tft-short-4578168
Ken Ammi’s True Free Thinker:
BooksYouTube or OdyseeTwitterFacebookSearch

Clifton A. Emahiser Cain’s Satanic genetics seedline-bloodline

clifton20a-20emahiser-6284862

It is simply amazing the various unreasonable, preposterous, nonsensical and twisted arguments that opponents of Two Seedline teaching advance to

secure their groundless, unfounded and insecure positions.

—Clifton A. Emahiser

Herein I continue reviewing Clifton A. Emahiser’s The Great Two Seedline Controversy War in Identity and you can find the series here (emphasis within quotes from Emahiser are his own).

Astonishingly, Clifton A. Emahiser actually refers to Genesis 4:1 and actually writes, “Adam’s knowing Eve had nothing to do with the birth of Cain.” Even stranger is that he wrote, “In most cases, the logical conclusion that Cain was the son of Adam would be a proper one, but not with this verse.” Serpent seedline of Satan theorists cannot allow that verse to state that which it states because, of course, it utterly obliterates their theory, “And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD.”

Well, Emahiser decides to write his own version of it which he does so thusly, “this verse in a new light, but of an old truth: And Adam knew Eve his wife; ———————— and (she next) bare Cain, and said, I have gotten my first (male child), a man to present to Yahweh as first born. And she again bare his (½) brother Abel. (Gen. 12:13) I have changed the words a little to make the meaning eminently more evident and truth worthy.”

I have no idea why he cited “Gen. 12:13” and suppose it is a simple mistake. In any case, he changed the words a little to make the meaning fit into his theory and not in the least bit truth worthy.

I have noticed that serpent seedline of Satan theorists love to play games of gotcha!: the pose question that are meant to get you to think only they can answer and thus that their theory must be true. Clifton A. Emahiser poses one of the theorists’ favorites:

Among other very important details the opponents of Two Seedline doctrine do not explain is: why is Cain left totally out of the genealogy of Adam?…Other genealogies in the Bible go into great detail and never leaves out a son! (especially a firstborn son).

Well, I have already dealt with this above when I mention that Cain absconded from Adam and Eve. He moved away and began his own family. Note that it is tricky to point out that “Other genealogies in the Bible go into great detail and never leaves out a son! (especially a firstborn son)” when it is just as true that other genealogies in the Bible do not go into great detail and do leave out a son or two and a daughter or two. The ultimate point of genealogies is to point us to Jesus and Cain is simply note in that line as other offspring of Adam and Eve were not and some Gentiles were.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help. Here is my donate/paypal page.

Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Facebook page and/or on my Google+ page.

Twitter: #CliftonEmahiser, #Seedlines, #ChristianIdentity
Facebook: #CliftonEmahiser, #Seedlines, #ChristianIdentity


Posted

in

by

Tags: