I am posting this as an open letter because I received an email, replied to it, got no reply in turn and then I looked up Cathy Dunson’s contact info, send her an email and got no reply.
I am concluding that someone sent me the original message without her knowing, as in hacked her email or what have you or she wanted to take a pop-shot and run off without actually dealing with issues in a serious manner—which seems like the most likely case since she did not reply when I contacted her within a new and separate email chain (a chain with only one link as it turned out) and not attached with the first one.
I received an email via the contact section of my site which was simply subject titled, “Sick.”
Now, my email system informed me that “This message may not have been sent by…” and Cathy Dunson’s email address.
The message read:
Wow. How foul your site is. And you pay to host it? I co-host for Zen. He is the most humble, kind, intelligent and smart man of God I’ve ever met. You know .. I stopped on your site in confusion some months back. And I was going to donate to you. Then I realized what you were about. Very sad for you. [sic.]
I replied thusly:
Shalom, I pray I find you well.
I appreciate you sharing with me but I am a bit confused. What do you find foul about my site and what does Zen being humble, kind, intelligent and smart have anything to do with it?
When I got no reply, I found her contract info on the site to which she posts and wrote this to her:
Good day Cathy,
I pray I find you well. I wanted to offer a word of caution as I received a very confusing, accusatory and not very nice email from your e-address and yet my email system stated, “This message may not have been sent by: [Cathy Dunson’s email address]” thus, it seems that your email has either been hacked or someone otherwise used it as their own.
Well, sadly, hit and run emails are not exactly uncommon as some people feel an emotion, type out and email, send it and simply ignore attempts to engage.
So if it was not by her then she seems unconcerned about her e-address being used in such a manner and if it was her she seems unconcerned about my desire to engage this issue.
But what is the issue? Well, the message was emotive and generic so I am not certain. It basically states that Zen Garcia is a nice guy and that therefore—well, therefore I know not.
Let us review: My site is said to be “foul” but there is no elucidation as to how or why. Yes, I pay to host it as does anyone who runs their own site.
We learn that she co-hosts for and/or with Zen which is true of the real Cathy at Fallen Angels.
I have no idea about Zen’s personality and thus have no problem believing that he may very well be “humble, kind, intelligent and smart” I will say a thing or two about the “man of God” portion below.
Now, Cathy or pseudo-Cathy visited my site “in confusion” whatever that means (by accident or because she was confused and sought answers to whatever issue) and then comes a sort of monetary hand-slap, she “was going to donate to you” but is no longer going to do so for the generic reason of now having “realized what you were about” without explaining what this even means, what she concludes I am about, etc. and that she is sad for me without explaining why.
Well, I have written a lot about Zen Garcia or rather have written a lot in reply to his claims on the specific issue of the serpent see of Satan theory which claims that Cain was literally the result of Satan having sex with Eve and that Cain’s descendants carry within them literal Satanic genetics.
Zen Garcia and I actually had very extensive interaction on this issue which is more than I can say for Cathy or pseudo-Cathy. I dealt with Zen’s claim and for that reason it is irrelevant whether or not Zen is “humble, kind, intelligent and smart” as he could very well be “humble, kind, intelligent and smart” and still his claims could be erroneous.
Cathy/pseudo-Cathy has taken an intellectual issue and turned it into an emotional one: because I oppose Zen’s views on the serpent seed issue then my site is foul and I am “about” something for which she feels “sad” for me.
I would like to know whether Cathy/pseudo-Cathy has even read one single article that I posted in dealing with Zen’s claims: which you can find here (and can find my replies to various other serpent seed proponents here which you can find here).
Lastly, to the touchy issue of Zen Garcia being a “man of God” I would ask: which “God”? I know that I am under some sort of pop-cultural obligation to state that “that is between Zen and ‘God.’” This is true in an ultimate sense. What I can state for certain that is that on the serpent seed issue his views are unbiblical and he refuses correction by myself and the many others who have pointed out where he is going astray. At times I listen to Zen and cannot tell if he is a Christian or not. At one point he stated that we are here on Earth in order to bring “dharma” which is Hindu, Buddhist, Sikhist and Jainist concept.
At one point, I noted to his that he was very clearly contradicting the Bible’s very clear statements about Adam and Eve when he claimed that pre-fall they were disembodied light beings who did not live on Earth. I sent him a list of quotations and citations from the Bible and he basically asked me if the Bible is all I had to go by: you can read that exchange here Zen Garcia on Adam & Eve as beings of light not from Earth.
Things got so out of touch with Zen that when I wrote to Dr. Joye Jeffries Pugh about some of the things he was claiming she expressed concern and told me she would be in prayer about it. I reached out to her because they had posted a video discussion wherein they agreed with the serpent seed issue and yet, she was concerned about the direction he was going in general.
Zen Garcia and Dr. Joye Jeffries Pugh
This goes to prove something I have suspected and which his words and actions verify. I do not know his personal history but he may very well have begun his research and public speaking and writing career considering the Bible as his authority. However, his words and actions verify that it is not his authority at the present time. I have read many apocryphal texts and so has Zen. However, whenever they contradict the Bible then the Bible has the authority over them. However, Zen’s modus operandi is that whenever they contradict the Bible then the Bible is wrong as they have the authority over the Bible. This can be proven 100% even simply considering the Adam and Eve issue noted above. The Bible is 100% clear on the fact that they were physical and lived on Earth but since Zen wants to assert that they were not then the Bible is ignored and Zen claims that he is right and does so based on apocryphal text.
I would love to see a reply from Cathy/pseudo-Cathy in general and if nothing else on the Adam and Eve issue as that one is very early to follow, is very clear and is one that she can take up with Zen on air or in private.
As always, she can contact me via my “foul” site’s contact page.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help. Here is my donate/paypal page.
Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Facebook page and/or on my Google+ page. You can also use the “Share / Save” button below this post.