tft-short-4578168
Ken Ammi’s True Free Thinker:
BooksYouTube or OdyseeTwitterFacebookSearch

Cain as serpent seed of Satan with Enterthe5t4rz

Enterthe5t4rz also wrote:

If you reject the serpent seed, you reject the struggle between good and evil and why Jesus had to spill his blood. In order for a person to make a proper judgement on this topic, they need to see the 4 videos I’ve uploaded around this one. The bible is CLEAR. Only one verse challenges the doctrine and I address this seeming contradiction. The punishment fit the crime. Sexual, reproductive sin equals sexual reproductive punishment. CHILD BEARING.
You see, religious programming has hidden the truth from you. And, you wield their weapon of choice. To discredit the source, rather than address the issues raised.

Here is my reply:

Friend, I am saddened to see that you have obviously not read the article I wrote to which I referred you, the one published in a Christian apologetics journal (search online for “Serpent Seed of Satan article in a Christian Apologetics Journal”). If you read it you would see how I back up my statement that the two lines are not based on genetics but on actions. This is what the Bible teaches and this is proof that I do not reject the struggle between good and evil. You would also know that the Bible tell us just how “The punishment fit the crime” and that it was not “Sexual, reproductive sin equals sexual reproductive punishment. CHILD BEARING.” Rather, the Bible shows us that what we are told about Adam and Eve is directly related to their curses: pre fall he was to keep the garden but post fall he had to work the land, pre fall she was to be the mother of all living but post fall she had to experience pain (or increased pain) in childbirth.

I having written 48 articles plus the one published in a journal on the serpent seed theory from various angles and dealing with the views on the issue by proponents on the theory who have been around for much longer than you or I. Thus, you simply cannot tell me that I have sought to “discredit the source, rather than address the issues raised” as I have addressed very many issue raised relating to this subject. Just because I oppose a view that I have researched very, very carefully does not mean that I am a victim of religious programming. That is just a cheap manner whereby to seek to shrug off my statements while ignoring my published research.

Enterthe5t4rz’s reply was:

I know what you are saying ad it is no different than the religious paradigm. I challenge that based on the scriptures

Mine was:

Friend, you only sort of “challenge that based on the scriptures” as you also added lots of picking and choosing out of numerous definitions for any given root word. Also, referring to the shape of snake skins, Saturn, Chronos, etc. is not biblical. If you stick strictly to the text of the Bible you will find that serpent seed theory much more difficult and actually impossible to defend. I do not reject is because I do not like it, I reject it because I looked up every text to which serpent seed theorists point me (and then some) and they simply do not say what I am told they say.

enterthe5t4rz-1663071
Enterthe5t4rz’s claim that God’s throne in our brain (if we turn it upside down and cut off the brainstem)

and that thus, God’s throne looks like a gamer’s bean bag

.

Enterthe5t4rz noted:

It’s actually very easy to prove. The ONLY scripture that seems to contradicts it is Genesis 4:1. And I Have addressed that scripture in another video.

Here is what I stated:

Well friend, it seems to me that, for example, if I invent a theory that the Bible does not teach such as that ancient aliens from Alpha Centauri created life on Earth you I could not then legitimately claim that this is actually very easy to prove. The ONLY scripture that seems to contradict it is Genesis 1:1. And I Have addressed that scripture by pointing out that when the Bible says “God” it really means aliens from Alpha Centauri. It is not up to the Bible to disprove it and not even up to you to use not use the Bible to prove it, as that often leads to reading into text, but to see if that is what the Bible teaches on its own. What you will find is that in every case where we are supposed to conclude serpent seed you will find that the text does not speak of genetics but of actions.

For example, in the relevant parables of Jesus (as you can see from my article) or very specifically 1 John 3 tells us very clearly to not be like “Cain, who was of that wicked one” but how was he “of that wicked one” by genetics? Because that wicked was his dad? No, rather because Cain “slew his brother” and then we are even told why he slew him “And wherefore slew he him?” because he was Satan’s son who carried his satanic genetics? No, “Because HIS OWN WORKS were evil, and his brother’s righteous.” It is about actions and not genetics.

His reply was simply:

Alpha Centauri?

Since I do not know what he is asking for, I replied with:

Alpha Centauri?

In the next segment, we will consider Enterthe5t4rz’s claim that we can draw closer to Yeshua via serpent seedine of Satan theory.

For my entire serpent seed of Satan section see here.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help out. Here is my donate/paypal page.

Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Twitter page, on my Facebook page and/or on my Google+ page.

Twitter: #Enterthe5t4rz, #Serpentseedine, #Bible
Facebook: #Enterthe5t4rz, #Serpentseedine, #Bible


Posted

in

by

Tags: