We continue and conclude, from part 1, considering Clifton A. Emahiser’s two part article titled, “Two Seedline Taught In Dead Sea Scrolls” in which he never got around to evidencing just where the “Two Seedline” is “Taught In Dead Sea Scrolls”; at least not according to his serpent seed of Satan premise that Cain is literally the son of Satan with whom Eve had sex. Additionally, I previously posted Clifton A. Emahiser’s serpent seed of Satan theory.
What he was after is clear from his statement:
When new evidence was brought forth from the Aramiac Targums confirming an omission in Genesis 4:1…When the Targum evidence is added to Genesis 4:1 in italics it would read thusly:
“And Adam knew his wife Eve, who was pregnant by Sammael [Satan], and she conceived and bare Cain, and he was like the heavenly beings, and not like earthly beings, and she said, I have gotten a man from the angel of the Lord.”
The claim that the Aramiac Targums provide “new evidence” is certainly rather odd. But, pray tell, why not claim that when new evidence was brought forth from the Hebrew Bible it confirmed additions in Genesis 4:1 of the Targum?
Clifton A. Emahiser is referring to The Targum of Palestine, Commonly Entitled the Targum of Jonathan Ben Uzziel, on the Book of Genesis aka Targum Pseudo-Jonathan which dates to the sixth century AD (that is right AD, not BC) which dates it to 1,500 to 2,000 years after the Book of Genesis was written (depending on when one dates Genesis). Emahiser had to appeal to something so be quoted the Targum while supposedly telling us about the Dead Sea Scrolls. Well, Genesis 4:1 was not found amongst the Dead Sea Scrolls and so he grasped at straws.
I dealt with the issue of Genesis 4 in the Targum in the article Zen Garcia on the Hebrew Torah, Aramaic Targum and English KJV and followed up with Zen Garcia on Eve’s desire for the Angel of the LORD.
Lastly, let us consider Emahiser’s reference to what he considers to be wayward (to say the least) Identity preachers. Identity referring to Aryan Whites being the true “Jews,” see my relevant articles here.
Clifton A. Emahiser wrote:
Sadly, many in the Identity Message today do just that, on a variety of subjects, especially the antichrist, anti-seedliners and those preaching universalism (that is, to attempt to bring the other races, termed “heathen” in the Bible, via the backdoor of the Kingdom under our Covenant).
Of course, he is writing from a racist perspective but the whole point of the whole Bible is to bring “heathen” into the Kingdom of God.
He continues thusly:
To all the apologists for the other races, I say this: It is high time to either get fully into Israel Identity or get entirely out. Should you decide on the latter, I suggest you return to the Jew-deo-unchristian churches, from where you came, to preach your anti-seedline and universalist doctrines. Astonishingly, there are so-called Identity “teachers” who erroneously call themselves “pastors” who are advocating that even the impostor “Jews” can be saved if only they will accept “Jesus Christ” as their personal Savior.
In Detroit, at a small Identity church, they have a “Jew” in the congregation. There could be nothing more out-of-place than a black, Mongolian or “Jew” at an Israel Identity meeting…Ted R. Weiland is one of them. I am fully persuaded that when Weiland stands before the Almighty in judgment, Yahshua will ask him, “Why did you give aid and comfort to My enemies?”
Well, yes, the whole point of the whole gospel is that “Jews” and Gentiles alike, “can be saved if only they will accept ‘Jesus Christ’ as their personal Savior.” Apparently, Ted R. Weiland’s sin, was to refer to a “Jews” who would “join himself to Yahweh” and asked, “why wouldn’t we want” that and “Why wouldn’t we want the nations around to be serving our God?…why wouldn’t we want to embrace others into this message?” Well, because that would rob personages such as Emahiser of their self-justifying racism.
Apparently referring to the fact that Romans were “white,” Weiland stated, “it wasn’t the Jews of today who crucified our Lord and Savior — it was us.” Of course, he may simply be referring to humanity in general.
Emahiser followed up with:
Then Weiland had the guts to ask Yahweh to bless his message! What ever happened to the passage, “Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith Yahweh, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you …”, 2 Corinthians 6:17. The other races are “unclean” to us, and Yahweh commands total “separation.”
Well, Emahiser needs to read the text for context so as to not make a pretext for a prooftext. He misinterprets the “them” in “come out from among them” to be the “Jews.”
The text states:
Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.
Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, and will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.
Note that the dichotomy is not false “Jews” vs. Aryan White true “Jews” but rather: Righteousness vs. unrighteousness. Light vs. darkness. Christ vs. Belial. Believeth vs. infidel. The temple of God vs. idols.
Therefore, be separate from “the unclean thing”: unrighteousness, darkness, Belial, infidel and idols.
As to the claim that “The other races are ‘unclean’ to us, and Yahweh commands total ‘separation’”: Biblically there is only one race and that is the human race. “The other races” may be “unclean” to “us” meaning racists such as Clifton A. Emahiser but what saith the Bible? After all, note that Emahiser stated the following of Weiland’s statements, “He surely doesn’t get it from Scripture, and noticeably he didn’t quote chapter and verse. Therefore, it’s not Christianity; it’s Weiland-ism!” Well, let us quote chapter and verse.
Acts 17:26-27
And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; that they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us.
Galatians 3:28-29
There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.
Revelation 5:9-10
And they sung a new song, saying, Thou art worthy to take the book, and to open the seals thereof: for thou wast slain, and hast redeemed us to God by thy blood out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation; And hast made us unto our God kings and priests: and we shall reign on the earth.
Revelation 7:9-10
After this I beheld, and, lo, a great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations, and kindreds, and people, and tongues, stood before the throne, and before the Lamb, clothed with white robes, and palms in their hands; And cried with a loud voice, saying, Salvation to our God which sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb.
One last question by Emahiser, “Where in the Bible are we commissioned to take our Law to the non-Israelites?” Two questions for Emahiser: 1) what is “our Law” and 2) who are the “non-Israelites”? Let us assume that the answer to 1) is the gospel and 2) is anyone who is not an Aryan White.
Well, the New Testament contains commissions to take the gospel to Jews and Gentile: all people so this is more evidence that no matter how he defines and redefines terms Emahiser is simply wrong.
Matthew 15:24, “But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”
Galatians 2:7, “But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter.”
Mark 16:15, “And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.”
So, there you have it, the gospel is preached to “the lost sheep of the house of Israel,” “the uncircumcision,” “the circumcision” and “every creature.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help out. Here is my donate/paypal page.
Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Facebook page.
Twitter: #CliftonEmahiser, #Serpentseed, #racism
Facebook: #CliftonEmahiser, #Serpentseed, #racism