-
Richard Dawkins vs. Richard Milton – peer review referees
We continue, from part 1, part 2, our consideration of Richard Dawkins’ review of Richard Milton’s book Shattering the Myth of Darwinism (New Statesman August 28, 1992 AD). Now, back to the referees, Dawkins notes, “Acceptance need not, of course, depend on the referees’ endorsing the author’s thesis: a serious dissenting opinion can deserve to…
-
Science
Some of my books, all of which you can find here or here: Social networks: My Amazon author’s page Facebook Twitter YouTube Archive video site Ken Ammi’s Product Reviews My CafePress shop Google + Norm Geisler references TrueFreethinker.com: Apologeticspress.com’s Kyle Butt references TrueFreethinker.com: Read the article about which Gary Habermas, PhD (Distinguished Research Professor &…
-
New Statesman
Some of my books, all of which you can find here or here: Social networks: My Amazon author’s page Facebook Twitter YouTube Archive video site Ken Ammi’s Product Reviews My CafePress shop Google + Norm Geisler references TrueFreethinker.com: Apologeticspress.com’s Kyle Butt references TrueFreethinker.com: Read the article about which Gary Habermas, PhD (Distinguished Research Professor &…
-
God Delusion
Some of my books, all of which you can find here or here: Social networks: My Amazon author’s page Facebook Twitter YouTube Archive video site Ken Ammi’s Product Reviews My CafePress shop Google + Norm Geisler references TrueFreethinker.com: Apologeticspress.com’s Kyle Butt references TrueFreethinker.com: Read the article about which Gary Habermas, PhD (Distinguished Research Professor &…
-
Richard Dawkins’ review of Richard Milton’s Shattering the Myth of Darwinism
To whom does the erudite elucidator of science, Richard Dawkins, refer to as flat-earther, young-earther, perpetual-motion merchant, astrologer, harmless fruitcake, silly, rubbish, unscrupulous, believer in fairies, believer in werewolves, wretched publisher, twaddle, pig-ignorance, disingenuous, stupid and drivel? See below. Under consideration is Richard Dawkins’ review of Richard Milton’s book Shattering the Myth of Darwinism (New…
-
From Zeitgeist to Poltergeist, Part 12 of 13
“…it could only suit us if girls and women there had as many abortions as possible. We are not interested in seeing the non-German population multiply…” -Adolf Hitler The Topics Covered in This Essay Are As Follows: Hitler’s and Nazism’s Darwinism Use, Abuse and Misuse of Darwin Hitler’s and Nazism’s Darwinism From Charles Darwin’s autobiography:…
-
Evolution: a theory about everything or nothing?
We continue, from part 1 and part 2, considering that the soft science of psychology includes heavy doses of evolutionary worldview philosophy interpretations of data and that there appears to be a correlation between stable families and socio-political conservatism and unstable families and socio-political liberalism. We now come to the portion of the study by…
-
Science
University refers to only to a supposed institute of higher learning but to that which such an institute is supposed to promulgate; a whole, aggregate, entire, etc. view of the world. Ask the question, “What is a human being?” for example, of a biologist, a physicist, a theologian, a mathematician, an economist, a politician, an…
-
A stereotypical atheist
Sometimes a stereotype is a stereotype for a reason. An atheist contacted me and turned out to be such a stereotype that it is virtually a caricature of a stereotype wrapped in a talking point. The comment reads thusly: Thanks for the link to the God Delusion! I love this book. It has helped me…
-
Richard Dawkins vs. Richard Milton – young earth & orthodoxy science
We continue, from part 1, our consideration of Richard Dawkins’ review of Richard Milton’s book Shattering the Myth of Darwinism (New Statesman August 28, 1992 AD). Now we appear to be getting somewhere as the king of cynicism himself urges us thusly, “But let’s not be so cynical.” Right ol’ chap, let us get to…