIBLE – PT 3 the transcript for which is on his site as WHO’S WHO IN THE BIBLE: PART III: THE FALLEN ANGELS, WATCHERS, NEPHILIM, GIANTS, AND DEMONS.
One thing to instantly note is that his reference to, “NEPHILIM, GIANTS” alerts us to keep an eye out for sussing out to what, or whom, he is referring by the usage of the vague, generic, subjective, multi-usage and modern English word giants: what is the usage of that term in English Bibles vs. his usage, do those usages agree or differ.
Up front, he notes:
With regard to His Return, YAHSHUA, Jesus the Christ, stated in Matthew Chapter 24, Verse 37, “For as the Days of Noe were, so also will This Coming of the Son of Man be.”
What was YAHSHUA referring to exactly? What was happening on the Earth in the Days of Noah? What Event brought about Father YAHWEH’s judgment of His Creation by the Flood in Genesis Chapters 6 through 8? (emphasis, including colors, in all quotes of Dr. Prock herein are by him).
Well, there is no reason to wonder what He was referring, exactly, since He told us—in most detail in Luke 17. His words, His emphasis, His points, His context, were:
Just as it was in the days of Noah, so will it be in the days of the Son of Man. They were eating and drinking and marrying and being given in marriage, until the day when Noah entered the ark, and the flood came and destroyed them all.
But He kept speaking directly with:
Likewise, just as it was in the days of Lot—they were eating and drinking, buying and selling, planting and building, but on the day when Lot went out from Sodom, fire and sulfur rained from heaven and destroyed them all—so will it be on the day when the Son of Man is revealed.
Thus, this was about examples of being unaware/unconcerned about coming judgment.
Keeping in mind that this is part 3 of a series, he intros it by noting:
…we are going to talk about the Second Incursion of Satanic Seedline into Father YAHWEH’s Creation in order to corrupt the Adamic Race, as well as His Creation, as found in Genesis Chapter 6, only this time with Fallen and Watcher Angels, who produced the Nephilim, Giants, and their disembodied spirits, which Father YAHWEH in the Book of Enoch, called Evil Spirits/Demons.
He means a, “Second Incursion” after the Gen 6 affair: the original, traditional, and majority view among the earliest Jewish and Christians commentators, starting in BC days, was the Angel view as I proved in my book, On the Genesis 6 Affair’s Sons of God: Angels or Not?: A Survey of Early Jewish and Christian Commentaries Including Notes on Giants and the Nephilim.
Note the reference to, “Nephilim, Giants” and that it is followed by, “their disembodied spirits…Evil Spirits/Demons.” It is difficult, at this early juncture, to discern if he is distinguishing Nephilim from Giants or correlating them.
In any case, note that he also asserted, “Father YAHWEH” must have inspired the Book of Enoch by which I discern he is referred to 1 Enoch, in particular, but that is Bible contradicting folklore from centuries, if not millennia, after the Torah, see my book, In Consideration of the Book(s) of Enoch. As for the specific claim: that demons are the spirits of dead Nephilim (and/or Giants)is just folklore from those centuries, if not millennia, after the Torah. For a biblical view, please see my article, Demons Ex Machina: What are Demons?
He seeks support by noting, “Psalm Chapter 96, Verse 5 clearly states that, ‘All of the gods of the nations are demons;’ That word, ‘gods,’ in the Hebrew is Strong’s #H433, Elohim, which means, ‘angels, magistrates, judges, gods.’” Interestingly, that is a styled admission that Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance offers no support for gods/elohim/demons having anything to do with Nephilim (and/or Giants) and the Psalm also implied no such thing.
He next comments, “what our Bibles have to say with regard to the Antediluvian (Pre-Flood) Prophet Enoch, and why his Book should be included in the Canon of Scripture.” Yet, those are three issues:
1) The actual, “Antediluvian (Pre-Flood) Prophet Enoch.”
2) One of the books titled with his name (or, namesake).
3) And why that one book (one of the books of Enoch asserts that he wrote over 300 books), “should be included in the Canon of Scripture.”
As for 1), Dr. Prock quotes:
Genesis Chapter 5, Verses 21 through 24 which states: “And Enoch lived one hundred and sixty-five years and begot Mathousala. And Enoch continued to please God after he begot Mathousala two hundred years and begot sons and daughters. And all the days of Enoch were three hundred and sixty-five years. And Enoch continued to please God and was not found, for God TRANSLATED him.”
