tft-short-4578168
Ken Ammi’s True Free Thinker:
BooksYouTube or OdyseeTwitterFacebookSearch

Did the Watcher fallen angels genetically manipulate humans & animals? 2 of 2

We conclude, from part 1, considering various and sundry claims regarding the question posed by the title of this article.

The page They Live Among Us made so many fallacious claims that I decided to pose this part 2 to deal with it.

It begins by quoting Enoch 7 and makes the good point:

It is generally believed that the termed “sinned against” means that the Nephilim mixed their seed with other creatures. Hard to imagine it was done with conventional sexual mounting methods since fish were involved, so this is a clear indication that test tube methods were invoked.

Sadly, this devolves into statement such as that “Many Nephilim were human in appearance” when there is no indication that any of them did not look human even if they were bigger than the average person.

In seeking to justify a favored speculation, some go as far as contradicting the Bible for example, “Some argue that these creatures were all destroyed at the time of the flood, yet there are oral and written records of different tribes of people that hid in the bowels of the earth to protect themselves from the coming flood.” So, the written word of God tells us that the flood brought about “The end of all flesh…to destroy all flesh…every thing that is in the earth shall die…all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man…All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died…And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and the creeping things, and the fowl of the heaven; and they were destroyed from the earth: and Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in the ark” (see Genesis 6-7) Yet, we are made to believe we should discount this due to some unnamed, undated, unquoted and uncited records which claim otherwise.

However, never mind since it is also stated that “It is a moot point if they survived, since Gen 6. clearly states, that after the flood there was a second outfall of angels that came to the earth to mate with human women creating more Nephilim.” We at least have a citation but no quotation which is simply a very unclear, “There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown” (6:4). I say unclear only in as much as that it is being assumed that “those days” must mean pre-flood and thus, “also after that” must mean post-flood. The rest of the entire Bible never mentions any such post-flood event which is good reason to not take “also after that” to refer to post-flood.

Genesis 6 begins by giving us a general timeline as “it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, That the sons of God saw the daughters of men…” Thus, it is contextual to consider the “in those days” to be “when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them” and the “also after that” a simple reference to thereafter. Since Genesis then tells us about the destruction of any and all flesh with the exception of Noah’s family then we can contextually conclude that “also after that” was a pre-flood time.

We are then told that “These new offspring undoubtedly went off to mix their seed with other creatures in the earth that began to multiply and replenish the earth” which is the main reason for dealing with these claims here as they reference mixing with other creatures.

Next we are told, “As the Nephilim began to replenish their soulless seed on the earth, God had instructed Israel to slaughter every Nephilim…The problem was that in time, Israel began to mate with the Nephilim tribes and the Holy Seed was lost.” For this, we are given a quotation and citation, “For they have taken some of their daughters as wives for themselves and their sons, so that the holy seed is mixed with the peoples of those lands. Indeed, the hand of the leaders and rulers has been foremost in this trespass. ‘So when I heard this thing, I tore my garment and my robe, and plucked out some of the hair of my head and beard, and sat down astonished.’ Ezra 9:2-3” As we have seen, the Nephilim did not “replenish their soulless seed on the earth” and generic references to people being “tall” or “very tall” simply is not nearly enough to tie them to the Nephilim, consider them to have been hybrids, etc. Notice how in seeking to puff up a favored theory the result is that we are told that “the Holy Seed was lost” which the Bible not only never states but would mean that Jesus was not of the seed of Abraham which He had to be in order to qualify as Messiah.

No, Israel did not begin to mate with the Nephilim tribes but began to mate with non-Israelites, non-Hebrews, non-Jews which is the only thing that Ezra 9:2-3 is telling us, “the holy seed is mixed with the peoples of those lands” and no indication that this somehow means that “the Holy Seed was lost.” As for the Nephilim in particular, the only other time in the entire Bible where the term even appears is when Caleb and others are sent out to spy out the land. They return and offer a discouraging report, Caleb then offers an encouraging report and the rest of the spies take it up a notch and claim to have seen descendants of the Nephilim within a report which the Bible refers to as “bad” and/or “evil,” see Did Caleb and the spies see Nephilim giants in the land?

In keeping with the manner whereby one fallacy leads to folly leads to well, we are then told that werewolves, vampires and reptilians denoted, “three species of non-humans exist all around us.” The logic runs thusly, vampires, “were created when Nephilim fused their DNA with vampire bats.” “Reptilians are non-humans that can shapeshift” so your friendly neighbor could be a hybrid behind closed doors as we are told, “The Nephilim of today look like the people next door” which is really convenient (for the Nephilim and those claiming that Nephilim are still around without evidence). Yet, we are directed to view “Shapeshifters Caught on Film” with examples being as follows which are from an actual and serious website.

Let’s play you might be a shape shifting reptilian:

If, as in the case of Bill Clinton and George Bush, you clench your jaw then you might be a shape shifting reptilian.

shape2bshifting2breptilian2b1-7839479

shape2bshifting2breptilian2b5-6712154

If, as in the case of Bill Clinton, you raise your eyebrows then you might be a shape shifting reptilian.

shape2bshifting2breptilian2b6-2546745

If, as in the case of the Pope John Paul II, you are massaging your temples or repositioning your head covering then you might be a shape shifting reptilian.

shape2bshifting2breptilian2b2-9266939

If, as in the case of a news reporter, you are on camera and there is a slight glitch in the signal then you might be a shape shifting reptilian.

shape2bshifting2breptilian2b7-1052983

If, as in the case of Beyonce, your facelift is showing or the goop you used on your hair wrinkled up just under your hair then you might be a shape shifting reptilian.

shape2bshifting2breptilian2b4-5474351

If, as in the case of Donald Rumsfeld, someone enlarges a photo enough so that the pixilation is distorted then you might be a shape shifting reptilian.

shape2bshifting2breptilian2b3-2959524

They end up referring to gigantism and note that it “is an excessive secretion of growth hormone” from an overactive pituitary gland. Yet, they merely assert that “once in a while recessive genes switch on and the person becomes a full blown Nephilim. This is called Gigantism.” They also merely assert that psychopathy is the result of Nephilism. In other words, they just take any characteristic they view as negative and claim that it is due to Nephilim genetics namely.

They basically leave off with the claim that “They are the bad seeds planted among us, Matt. 13,” which is utter folly as the Matthew 13 issue is sinful actions and not Nephilim genetics, see Did Jesus teach the serpent seed of Satan theory in the parable of the sower?.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help. Here is my donate/paypal page.

Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Facebook page and/or on my Google+ page. You can also use the “Share / Save” button below this post.


Posted

in

by

Tags: