In Jehovah Satan? Reviewing the Theosophy article “SATAN: JEHOVAH,” 2 of 4

COVER - What Does the Bible Say About the Devil Satan - A Styled Satanology.jpg

Continuing a review of the Theosophy article THE CHRISTIAN SCHEME—SATAN: JEHOVAH (Theosophy, Vol. 57, No. 7, May, 1969). Theosophy is an occult cult founded by Helena Petrovna Blavatsky in 1875.
When all segments are posted, you will be able to find them here.

We then finally get into the name game when reference is made to:

Continuing a review of the Theosophy article THE CHRISTIAN SCHEME—SATAN: JEHOVAH (Theosophy, Vol. 57, No. 7, May, 1969). Theosophy is an occult cult founded by Helena Petrovna Blavatsky in 1875.
When all segments are posted, you will be able to find them here.

We then finally get into the name game when reference is made to:
“…the mystic and manifold meaning of the name Jehovah in its abstract sense, one independent of the Deity falsely called by that name…Jehovah appearing only in chapter iv., in the first verse of which he is named Cain, and in the last transformed into mankind — male and female, Jah-veh.”
Reference is later made to “Jehovah-Cain” which his as incoherent as that Eve would have (or could have) birthed “Jehovah.”

An endnote informs us:
“…verse 26 of the 4th chap. of Genesis is correctly translated ‘then men began to call themselves Jehovah,’ but less correctly explained, perhaps, as the last word ought to be written Jah (male) Hovah (female), to show that from that time the race of distinctly separate man and woman began.”

That such is the correct translation is about as assured as that Jah refers to and/or means male or that Hovah refers to and/or means female.

Now, this New Age style writings are generally very chaotic we are then told something more about Satan and then more about God’s name, etc., etc., etc.
We are then told:
“The ‘Serpent,’ moreover, is not Satan, but the bright Angel, one of the Elohim clothed in radiance and glory, who, promising the woman that if they ate of the forbidden fruit ‘ye shall not surely die,’ kept his promise, and made man immortal in his incorruptible nature…the bright Angel (Lucifer).”
The serpent is Satan, “the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan” (Revelation 12:9 and 20:2). Yet, Satan is not a “bright Angel” by any other name either, such as Lucifer since the dragon/serpent/Devil/Satan is a Cherub, not an Angel (Ezekiel 28:14).
Now, that the serpent kept his promise that “ye shall not surely die” is a pure form of Satanic deception since Eve did day, and the dying process began on that day.

The article then refers to:
“Cain, being shown identical with Jehovah, on the authority of the correct reading of verse 1 (chapter 4, Genesis), in the original Hebrew text; and the Rabbins teaching that ‘Kin (Cain), the Evil, was the Son of Eve by Samael, the devil who took Adam’s place’; and the Talmud adding that ‘the evil Spirit, and Samael, the angel of Death, are the same,’ it becomes easy to see that Jehovah (mankind, or ‘Jah-hovah’) and Satan (therefore the tempting Serpent) are one and the same in every particular…the Rabbins expressed…‘Cain had been generated by Samael or Satan.’”
Now, appealing to “the Rabbins teaching” is no way to cite a resource. Note that there is no such thing in the Old Testament as a Rabbinate, that came about during the dispersal to Babylon. Also, referring us to “the Talmud” (without even telling us which of the Talmudim) is referring us to a texts that were put into writing centuries after the time of Jesus—so, millennia after Genesis was written.

Having written a five volume set of books debunking the serpent seed theory, I can tell you (and prove) that any concept of Cain being “the Son of Eve by Samael” aka “the angel of Death” aka here “the devil” is historically virtually unknown: it is a theory that is the fringe of a fringe of fringe—see my Cain as Serpent Seed of Satan series.
Now the claim is that “Jehovah” which merely refers to “mankind” is “one and the same in every particular” sense as “Satan.” But wait, if the serpent is not Satan and neither is the one who impregnated Eve (who was Samael aka the devil) then where is Satan in all this, if at all?

Interestingly, the article takes a very stoic Darwinian view in noting, “Evil is a necessity in, and one of the supporters of the manifested universe. It is a necessity for progress and evolution” since on an evolutionary worldview, evil, pain, and suffering are good since, as noted here, they advance evolution—some top-pop-Atheists go as far as asserting that rape plays a beneficial role in evolution, see here.

The article then shift to arguing that the God of the Bible is actually well, whatever term they use at any given time based on character:
“…the god of Moses, and was held as a proud, ambitious, and impure spirit, who had abused his power by usurping the place of the highest God…Jehovah was called by the Gnostics the Creator of, and one with Ophiomorphos, the Serpent, Satan, or EVIL.”
I am not sure what is wrong with being ambitious and am unsure about how/when God is “proud” or “impure” and especially by what standards Theosophist pressure to pass ethical judgments.
Likewise, we are told, “Jehovah…was identified by all the Gnostics with the evil, rather than with the good principle” but upon what premise?

It is noted, “Jehovah has ever been in antiquity only ‘a god among other Gods’ (82nd Psalm)” but that is like saying He is only a king among other kings or lord among other lords. There is a reason why in English we would write it that He is the (uppercase) King of (lowercase) kings and (uppercase) Lord of (lowercase) lords as “there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth, (as there be gods many, and lords many)” (1 Corinthians 8:5) since there are various low-level gods, lords, kings, etc. there is only one true, ultimate, almighty God, the Lord, the King.
In fact, such is what is clear in Psalm 82 wherein “God [Elohim] standeth in the congregation of the mighty” sure, but “he judgeth among the gods [el].” God is not merely among but is above.

Since Theosophists also have elaborate theories about races (even though there is only one, the human race), it is noted:
“The Lord appears to Abraham, and while saying, ‘I am the Almighty God,’ yet adds, ‘I will establish my covenant … to be a God unto thee’ (Abraham), and unto his seed after him (Gen. 17:7) — not unto Aryan Europeans.”
Reference is also made to “The author of ‘New Aspects of Life’” thusly, “when the name Jehovah became ineffable … the designation Adonai, ‘Lord’ was substituted for it, and ‘…. it was owing to this substitution that the ‘Lord’ passed from the Jewish to the Christian ‘World’ as a designation of God.’”

COVER What Does the Bible Say About the Devil Satan - A Styled Satanology.jpg

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help out. Here is my donate/paypal page.

Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Twitter page, on my Facebook page, or any of my other social network sites listed on the left hand menu and/or on the “Share/Save” button below the tags.