Why did Father YAHWEH translate Enoch? Because he was a very Godly man in the Antediluvian Period of the Bible, and Father YAHWEH needed him as we will see.
Now, please turn in your Bibles to Second Peter, Chapter 2, Verses 4 and 5, which states:
“For if God spared not angels who sinned, but confining them in TARTARUS, in chains of darkness, delivered them up to be kept for judgment – and if He spared not the old world, but preserved eight persons, including Noah, the proclaimer of righteousness, when He brought a deluge on the world of ungodly men…”
He then quotes:
Jude Verses 14b through 15 which states:
“Now to such as these Enoch, the seventh from Adam, prophesied, saying, ‘Behold the Lord is coming with His Holy Myriads (Angels) to execute judgment on ALL and to convict ALL the wicked among them of ALL their impious deeds, which they have impiously committed, and of ALL the bitter things which impious sinners have uttered against Him.’”
Because of these Watcher Angels, who left their Heavenly Abode to corrupt Father YAHWEH’s Creation, sin entered the world on a grand scale, and Father YAHWEH had to deal with it immediately!
As you can see, both Peter and Jude directly quoted from the Book of Enoch.
Now, please turn in your Bibles to Genesis Chapter 6, Verses 1 through 4 which states:
“AND it came to pass when the men (Adamites) began to be multiplied on the Earth and daughters were born to them, that the sons of God (Angels) seeing the daughters of men that they were fair, took to themselves wives of all whom they chose: then The LORD GOD said, ‘My Breath must not continue in these men to this age, because they are flesh; their days, however, shall be an hundred and twenty years.’ Now there were GIANTS on the Earth in those days, after the sons of God went in unto the daughters of men, and they bore offspring to them. These were the giants of old, the men of renown.”
So, the angels of Father YAHWEH, left their first estate (Heaven) and came down to Earth, and procreated with Adamic women, thus bringing forth hybrid children of Heaven and Earth known as the Nephilim Giants.
Continuing with Genesis Chapter 6, Verses 5 through 12 which states:
“So, when the LORD GOD saw that the wickedness of the men on the Earth was multiplied, and that everyone was in his heart studiously and continually bent upon evils, God was grieved that He had made man on the Earth. And God came to a determination and said, ‘I will blot out from the face of THIS EARTH the man I have made, both man and beast; both reptiles and birds of the air. For I am grieved that I made them.’ But Noe found favor in the sight of The LORD.”
“Now these are the generations of Noe. Noe was a just man; and being perfect in the tenor of his life, Noe please God. And Noe had three sons, Sem, Cham, Japheth. Now the Earth was corrupt before God; and the Earth was filled with iniquity. And God beheld the Earth and it was corrupt; because ALL FLESH had corrupted their way on the Earth.”
As an FYI: he is employing that Second Temple Era (516 BC-70 AD) term Watchers (a mere a.k.a. for Malakim/Angels) for an event that was recorded centuries, or millennia, earlier, and took place even more millennia before that, due to his reliance on 1 Enoch.
It is not clear that Peter quoted that text, but Jude seems to have quoted its paraphrase of Deut 33:2, “The LORD came from Sinai and dawned from Seir upon us; he shone forth from Mount Paran; he came from the ten thousands of holy ones, with flaming fire at his right hand.”
In any case, we may point out that Paul quoted Greek poets so, what of it?
We seem to have gotten the answer to Dr. Prock’s usage of Giants (or, one of them) since this time, he compounded, “Nephilim Giants” as referring to the same beings. Well, biblically contextually, “Nephilim Giants” means, “Nephilim Nephilim” so that is circularly redundant. Yet, his usage is still unclear since is he merely nothing that Giants renders Nephilim or that Nephilim were Giants? If the former then we will have to suss out if he employs that usage consistently, if the latter then that only and still begs the question as to English Bibles’ usage vs. his usage of Giants.
He continues thusly, “So, according to Father YAHWEH, ALL FLESH HAD CORRUPTED THEIR WAY ON THE EARTH.”
This time around, he asserts that, “Apocryphal Book of Enoch, which is not in our Bibles…was quoted by Moses, the author of the Pentateuch, and Peter and Jude” and notes, “200 Watcher Angels, led by Semyaz, came down from Heaven onto Mount Hermon” pause: the very specificnumber, the very specific location, and the name Semyaz are Enochian innovation and linguistically contextually, “Watcher Angels” means, “Angels Angels”—see my book Bible Encyclopedias and Dictionaries on Angels, Demons, Nephilim, and Giants: From 1851 to 2010.
At this point, he quotes Dr. Michael S. Heiser about whom I will note that he was credentialed and experienced but not infallible, his Nephilology was not biblical, and he tended to create more problems than he solved within that context—see these articles for examples:
Review of Amy Richter and Michael Heiser on four Enochian Watcher related women in Jesus’ genealogy
Rebuttal to Dr. Michael Heiser’s “All I Want for Christmas is Another Flawed Nephilim Rebuttal”
I also included him in my book, The Scholarly Academic Nephilim and Giants: What do Scholarly Academics Say About Nephilim Giants?
He held to that demons are dead Nephilim and, of course, got that from folklore from well, you know when.
The point of quoting Dr. Heiser was to make a claim about Jesus at the foot (or thereabouts) of Mt. Hermon:
Matthew Chapter 16, Verses 13 through 18. Remember what YAHSHUA, Jesus the Christ, stated at the base of Mount Hermon:
“When Jesus was going to Caesarea-Philippi, He asked His Disciples, saying, Who do men say that I, the Son of Man, am? And they said, Some say, John the Baptist; and some, Elias; and some Jeremias, or one of the prophets. He saith to them, And who do ye say that I am? Upon this Peter, in reply, said, Thou art THE CHRIST, the Son of the Living God. And Jesus answering, said to him, Happy art thou, Simon Barjona; for flesh and blood hath not revealed this to thee, but My Father Who is in Heaven. Now I say to thee, Thou art named Peter, and upon this very rock I will build My Church, and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against It.”
Long linguistics story short, “the Greek word translated ‘hell’ (ᾅδης, hadēs)…the Underworld—Hades, the realm of all the dead, not just unbelievers. The Hebrew equivalent to Hades is Sheol— the place ‘under the earth’ where all went after this life ended’…Both the righteous and the unrighteous went to Sheol…”
The bottom line of which is to apply something about the Underworld to that, “According to the Old Testament, Bashan was controlled by two kings—Sihon and Og—who were associated with the ancient giant clans: the Rephaim and the Anakim…The people of Ugarit believed the Rephaim were the spirits of dead warrior-kings.”
This can get very complex very quickly so I will succinctly note that such is a manner whereby to claim that Rephaim (with Anakim being like a clan of that tribe) where some sort of not-really human living dead. That, as we saw from the quote from Dr. Heiser, is applying Pagan mythology to biblical theology. In Ugaritic texts, recently deceased kings and heroes were referred to as kings and heroes but after they had been dead for some time, they were called rpu (which is their version of rapha) and could be summoned from the dead to attend rituals, etc.—for details, see my article Dead Kings and Rephaim The Patrons of the Ugaritic Dynasty.
From that, Dr. Heiser, and thus Dr. Prock, get that, “Mount Hermon was the location where the divine sons of God had descended from Heaven— ultimately corrupting humankind via their offspring with human women (see Gen 6:1–4). These offspring were known as Nephilim, ancestors of the Anakim and the Rephaim (Num 13:30–33). In Israelite theology, the spirits of these giants were demons (1 Enoch 15:1–12).”
What we have at this point is really a mashing together of Pagan mythology, the historical record of the Gen 6 affair (as I term is), an evil report, and folklore which has somehow come to be termed Israelite theology by Dr. Prock without the qualification that it was myopic Israelite theology from centuries, if not millennia, after the Torah.
As for, “Nephilim, ancestors of the Anakim and the Rephaim” that ranges from unsupported (unsupportable) to what I will term an expandio ad absurdum argument from silence.
Nephilim were strictly pre-flood hybrids, Rephaim were strictly post-flood humans, and there is zero correlation between them.
How could it possibly be that Nephilim were the ancestors of the Anakim and the Rephaim when God did not fail, did not miss a loophole, the flood was not much of a waste, etc., etc., etc.?
Note that fallacious Nephilology damages theology proper and, consciously or not, post-flood-Nephilologists always begin by throwing God and His Word under the bus.
