News of finds at an archeological dig in the Iranian province of Lorestan is an excellent example of that which I have been emphasizing for some time: the term “giant” merely means taller than the average. Additionally, I have been emphasizing that some people who base their “ministries,” books, lectures, websites, etc. on reporting on giants make much ado about nothing since nothing is just about all they have to report.
I decided to focus on Paul Seaburn’s article, “Skeleton of an Ancient Giant Found in Iran,” Mysterious Universe, February 15, 2017 AD. I did so because it present a mix and match of facts and speculations the likes of which I noted above.
We are told that from Chief archaeologist Ata Hasanpour, of the Islamic Azad University in Tehrān, “News of giant skeletons in Iran…a being much larger than humans living around 500 CE was found among artifacts” which means that this is “an exciting discovery even without the giant.”
Location
Pottery
Here is the locus of focus as a “skeleton measured over two meters (6 feet 6 inches) in height” and an astute observation by Seaburn, “making him a tall man today but a giant among his peers who averaged 160 cm (5 feet 3 inches).” Indeed, 6.6 is tall, taller than the average then and today but is not a “giant” of fanciful mythology.
We are also told that there is “no indication that the giant was treated with fear or respect when alive or in death” and that it “doesn’t sound like they thought he might be a biblical Nephilim.” Of course, why would they when the Nephilim when the Nephilim all drowned in the flood? Of which we have no indication that they were taller than the average much less much taller than the average. Also, if they were much taller than the average (as in mythical proportions) why would they think that a guy who is only about a foot taller than average is a Nephilim.
But then again, why rely on chronology—such as that the Nephilim drowned—when one can make statements such as:
Was this giant one of the rumored giants kept in suspended animation in stasis chambers for thousands of years – possibly using alien technology or even being members of an alien race themselves – to be reanimated at some pre-designated time or in the event of an emergency that causes someone to break the glass…
Seaburn concludes with noting that this tall person, “is probably just from a very tall man.” And his statement, “Whether its giants are mythical in stature or real in power” rightly goes to show a further point about the flexible nature of the term “giant.”
Seaburn’s article contains a collage of photos which, if they are from the actual site, show what one would expect from an unremarkable find—“unremarkable” in terms of, like, gigantic-Nephilim-alien-high tech-stasis chambers and stuff. In fact, from the tools in the background of the photo showing the skull we can see that it is of normal size (if that is even the skull in question as other, smaller, skeletons were found as well).
Skeletons (note tool vs. skull size in photo at bottom right)
But what is all of this stuff about “rumored giants kept in suspended animation in stasis chambers”? Well, as noted it is a nifty manner whereby to get around actual chronology. Also, it is based on claims and actually videos that have been circulating on the internet since circa 2008 AD.
One is titled, “В Иране найдена гробница возрстом 12 000 лет!” “Iran has found the tomb of vozrstom 12,000 years!” the other “На территории Ирана найдена гробница мага Яромира, возрстом 12 000 лет!” “On the territory of Iran found the tomb of the magician Jaromir, vozrstom 12,000 years!”
One thing is certain: whoever shot the video needs to work on their basic videography skill. The scene does not seem to be an archeological dig site but where it is, is difficult to discern as the video does not pan around the location—yet, everything is too clean.
One of the “stasis” chambers contains what appears to be a regular size (or smaller: compare size of the hand of the person holding the gadget) clay sculpture of a person.
Alleged stasis giant I
The other whether in the same location or not looks like it is covered in plastic meaning that the sculpture was covered in a glossy paint. This one can also be sized to normal due to the newspaper that was laid upon the body.
Alleged stasis giant II
Both are adorned with metal meant to look like gold—but it does not appear to actually be such. The “bodies” are also displayed with what appears to be a grab bag of objects such as from Egyptian and Sumerian cultures. This indicates that the display is not at a history or archeology museum, as they would know better, but perhaps some cultural center. This could be a display of how ancient royalty were entombed.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help. Here is my donate/paypal page.
Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Facebook page and/or on my Google+ page. You can also use the “Share / Save” button below this post.