If there were another legitimate way to interpret the scene in the garden that wasn’t a sex orgy
version, I’d like that very much
—Bob Schlenker
Herein is the continuation of a review of Bob Schlenker’s article Who is Cain’s Father? Part Three having already considered parts 1-2, you can (eventually) find the whole series in toto here. He makes another claim about Ham which is that his actions were motivated by his genetics, “It’s easy to understand how people are who and what they are because of what’s inherited from their parents, genetically.” To some extent this may be the case but keep in mind that his context is that Ham was “grafted into the bad tree” (whatever that means) and so his actions were drive by Satanic genetics. He adds, “It does not seem at all likely that Ham just woke up one day with the idea of procreating with his mother…it seems likely to me that there were also certain genetic factors that were present from birth.”
Of course, at this point I must ask a gotcha question of my own, as I did when dealing with serpent seed of Satan theorist Zen Garcia when he claimed that Cain murdering Abel was genetically inspired. According to the Bible Adam and Eve sinned (and according to Bob Schlenker they had an orgy which included sodomy between Adam and Satan) and yet, when came their genetics? Adam’s genetics came directly as a creation of God and thus, were pristine. God Himself then made Eve from Adam’s genetics, his rib, pre-fall and so her genetics were pristine as well. And yet, thy both sinned. Thus, there is no reason whatsoever—except desperation to support a false theory—to claim that anyone’s genetics caused their sin.
Yet, he asks “Could Ham have mutated somehow?” and answers that “In the biblical narrative…we’re given what must be considered a clue” and his view of the supposed clue speaks volumes of his propensity for weaving tall tales.
He notes that “Some years must pass” after the flood for Noah to begin farming, planting a vineyard, the grapes to grow, etc. and “they began to eat what grew from the ground. Yet, “The flood did nothing to change the status of the cursed ground, or the promise that it would produce for Adam a ‘thorns and thistles’ people!” Thus, he turns a text which is contextually about Adam going from the hobby of gardening to having to work the ground which would produce weeds, essentially to one about people who have Satanic genetics.
Bob Schlenker notes that Ham:
…ate of the cursed ground…produced Canaan…begat Cush, who brought forth Nimrod. It’s in the biblical account of Nimrod where some light appears to be shed on what happened to Ham.
Cush hath begotten Nimrod; he hath begun to be a hero in the land; he hath been a hero in hunting before Jehovah; therefore it is said, `As Nimrod the hero [in] hunting before Jehovah.’
Genesis 10:8-9 (Young’s Literal Translation)As Tom Horn points out, Nimrod didn’t start out life as a hero, a giant, or, “gibborim.” He “began to be,” genetically changing, mutating.
Well, referring to 1) hero, 2) giant and 3) gibborim makes this complex so let us go one by one. 1) Hero: no one is born a hero as being considered heroic requires having taken a heroic action. 2) Giant: this is a relative term. For example, what is a giant to an African Pygmy with males averaging 4.11 ft., to a pro basketball player the tallest of which does not make it to 8 ft., or to a Hebrew of biblical times with males averaging 5.5 ft.? The tallest person specified within the Bible is Goliath and that only as per the 9.8 ft. version with other version having him at 6.7 ft. (Hebrew and Greek texts differ).
3) Gibborim: this refers generically to being mighty and is applied to the Nephilim (Genesis 6:4), to Nimrod (Genesis 10:8-9), of Joshua (Joshua 6:2), of Boaz (Judges 11:1), of various of David’s warriors (2 Samuel 10:7), etc., etc., etc.
Thus, Nimrod seems to have become 1) heroic, 2) a giant only if he was tall (even one foot taller than average) and 3) a gibbor only in as much as he became heroic—he was known for his huntsman exploits. Sorry, but no high tech or otherwise genetic manipulation to see here.
Thus, as per Bob Schlenker Nimrod mutated and Ham mutated and he states more as to how and why, “Noah was perfect in his generations…Whether Noah’s wife…may have had genetic corruption…is not something I can say with certainty, but it seems likely…there is certainly the potential…If Noah’s wife had corrupted DNA then certainly Shem and Japheth had the potential for some degree of corruption” and on it goes.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help. Here is my donate/paypal page.
Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Twitter page, on my Facebook page and/or on my Google+ page.
Twitter: #BobSchlenker, #Serpentseed, #Seedlines
Facebook: #BobSchlenker, #Serpentseed, #Seedlines