Hereinafter are some comments on Dr. Scott McQuat’s article “The Fowler’s Snare: Exposing The Plot To Stop The Rapture” which are of most interest to me which are about Nephilim and “giants”: but we first need some setup.
He tells us, “The Bible tells us that the Rapture is an actual escape from judgment…We are told this in Luke 21:32 where it says: Watch ye therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of man.”
Now, what Scott McQuat does is to weave a theory mostly from linguistics and it is very difficult to track. For example, he writes that the “theme of deliverance by the Orbs from calamity, (otherwise known as the Tribulation), simply by rightly dividing the word Escape from Luke 21:32.”
He had previously noted, “In the Greek, the word Escape is Ekpheugo and means To Seek Safety By Flight. If you’ve read any of my other books or articles, you might already be thinking along the lines of flying away via the Orbs or Spheres referred to as Leaves in the parable of the Fig Tree given by Esu” and he has told us of “Jesus, who I will refer to as Esu.”
He also view the ophanim in Ezekiel chaps 1 and 10 thusly, “a Wheel in a Wheel (Orb).”
Now, “Esu told us in Luke 21 above, that in our patience we possess our souls” since the text states, “And ye shall be hated of all men for my name’s sake. But there shall not an hair of your head perish. In your patience possess ye your souls.”
Scott McQuat comments on “This attempted possession on the part of the powers-that-be” but the possession is stated about us and what we do with and to ourselves, the powers-that-be are the one hating us—it seems to me that in the face of hatred, to in your patience possess ye your souls is something like maintain your composure.
Now, the “…powers-that-be” sentence continued directly with:
“makes even more sense when we look at the second logogram which is Shith. This logogram tells us in even more detail what, exactly they are planning to possess but also how they plan to possess it. Sheth literally means Bond, Tie and To Bind. It also happens to mean Weapon. What is the Bond or Tie that they plan to maintain with this Weapon referred to as a Network and a Snare? It is the same Bond or Tie that holds the Temple together, called DNA. And it is within that prison of DNA in which the soul is literally bound; and they want to keep it that way.”
Logogram, or logograph, is a written character that represents a word or morpheme (what gives meaning to a word).
I assume that “Shith” and “Sheth” is a reference to the same thing but he just misspelled one of them. How he can go from a Greek word to its logogram to a weaponized network that has to do with DNA is certainly mysterious: do any of you, my dear readers, still wonder why I employ the term theo-sci-fi so often?
Scott McQuat also wrote, “The Curtain in the Temple is actually one-and-the-same as the Chains in Darkness spoken of in Jude 4 and in genetic terms those chains are called Nucleotides. Just as the Temple Curtain was cut from the Top to the Bottom when Esu died on the cross during the crucifixion.”
Now, Jude tells us of “the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day” so, as per McQuat’s assertion, “the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in” “The Curtain in the Temple” “unto the judgment of the great day,” whatever that means.
Yet, moreover, it means/also means “the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in” “Nucleotides” “unto the judgment of the great day,” whatever that means.
It also seems anachronistic since well, we are not told exactly when those Angels were incarcerated but there is only a one time fall/sin of Angels in the Bible—Genesis 6—which ultimately resulted in the flood so as to be done with the results of the affair and since Angels would not drown to death, it seems logical and theo-logical that God would have incarcerated them then and not until, what?, he took the torn curtain and tied them up, or something, with a nucleotide curtain that hung at the Temple, or something?
He goes on to write:
“…the names of these nucleotides are Cytosine, URacil, Thymine, Adenine and Guanine but in the most ancient writing of Cuneiform ‘G’s are often pronounced as ‘N’s’. The first letters, therefore, of the names of these Nucleotides, when placed together, spell CURTAN.
Even if we were to use the word CURTAG, however, breaking it down into the logograms of CUR and TAG provides the meaning of To Decorate the Doorway or Lintel, which is what the Curtain of Nucleotides do, as they stretch across the Doorway of DNA.
This is just one of many things the Father has helped me discover and is one Microcosmic aspect of the Veil or Curtain that was said to be Pulled Back during the Apocalypse.”
It seems rather convenient that when you have the problem of the actual letter being “G” then you can just punt to the loophole that they “are often”—apparently “often” ergo conveniently in this case for sure—“pronounced as ‘N’” so your theory will work.
It is also convenient to have the linguistic gymnastics result in CURTAN or CURTAG because “the Curtain of Nucleotides” “Decorate the Doorway or Lintel” “the Doorway of DNA,” whatever that means.
Scott McQuat then appeals to Zechariah 1:8 the key portion of which reads:
I saw by night, and behold a man riding upon a red horse, and he stood among the myrtle trees that were in the bottom; and behind him were red horses, speckled, and white. We see from this verse that there is another reference to a Rider on a Red Horse. This time, however, he is specifically said to be among the Myrtle trees.”
He comments, “The word Myrtle is Hadac in Hebrew which simply means Myrtle tree…the original Cuneiform (called The Word in Psalm 119)” I know not of what he speaks at this point since that Psalm contains multiple references to “word” and all are must like vs. 11, “Thy word have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against thee.”
He continues, “a crucial aspect of biblical exegesis that Christian pastors and teachers” are practices such as “When rightly-divided and taken back to the Cuneiform, Hadac becomes the two logograms of HAD and ASA together which are pronounced, Hadassa.”
