We continue, from part 1, considering the Atheist activism upon which some biased pseudo-scientists base their craft.
Crick’s view is “directed panspermia” which is a specific form of panspermia as it asserts purposeful seeding of life. Of course, appealing to Johnny Alien Seed does not answer the question of origins, information, consciousness or anything but merely pushed the question backwards in time: a long, long time ago in a place far, far away.
Francis Crick, has stated, “The god hypothesis is rather discredited.” Yet, his view is merely Atheist supernaturalism as he is appealing to an unobserved, un-evidenced, experimentally irreproducible appeal to a far gone time, an unknown and inaccessible place, etc. Moreover, the aliens are superior than us, created us, perhaps guide us via technological knowledge or by manipulating our DNA, etc.
Consider another side effect of his Atheistic Dawkinian worldview adherence:
Biologists must constantly keep in mind that what they see was not designed, but rather evolved.
[What Mad Pursuit: A Personal View of Scientific Discovery (London: Penguin Books, 1988 – 1990 AD, reprint), p.138]
Since biologists will readily discern design, as Crick himself did, they must constantly brainwash themselves into denying evidence, denying what they actually see, deny the commonsensical, deny logic, philosophy and science in order to adhere to a tall tale.
They are expected to believe in various mythologies which include crypto-zoological creatures such as the un-evidenced common ancestor. Beginning with the belief that for no reason no one made nothing (or an eternal something, an uncaused first cause) into everything for no purpose. That the universe is fine-tuned by accident. That life came into being when lightning struck a swamp (feel free to plump this up with your chosen favored impressive scientific sounding terms) and on it goes:
…evolutionists believe that because the bobcat, cheetah, domestic cat, jaguar, leopard, lion, lynx, ocelot, puma, and tiger are so similar, they all must have evolved from an extinct common ancestor (the missing cat link). They also believe that the missing cat ancestor, and the missing bear ancestor, and the missing dog ancestor all evolved from a missing carnivore ancestor. The missing carnivore ancestor and the missing rodent ancestor, and the missing ancestors of the other 16 orders, all evolved from a missing mammal ancestor. The missing mammal ancestor, the missing fish ancestor, the missing amphibian ancestor, the missing bird ancestor, and the missing reptile ancestor, all evolved from the missing vertebrate ancestor. (Or, perhaps, the missing bird ancestor evolved from a reptile ancestor.) And all these missing vertebrate ancestors either evolved from an unknown invertebrate, or evolved from the missing common ancestor of vertebrates and invertebrates.
[Do-While Jones, “Death and Taxonomy,” Science Against Evolution]