“all who hate me love death”
—Proverbs 8:36
“I’ve done thousands of abortions… People will say that I am detached,
that I am aloof, that I’ve lost my moral center
”
—Willie Parker
In my first related article Christian abortionist Willie Parker speaks out I noted:
Overall, the media hoopla about Parker is a PR campaign in more than one way. Firstly, he is publishing a book and so such “news” stories are merely free ad times to push his book wherein he makes moral argument for abortion. The media bias is like a punch in the face as there very many books by Christians who make a moral argument against abortion and never get as much as one interview (which would be an utterly hostile one at that. The attraction for the media is also that they can trot out someone who celebrates abortion is also claims to be a Christian. I found it interesting that he wears a ring with an Egyptian religious symbol on it, an aukh, which ironically means long life—and is worn by a man who makes a living by purposefully shortening lives.
Hereinafter, I will consider Amy Yurkanin’s “Christian abortion doctor from Alabama makes ‘A Moral Argument for Choice,”” Alabama Local News, March 22, 2017 AD.
Professor of psychology Paul Vitz noted that, for various reasons, the world’s most well-known Atheists had poor relationships with their dad’s and that, applying Freudian theory, they ultimately rebelled against the ultimate father figure: God.
Willie Parker makes a living by murdering thousands of beautiful, healthy, innocent and defenseless human babies. He notes, “I never had a father-figure in my home” and that “People will say that I am detached, that I am aloof, that I’ve lost my moral center” which would be a 100% accurate observation. He had no father-figure and now ensures that thousands of fathers have not babies for whom to be father-figures.
He states, “I believe that what I do is rooted in justice, is rooted in love, is rooted in honesty and integrity. Those are values that, for me are reinforced by my Christian understanding…my work is rooted in justice and compassion, that there’s nothing for me to be ashamed about.”
Justice? Not for the babies. Love? Not for the babies. Honesty? Well, he admits to murdering thousands—this guy is a straight up sociopathic serial murdered. Integrity? Utter lack thereof, actually. Thus, this may be his subjective Christian understanding (as he refers to “my”) but there is a reason why 2,000 years’ worth of Christians and 5,000 years’ worth of Jews have condemned abortion and it is not because Parker is the most scholarly Bible interpreter of the past five millennia nor the most enlightened ethicist.
He complains “how can we have an honest dialogue when you start the question with ‘You’re not really a Christian.’” Can you tell that he has no reply and so blames the questioner? Why can he not simply say, “the way we have an honest dialogue when you start the question with ‘You’re not really a Christian’ is by having me reply that ‘Of course I am—even though I violate 5,000 years’ worth of biblical understanding—and the media loves me for it now, buy my book.’”
He states, “I…identify as a Christian and I embrace the compassion that I find to be in that tradition. And that compassion leads me to act on behalf of others instead of judging them.” Anyone can “identify as a Christian” but that is not the way it works and Jesus told us we would know His followers by their fruit. So, what are Parker’s fruits? Well, it is literally impossible for him to “embrace the compassion” when he brutally murders innocent people for a living. In fact, Jewish folklore has abortion being introduced to humanity by fallen angles.
He is asked “Why make it a moral argument?” for abortion “Why not a scientific one?”:
I do this work…based on the ethics and the morality of it. The resistance and the effort to impede women is made on the basis of morality. So, the goal was to mount a counter-narrative to say that, in the context of the opposition that is framed as conscientious refusal, conscience is personal. And it’s often derived from religious understanding.
But what of the resistance and the effort to impede babies? Note that he simply ignored the scientific issue.
He is asked about having said that “the pro-abortion side hasn’t been very good at making a moral argument.” He replied, “They’ve not been effective because they’ve not made the effort.” Well, that may be accurate in large part since one cannot do so and because poop-culture argues that a woman can do whatever she wants which is why the issue of abortion is always sidetracked into being a women’s rights issue—which is it not and what about babies’ rights?
Willie Parker notes that his detractors “act as if the 11th commandment was ‘Thou shalt not have an abortion.’” Well, we do not need an 11th since if he merely reads a few lined prior, he will find the one he is violating which is against murder.
He states, “there’s been this notion that you cannot question this issue because we assert and allege with a very loud voice that morality is the domain of religion.” But clearly, morality is not the domain of religion because now an abortionists claims to be qualified to lecture us about the morality of the manner in which he makes a living: tantamount to a thief arguing in favor or theft. Also, he is contradicting himself in claiming that “we assert and allege with a very loud voice that morality is the domain of religion” even whilst asserting and alleging with a very loud voice that abortion is moral based on his (mis)understanding of religion.
He notes:
We declare abortion immoral. And therefore we put abortion in the domain of religion and we can demonize it and we can take select passages of sacred text and manipulate them to our liking and dare anyone to question them. And I simply beg to differ.
Well, I simply beg to differ on various levels such as that we do not simply “declare” abortion immoral but come to that conclusion via various routes. Also, we do not solely put abortion in the domain of religion but also ethics and science. And you can see that he knows that abortion goes against the Bible because he generically dismissed select passages which are troublesome to him and claims that they are being manipulated in a generic manner.
He is asked about his views regarding “OB/GYNs one day dispensing abortion medications and doing procedures in regular offices” which is an interesting question in more than one way since he began his career bringing babies into the world as an OB/GYN and now takes them out of the world. Well, Parker has very many problems, obviously, and it clearly ethically bankrupt as well as theologically and logically. He stated, “I am as pro-abortion as a cardiothoracic surgeon is pro-heart transplant” but the reality is that cardiothoracic surgeons remove a damaged heart and replace it via a heart transplant. Willie Parker removes healthy babies and is done with it. He then states, “Nobody wants a heart transplant” well, you know, except those who need a heart transplant. He must be implying that no one wants an abortion when there are literally millions upon millions of human corpses which are evidence to the contrary.
He further states that “every cardiothoracic surgeon wants someone with severe heart disease where they need a transplant to have transplant services available. Are you about people having access to the care that they need? That’s my relationship with abortion.” But abortion’s purpose is to take a human life so the question is, “Are you about babies having access to the care that they need?” Parker’s answer, evidence by the way he makes his living, is clearly no, that’s my relationship with abortion.”
Moreover, he notes, “I’ve done thousands of abortions. You know why I do thousands of abortions? A lot of people will do your hysterectomy or your cesarean section. Not a lot will do your abortion” because most take the Hippocratic Oath seriously. Yet, again we see his utter lack of logic: hysterectomies are used to save a woman’s life and cesarean sections are to save the babies but Parker’s every technique is meant to end thousands of human lives.
He then notes asks and answers, “How many abortions will I do for a woman? How many times do you show up pregnant and don’t want to be?” The actual question is why do you show up pregnant and don’t want to be? And no, yelling “RAPE!” is no sort of answer since even if a pro-lifer agrees with abortion in the case of rape we still then have to deal with 99% of the millions upon millions of other abortions.
He states, “I have more precision to my moral center than I’ve ever had. I’m as clear morally about what is my role and my relationship to the ecosystem and my fellow human beings as I’ve ever been.” This only goes to show how someone who commits murder for a living can so completely delude themselves and recall that he had stated, “conscience is personal” well, the Bible refers to people “having their conscience seared with a hot iron” (1 Timothy 4:2).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
See here to order the following in t-shirt, sticker and other formats:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help. Here is my donate/paypal page.
Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Facebook page and/or on my Google+ page. You can also use the “Share / Save” button below this post.