Just how did Dr. Prock get Nephilim past the flood, past God? Well, Dr. Prock told us up front: a, “Second Incursion”—which implies that God missed that loophole which made the flood much of a waste so that God failed and for which there is not only literally zero indication but zero reason to invent such an un-biblical theology proper damaging fantasy story.
See, the one and only reason to even imagine (and imagination is that all it is) post-flood Nephilim was pinpointed by Dr. Prock: 1) an evil report and 2) very late-dated folklore—mashed together via a category error that violates the law of identity.
Num 13:33 reads, “there we saw the giants, the sons of Anak, which come of the giants: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight” (as the KJV has it). Now, post-flood Nephilologists would hope that you simply read that one verse, pick it up, run with it, apply it, and turn it into a worldview-hermeneutic which becomes a black hole which pulls other texts into it which makes for taking texts out of context to make pretexts for prooftexts.
Yet, key hermeneutical questions are: who said it, why was it said, was it accurate, what was the reaction to it, does it conflict with other texts, are there textual critical issues, etc.
I actually quoted a non-Septuagint/LXX version on purpose since that is what Dr. Justin G. Prock played off of: the LXX does not mention Anakim in that verse at all.
Au fond, that verse is an, “evil report” by 10 unreliable guys whom God rebuked. They just made up a fear-mongering, scare-tactic, “Don’t go in the woods…” style of tall-tale.
The report consists of five mere assertions that are unsupported by even one single other verse in the whole Bible. They also contradicted Moses, Cabel, Joshua, God, and the rest of the whole Bible. Plus, they created many logical, bio-logical, and theo-logical problems.
I am unsure why Dr. Prock did not elucidate these facts for his audience.
Anakim were named after Anak who was Arba’s son (Josh 15:13) and we have zero reliable indication that they were Nephilim. Also, to merely assert that all Rephaim were related to Nephilim is what I will term an expandio ad absurdum fallacy since it is merely asserting that is one Rephaim clan was (impossibly) related to Nephilim ergo, all Rephaim must have been as well.
For details, see my post Chapter sample: On the Post Flood Nephilim Proposal.
Dr. Justin G. Prock goes on to note:
…Remember what Paul stated in Second Corinthians Chapter 11, Verse 15, “Nor is this to be wondered at; for Satan himself putteth on the appearance of an angel of light: No wonder, then, if his ministers transform themselves to appear like ministers of righteousness. But their end will be according to their works.”
In other words, Satan and his angels will appear as angels of Father YAHWEH, when, in fact, they are the Fallen Angels.
Indeed, this is about appearance as in what Satan (not Angels) pretends to be and he is not an Angel, he is a Cherub (Ezek 28).
He then quotes, “Enoch Chapter 7, Verses 2 through 6” which states: “And the women became pregnant and gave birth to great giants whose heights were three hundred cubits…” which is a non-standard version since that text actually has Nephilim being 3,000 ells tall which is miles tall: great folklore, poor reality.
At this point, he plays off of a very popular pop-post-flood-giants-Nephilology conspiracy, “The Smithsonian collecting and hiding the skeletal remains of these giants from the past, as well as those found today? Do you think that this finding of skeletal remains of giants just might contradict the atheistic narrative of Darwinism? Yes, it absolutely does!”—see the relevant chapter of my book Nephilim and Giants: Believe It or Not!: Ancient and Neo-Theo-Sci-Fi Tall Tales.
That is a great North American evangelical-style assertion to make yet, the only reason he gave us for thinking that Nephilim were subjectively any taller than the parochial average (which is that the average Israelite male who was 5.0-5.3 ft. in those days) is one single sentence from an unreliable evil report by unreliable guys whom God rebuked and very much late-dated folklore.
The dirty little secret is that since we have no reliable physical description of Nephilim then their height is a non-issue—and that alone debunks 99% of un-biblical Nephilology, the modern branch of which is just un-biblical neo-theo sci-fi tall-tales.
Due to assertions in 1 Enoch, Dr. Prock tells us, “Adamic men learned what to wear for war and Adamic women learned how to beautify themselves, as well as the art of witchcraft, sorcery, and astrology” note that biblically Adamic men and women are the only game in town.
After quoting much from 1 Enoch, he concludes, “Father YAHWEH sent His Holy Archangel Asuryal to warn Noah of the impending judgment on the Earth, and commanded His Other Holy Archangels, Raphael, Gabriel, and Michael, to carry out His Righteous Judgment on the Watchers and their offspring, the Nephilim Giants, and to cleanse the Earth.”
Note that, by definition, there is only one Arch-Angel (and that is Michael) and that Asuryal and Raphael are biblically unknown supposed Angels—see my book What Does the Bible Say About Angels? A Styled Angelology.
Most importantly, note that he is implying that even though God, “commanded His Other Holy Archangels, Raphael, Gabriel, and Michael, to carry out His Righteous Judgment on the Watchers and their offspring, the Nephilim Giants, and to cleanse the Earth” all of them failed, all of them missed a loophole, and the flood was much of a waste since they just came right back post-flood—as per Dr. Justin G. Prock implications.
He went on to write:
When you read the Old Testament, you will note that there were other giant clans all throughout the Land of Canaan that the Israelites had to deal with in order to conquer the Promised Land.
These Serpent Seedline Nephilim Giants and their offspring, the Anakims, Aviums, Caphtorims, Emins, Horims, Rephaims, Zamzummins, and Zuzims, mixed their seed with the line of Cain, the Kenites, as well as the tribes of Canaan, known as Canaanites: the Amorites, the Arkites, the Arvadites, the Girgashites, the Hamathites, the Hittites, the Hivites, the Jebusites, the Perizzites, the Sinites, and the Zemarites. These giants were known to be of great stature with six fingers and six toes and had double rows of teeth.
This gives us a lot with which to deal:
1) As per his usage thus far, “other giant clans” would logically and bio-logically mean, “other Nephilim clans” post-flood yet, that causes the problems that have been noted.
2) The usage of the vague, generic, subjective, multi-usage and modern English word giants in English Bibles is that it merely renders (does not even translate) Nephilim in 2 verses or Repha/im in 98% of all others and so never even hints at anything to do with any sort of height whatsoever.
3) “Serpent Seedline Nephilim Giants” is a fantasy category error that mashes together an assertion that there is a physical Serpent Seedline which is said to include Nephilim along with what is either an English a.k.a. for Nephilim or an assertion about subjectively unusual height—see my five-volume book series Cain As Serpent Seed of Satan for a refutation of the serpent seed theory.
4) The various tribes and clans he lists are an example of a hyper-expandio ad absurdum argument from silence: there is literally zero reliable indication that any of them had anything to do with Nephilim and only one unreliable non-LXX version’s sentence worth of indication that one of those clans did.
5) Zamzummim is merely an a.k.a. for Rephaim and Anakim and Emmim(which he did not list) were like clans of that tribe.
6) Rephaim/Zamzummim, Anakim, Emmim as giants as per Dr. Prock’s latter usage: the only thing we are contextually told about them is that they were subjectively, “tall” (Deut 2)—which is just as vague, generic, subjective, and multi-usage as giants and again, meaning taller than 5.0-5.3ft.
7) “were known to be of great stature with six fingers and six toes” known by whom, where, and when? That is only stated about one single Repha (1 Chron 18-21) and that one Repha is not Goliath.
8) “double rows of teeth” known by whom, where, and when? That is just a modern-pop-Nephilology assertion, there is nothing about such teeth in the Bible.
Now, Dr. Justin G. Prock asserts, “Esau married into this serpent seedline. Hence, the line of Esau/Edom is corrupted Serpent Seedline!” which is quite a simple un-biblical tall-tale to dispatch when we consider that part of his supposed support for that is that with which he followed directly, “In First Samuel Chapter 17, David had to deal with the champion of the Philistine army, the giant Goliath, who was over six cubits tall and had six fingers and six toes. The number ‘666’ is always associated with the Serpent Seedline.”
The premise is faulty and so is the conclusion.
1) Biblically contextually, “the giant Goliath” means, “the Repha Goliath” and such is what he was.
2) “over six cubits tall” I am unsure why Dr. Prock did not inform his audience that the Masoretic text has Goliath at just shy of 10 ft. Yet, the earlier LXX and the earlier Dead Sea Scrolls and the earlier Flavius Josephus all have him at just shy of 7 ft. so, that is the preponderance of the earliest data.
