This represents a sub portion, which began with part 1 and part 2, of a consideration of the Billy Meier UFO alien case posted, thus far, as part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4, part 5, part 6, part 7, part 8 and part 9.
Within a contact with Ptaah on September 1, 2010 AD, known as contact #501, Billy Meier related the following:
It was asked, why wasn’t it discovered earlier, that Isa Rashid had used old, traditional Christian terms in the translation of the scrolls, whereby things weren’t represented correctly. Also, it did, indeed, result that he also omitted important things because these didn’t fit into his lay priest concept. From my side, I didn’t know all this at that time, when I prepared the “Talmud Jmmanuel” for publication, and I also had no information from your or Arahat Athersata’s side.
In other words even Meier’s translation was lacking but how could anyone, having no manuscript to go, concluded that “things weren’t represented correctly” and that Isa “omitted important things”?
Note that Arahat Athersata is not a person but a level or plane wherein dwells pure spirit and it is said that it requires circa 60-80 billion years reach such a state.
Ptaah replies:
That’s right. Of course, we already knew from the outset about the fallibility with regard to the translations and about certain important omissions…But concerning his translation errors and omission errors, it is to be said that we deliberately let the whole thing run in the already executed manner because there would have been too much turmoil at that time and your life would have been endangered even more than it has been, if you had published the entire actual translation of the scroll…we said nothing about this and waited until the aggressiveness had smoothed itself, which has now been the case for quite some time…the time has become ripe to work on the correct translation and to disseminate it…
Assuming that this was the first time that Meier asked about this, and the context indicates that it is; the manuscript was allegedly found in 1963 AD, destroyed in 1974 AD and published in 1978 AD but it was not until 2010 AD that Meier asks about it. He is told that the whole thing was a styled set up. And, indeed, various versions have been published such as by Wild Flower Press in 1990 AD, Bridger House Publishers in 2005 AD, Steelmark LLC in 2007 AD, etc.
Billy Meier actually notes this as the conversation follows with him stating:
…of this, you have never said anything to me. Indeed, I knew that Isa Rashid wasn’t able to free himself completely from his faith in God and Jesus, as I have also found out that old, traditional Christian terms were used in the translation of Isa Rashid, but I didn’t know why you didn’t say anything about this. Due to the silence of you all, I assumed that everything, indeed, had its correctness and that everything corresponded to the contents of the scroll.
Ptaah replies:
That we didn’t speak with you about this, our further reason for this lies in the fact that you wouldn’t have been in agreement with the publication of the defectiveness of the translation; consequently, you would have insisted on writing and publishing the whole thing very exactly and correctly.
But this, as I already said, you wouldn’t have survived, as our possibility forecast had yielded. You would have been treacherously murdered through one of the assassination attempts, of which there would have been even more. Noting this in the newly revised and edited “Talmud Jmmanuel” would certainly be appropriate and useful.
In other words; now that you have been pummeled by historians, linguists, reporters and theologians we will let the alien cat out of the bad, admit that we allowed to publish faulty info and now tell you to revise, update, edit and publish a new version (cha-ching!). But, of course, upon what is Billy Meier to base his revision? There is no manuscript to, presumably, direct revelation from the Pleiadians / Plejarens.
Incidentally, there were a supposed 22 assassination attempts upon Meier over the years.
In the end, Billy Meier states that he will be “making the whole thing clear in an introduction in the ‘Talmud Jmmanuel’” and Ptaah reiterates that Billy’s reluctance to publish an imperfect text and their fear of his assassination is why “we didn’t mention the defectiveness.”