If you want to find out where oh where the serepent seed of Satan theory (or, “Two Seedline”) is taught In Dead Sea Scrolls then do not bother reading “Two Seedline Taught In Dead Sea Scrolls” part 1 or part 2 by Clifton A. Emahiser.
It is not recommended because it fails to deliver on its premised to elucidate where the two seedline is taught in dead sea scrolls and is, rather, merely a forum for Emahiser to express his personal prejudices. In fact, at one point, he perceives this and actually wrote, “You are probably wondering what all this has to do with Two Seedline being taught in the Dead Sea Scrolls.”
I already wrote an article titled Clifton A. Emahiser’s serpent seed of Satan theory but, of course, no Dead Sea Scroll material was provided by Emahiser.
In essence, he has a section within the two part article, titled, “DEAD SEA SCROLLS WITNESS TO TWO SEEDLINE” in which he notes that “they refer to themselves as ‘children of light’ and allude to the enemy as ‘the children of darkness.’”
Apparently, any dichotomy is enough to claim two seedlines (or, bloodlines). Indeed, the Bible’s Genesis 3 refers to the woman’s seed being at enmity with the serpent’s seed. Yet, just who the seed are is elucidate by the Bible and via personal interpretation by various serpent seed of Satan theorists.
Within the Bible the seed of the woman are who are following YHVH and the seed of the serpent are those who are following Satan. Emahiser sees folly in “Attempting to spiritualize and take a figurative view of the ‘tares’ in Matthew 13.” It is due to Matthew 13 and for that matter Matthew 23 and John 8 that I affirm that who are the seeds within the Bible (see here for articles on these specific texts).
Yet, serpent seed of Satan theorists place into the camp of the serpent’s seed anyone they do not like. Thus, the enmity between the lines may be between the Calvinistically predestined saved vs. the predestined condemned or between the lines of Cain and Seth or between the those possessing literal Satanic genetics which they inherited from Cain, the literal son of Satan (the result of, or so they claim, Eve having sex with Satan) or, in the case of Clifton A. Emahiser the Jews vs. the true Jews who are Aryan Whites, as he puts it, “Satan deceived Eve into giving up her chastity and conceiving Cain.”
He states that the claim that “the ‘Jews’ are God’s chosen people” is what the Jews “falsely claim.” And he explains that “when the term ‘Jew’ is used, it means the ‘Jewish’ proselytes who were not purely Judah by birth” and notes that in 1917 AD:
…when Palestine became a British Mandate under King George VI, a bona fide descendant of David. 1917 was the year that General Allenby captured Palestine and entered Jerusalem with true Israelite soldiers from Britain, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, and a few minor contingents of non-Israelites such as India, Egypt, Singapore, Hong Kong and the West Indies. [emphasis added for emphasis]
Conversely, he refers to “the Satanic ‘Jews’” and also promulgates:
The watchman’s job is to identify the enemy, and that is what Two Seedline is all about! This is where it gets quite serious, for the antichrist anti-seedliners are maliciously interfering with Yahweh’s watchmen on their appointed rounds.
And more disturbingly:
Our people must start to understand that we are in a RACE WAR…That RACE WAR started in Genesis 3:15 and 4:1…The antichrist, anti-seedliners falsely claim that RACE WAR is a “flesh war”…This RACE WAR is a genocidal war designed to completely destroy an entire race of people, that being the White Anglo-Saxon Race.
Well, I am not antichrist but am an anti-seedliners and yet, I deny that we are in a flesh war because Ephesians 6:12 states that “we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.” Thus, this is neither a race nor a flesh war.
Clifton A. Emahiser states:
I will use the book Understanding The Dead Sea Scrolls, edited by Hershel Shanks. Even though it was edited by a “Jew”, I still recommend this book…Shanks is only the managing editor of several other authors…You, no doubt, already notice several “Jewish” names.
However, he does not focus on the scrolls but upon disputed amongst scholars regarding anti-Semitism vs. being an “anti-Judaist” or being “against Zionism,” etc.
The only Dead Sea Scroll related point is quotations from Frank Moore Cross Jr. in The Ancient Library of Qumran (1961 AD ed.):
Page 77: “Apocalypticism sees world history in the grip of warring forces, God and Satan, the spirits of truth and error, light and darkness. The struggle of God with man, and of man with sin, evil, and death becomes objectified into a cosmic struggle.”
Clearly, God vs. Satan, spirits of truth vs. error, light vs. darkness, God vs. man, man vs. sin, evil and death cannot be the result of a seedline that resulted from Cain’s Satanic genetics.
Cross is also quoted to the effect that (Pages 92-93) “In the section of the Rule of the Community dealing with the doctrine of the Two Spirits (to which the sons of light and darkness are allotted from creation), we find a rigorous predestinarian formulation which teeters on the edge of determinism.” Indeed, this is what can later be called the Calvinistic view.
Again, Cross is quoted (Pages 209-211) surely, to Emahiser’s delight, “The Essene Rule also requires that one ‘hate’ all the ‘children of darkness’, even as he must ‘love all the children of light’” thus, justification for his particular prejudices.
Another quote is much like the one we already considered and references “two warring spirits, created by God from the beginning: the Spirit of Truth and the Spirit of Wickedness or Perversity.” With the Spirit of Wickedness being “Belial,” the Spirit of Truth being “the holy spirit (not identical with the Holy Spirit, though often hard to distinguish)” aka the Prince of Light aka the Angel of Truth.
Something very important to consider is that simply because someone references two seedlines (by any other name) does not mean that they hold to the serpent seed of Satan theory. As aforementioned; there is a Biblical concept of two seed and various unbiblical concepts.
The last quote from Frank Moore Cross Jr. (p. 211) references “two spirits…the spirits of Truth and Deceit (or Wickedness)…(the Spirit of) Truth and…(the Spirit of) Error…the Prince of Light…the Angel of Darkness…the Angel of Darkness.”
Thus, Clifton A. Emahiser never got around to showing where Two Seedline are Taught In Dead Sea Scrolls but only shows where two somewhat vague dichotomies are taught and nowhere where the serpent seed of Satan theory is taught.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help out. Here is my donate/paypal page.
Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Facebook page.
Twitter: #CliftonEmahiser, #Serpentseed, #racism
Facebook: #CliftonEmahiser, #Serpentseed, #racism