3) Yet, even if myopically opting for the taller of the height ranges: that, as we saw, does not correlate him to Nephilim, whose height is unknown.
4) “six fingers and six toes”: no such thing is stated about Goliath.
5) Thus, “The number ‘666’” (however it is that Dr. Prock got that sum from 12 supposed fingers+12 alleged toes) is irrelevant.
As per Dr. Justin G. Prock, Nephilim were serpent seed so that when he asserts, “Seed of the Serpent survived the Flood” he contradicted the Bible five times (Genesis 7:7, 23; Hebrews 11:7; 1 Peter 3:20; and 2 Peter 2:5) since that is how many times we are told who survived it but Nephilim/serpent seed are not on any of those lists.
Worse still, God failed to do be rid of them Himself and even failed when He (supposedly) attempted to have His people, the Israelites, get rid of them since, “and continues to this day through the seed of Esau/Edom, as well as the other tribes of Canaan!”
That is a tragically dangerously misguided thing to assert since he is asserting that some people are not fully human—see chapter, “Nephil Kampf” of my book Nephilim and Giants as per Pop-Researchers: A Comprehensive Consideration of the claims of I.D.E. Thomas, Chuck Missler, Dante Fortson, Derek Gilbert, Brian Godawa, Patrick Heron, Thomas Horn, Ken Johnson, L.A. Marzulli, Josh Peck, CK Quarterman, Steve Quayle, Rob Skiba, Gary Wayne, Jim Wilhelmsen, et al.
For him, that was the, “Second Incursion of Satanic Seedline” which started with, “Satan/Samael and his offspring, Cain” even though Gen 4:1 clearly states, “Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived and bore Cain, saying, ‘I have gotten a man with the help of the Lord.’”
Dr. Prock is very specific, “200 Watcher Angels and their offspring, the Nephilim Giants…everything had corrupted itself upon the Earth, and men only thought evil continually…That is why in Genesis Chapters 6 through 8, Father YAHWEH flooded His Earth in order to purge and purify His Earth of all of its wickedness and abominable sins.”
Thus, the only logical (yet, un-biblical) conclusion is that, “Father YAHWEH flooded His Earth in order to purge and purify” but could not get the job done since He missed a loophole that Dr. Prock managed to figure out.
But it is not just an implication that God missed a generic loophole but a wholesale survival of them as is, since he wrote, “For more information on whether The Flood was worldwide or only local with regard to Father YAHWEH’s Creation, please see Bertrand L. Comparet’s article, Noah’s Flood was Not Worldwide!”
Thus, “Father YAHWEH flooded His Earth in order to purge and purify” but did not flood quite enough. Well, the fact is that the scope of the flood is irrelevant to Nephilology since they either did not make it past the flood because it was global or because they lived in the flooded region: either way, they did not make it past the flood in any way, shape, or form—and, by the way, see my books Noah’s Flood, the Deluge, Global or Local?, Vol I: A Historical Survey of Views from BC to AD and Noah’s Flood, the Deluge, Global or Local?, Vol II: A Historical Survey of Commentaries from the 1500s to the 2000s.
At this point, Dr. Justin G. Prock goes the route of warning against, “modern science!…biological and chemical weapons; chemtrails; fluoride for the water supply; genetically modified, processed and artificial foods and preservatives; pharmaceutical gene altering mRNA hydrogel nanotechnological vaccines and prescription drugs; as well as the crossbreeding and cloning of animal species, which, by the way, all leads us to Artificial Intelligence, CRISPR Gene Editing Biotechnology, and Transhumanism, which is the atheistic belief that man can live eternally without God…,” etc. which are important issues but not within the context of my review, see my books The Golden Golem Goal: From Organism to Transhumanism – On the tangled web of occult mystical alchemy and high tech Transhumanist chemistry and Transhuman Hollywood: From Normative Fiction to Predictive Programming.
Thus, overall, we got a typical pop-post-flood-giants-Nephilology view which is based on vague terminology the usage of which switches without informing the audience, late-dated un-biblical folklore, the employment of fractions of texts that are mashed together via such, and assertions upon assumptions upon theology proper damaging claims.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby.
If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help out.
Here is my donate/paypal page.
You can comment here and/or on my Twitter/X page, on my Facebook page, or any of my other social network sites all which are available here.
Leave a Reply