He then goes from “Hadassa is the Hebrew name of the Queen I mentioned earlier, whose name was Esther” and asserts that “we know that the story of Esther in the Bible is an allegory telling us of the Ester bonds that were woven into the human temple to Marry the two sides of the DNA” referring to “the Ester bonds were woven into the DNA.”
He goes on to claim, “Canon also means Law just as DNA is referred to as a Code, which is simply another name for Law as in when we speak of legal Code.”
“The word Hadac in Hebrew also refers to a Tree that grows up quickly and the word Resheth meaning the Network (Net)…When we put these definitions from the Hebrew and Cuneiform together, we begin seeing a picture emerge of just what this Net is. It is something which:
Emits A Tone
Is Likened To A Tree
Is A Tree That Grows (Goes) Up Quickly
Is A Cage
Is Made Of Metal
Has White On It
Binds or Ties (People) Together
Is A Literal Network
It is quite easy to see that what are referred to as Myrtle Trees in Zechariah are a reference to what we would call a Network of Phone Towers and specifically in our time, a Network of 5G Towers…”
Well, that is about all of the background I can manage to elucidate.
Based on this, and much more like it, Scott McQuat writes:
“We are told that the Myrtle trees were to be Waved at this time and we know that this is a reference to the 5G network that emits Frequency Waves. We also know that a Tide is another form of a Wave.
The word Tidings, therefore (make no mistake), that are said to be a Terror that will come Morning, Day and Night, is simply another way of referring to the Waves of Frequency that the Myrtle Trees will emit, 24 hours a day.
Secondly, we often hear people speak of the return of the Nephilim (Giants) in these End Times and it is clear, according to Isaiah, that the Shot (Overflowing Scourge, Showt [sic.], Vaccine) is the mechanism to make that happen.”
Fascinatingly, it is generally the very same people who claim that God’s purpose for the flood was to be rid of Nephilim who then imply that God failed since, guess what, they came and/or will come back, “the return of the Nephilim (Giants) in these End Times.”
Now, in typical post-flood Nephilim theorizing form, Scott McQuat employs but does not bother defining the vague, generic, and subjective English term “Giants” yet, he writes in terms of “Nephilim (Giants)” so I will take it that he is asserting that Giants is an aka for Nephilim—which is sometimes the case as per some English versions but that causes a lot of problems.
He goes on to write, “I’ve spoken many times of the story of David and Goliath and how it is an allegory showing how, by throwing a very specific type of Stone, David felled the giant, Goliath.” Now, since by giants he means Nephilim then he is simply mistaken to appeal to Goliath, as a “giant,” since he was a Repha, not a Nephil—nor could he have been since he lived post-flood.
He claims, “What this allegory is actually telling us, is that it was by the use of a Stone of Fire called a Pyran in genetic terms, which is a reference to a piece of genetic material called a Phosphate molecule, that Gigantism was assimilated away within human DNA.”
There are so many problems with these assertions.
Firstly, there is no reference to “a Stone of Fire” but only to five river rocks that David picked up.
Secondly, we have no reliable physical description of Nephilim so cannot claim that they suffered from gigantism.
Thirdly, there is a discrepancy about the Repha Goliath’s height—with much more weight on one side—with the Septuagint/LXX, the Dead Sea Scrolls, and Flavius Josephus having him at just shy of 7 ft. and the much later Masoretic text having him at just shy of 10 ft.
Scott McQuat claims that “gigantism is eliminated or at least minimized temporarily within the human condition. This is because the Phosphate molecule (Fire of Molec(ule), Stone of Fire or Pyran, from the Greek and Latin Pyre, meaning Fire) is in place. When that stone is thrown at the adulteress or whore of Babylon, by Esu (who can throw it because He has no Sin…) the veil of DNA (veil of the temple) will be ripped” (ellipses in original).
My concern is not solely that this is nonsensical but that it makes sense to him.
He then asserts, “The Tribulation includes these Nephilim or giants that will arise once that Stone is removed. This is why Isaiah warns that by mocking the Father’s warning about this Overflowing Scourge (Shot, Vaccine), one’s Bonds would be made strong – but only temporarily before the Network fails.”
Right on schedule, he appeals to how “According to ancient texts such as the Book of Enoch, the Book of Jubilees, the Book of the Watchers and others, giants were indeed real. Not only were they real, they became cannibalistic and had an insatiable appetite for blood. This would perfectly fit the scenario we’ve seen from Micah 7:2 which tells us once the Net(work) fails to keep the Good Man from vanishing, there is no one Upright (straight, lawful, just, pleasing, righteous) left on the earth.”
Micah 7:2 reads, “The good man is perished out of the earth: and there is none upright among men: they all lie in wait for blood; they hunt every man his brother with a net.” Of course, this was all about “Hear ye, O mountains, the LORD’S controversy, and ye strong foundations of the earth: for the LORD hath a controversy with his people, and he will plead with Israel” (Micah 6:2) but why not stretch it to the eschaton/end times/last days if it puffs up the theory?
Thus, Scott McQuat claims, “The evidence from the Word tells us with certainty, therefore, that there will be giants roaming the earth with an insatiable appetite for blood during the Tribulation and to satisfy that craving, they will literally be eating people who are left.”
Yet, he cannot actually quote any actual prophecy—certainly nothing form Revelation—to this affect.
Well, I am unsure what I learned about the eschaton/end times/last days from his claims but I did have it confirmed, again, the results of a chaotic concoction modus operadi of isolated/un-contextual words, root words, or logogram, in whatever language is convenient and based on which definition one cherry-picks.
See my books on Nephilim related issues.
A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help out. Here is my donate/paypal page.