In an article titled Kundalini and the Nephilim Deception, Amanda Buys has a commencing section titled, “Kundalini and the coming ‘alien’ deception …” (ellipses in original) wherein she notes that the Yoga based, “Kundalini spirit…This serpent spirit [Kundalini] is one of the manifestations of false holy spirit, who forms part of the Black Trinity” (brackets in original).
She elucidates, “two major points concerning Kundalini:…2. Understanding Nephilim and the coming ‘alien’ deception.”
She notes and quotes:
Genesis 6 and the Nephilim …
The following Scripture is key to understanding Nephilim …
Genesis 6…There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown (emphasis and brackets in original).
That was the King James Version after which she adds, “The Tanakh translates 12 the key verses as” the key portion of which is, “It was then, and later too, that the Nephilim appeared on earth—when the divine beings cohabited with the daughters of men, who bore them offspring. They were the heroes of old, the men of renown.”
Well, Tanakh is the Hebrew term to refer to the Old Testament but she was quoting Tanakh: The Holy Scriptures: A new translation of the Holy Scriptures according to the traditional Hebrew text (Jewish Publication Society, 1997, c1985).
She seems to have quoted that JPS version so as to emphasize, “then, and later too” since it seems to elucidate, “those days; and also after that.”
Her takeaway is:
Genesis 6 describes the first incursion of the fallen angels (translated as “sons of God” or “divine beings”) – those that rebelled against the LORD, and were cast out with satan – upon the earth. The passage describes these fallen angels co-habiting (having sexual relations) with mortal women, to birth hybrids (half supernatural beings, half mortal beings) called “Nephilim”.
Note how based on, “then, and later too”/“those days; and also after that,” Amanda Buys came to the non-sequitur merely asserted conclusion of a, “first incursion,” implying more to come. She came to the assertion of a first incursion without interacting with the text—stand by.
Also, note that there is no such thing as, “fallen angels…cast out with satan” since that is anachronistically mashing together more than one event: Satan, the Cherub, fell during the Gen 3 timeline, Angels fell during the Gen 6 timeline, they were, “cast” by Satan’s dragon metaphor’s tail (Rev 12) and they will both be, “cast” out of heaven to Earth after the war in heaven which is a post-Jesus’ ascension event.
She then asks and answers:
How is this incursion related to Noah and the flood?
The Scriptures tell us that Noah was a righteous man, “perfect” in his generations – meaning Noah and his sons had not been corrupted by this incursion of the fallen angels upon the earth. On the other hand, the passage tells us that – besides Noah and his family – the rest of man and beast had been corrupted.
You see, not only had man’s cup of iniquity become full, but that barrier established by God – that supernatural beings (fallen angels) were not to co-habit with man – had been crossed.
Let us pause on that point and continue by that she wrote:
So, how does this tie-in with Nephilim, “aliens”, Bible-prophecy, and End Times … and today?
In speaking about the End Times, Yˈshua [Jesus] tell us that:
Luke 17:26 “26 And as it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man.”
Matthew 24:37 “37 But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.”
Does this mean that in the End Times, there will be a final incursion of the fallen angels and Nephilim upon the earth? If so, do we see any evidence of this?
The answer to both questions is YES!
She also did not interact with this statement. Jesus’ words, His emphasis, His points, His context, were:
Just as it was in the days of Noah, so will it be in the days of the Son of Man. They were eating and drinking and marrying and being given in marriage, until the day when Noah entered the ark, and the flood came and destroyed them all.
But He kept speaking directly with:
Likewise, just as it was in the days of Lot—they were eating and drinking, buying and selling, planting and building, but on the day when Lot went out from Sodom, fire and sulfur rained from heaven and destroyed them all—so will it be on the day when the Son of Man is revealed (Luke 17).
Thus, this was about examples of being unaware/unconcerned about coming judgment.
Amanda Buys asserts:
Please note, there is much evidence that there are women today that have birthed Nephilim as a result of sexual relations with both demonic principalities and Nephilim.
The union between natural women and these principalities (fallen angels) results in a hybrid Nephilim.
In addition, there is evidence that Nephilim are also co-habiting with natural women, to again produce hybrid Nephilim.
We must remember that Nephilim are completely out of God’s Plan for man, and being a hybrid-mix, they cannot be saved or redeemed …
They are not humans in the proper Biblical understanding. That is why God had to destroy all of mankind with the flood except for Noah and his family (emphasis and ellipses in original).
Note the category errors: fallen Angels are now aka demonic and principalities and can still copulate as they did pre-flood.
In turn, post-flood neo-Nephilim also copulate and produce more Nephilim—and on it goes.
Note that pop-post-flood-Nephilologists always begin by throwing God and His Word under the bus.
Knowingly or not, purposefully or not, her view implies that God failed, that He missed a loophole and Buys’ managed to figure out, that the flood was much of a waste, etc., etc., etc.
Angels are always described as looking like human males, performing physical actions, and without indication that such is not their ontology—see my book, What Does the Bible Say About Angels? A Styled Angelology.
Yet, by definition, demons are spirits and cannot physically copulate—and there is no indication that they can produce offspring in any way, shape, or form—see my book What Does the Bible Say About Demons? A Styled Demonology.
A question that pop-Nephilologists much always be asked is just what it is they imply that God missed—that they managed to figure out—so, just how does Amanda Buys claim Nephilim got past the flood, past God?
Well, she already told us about her final incursion assertion.
She further noted:
…this final war against God through the co-mingling of man and the fallen angels of the kingdom of darkness – as there are many solid, Biblically-based researchers, teachers, and scholars that have done extensive research and study on this topic.
Well, Biblically-based researchers, teachers, and scholars that have done extensive research and study on this topic and conclude that there is no such thing as a, “final war against God through the co-mingling of man and the fallen angels” especially since such can, time and again, be shown to be pop-Nephilology which is un-biblical neo-theo sci-fi tall-tales sold to Christians: it is where the most embarrassingly ridiculous wild conspiracy theories that should die find a new home by being thrown in a blender & are mixed in till they leaven the whole lump.
At, “co-mingling” she footnoted:
It is also important to understand that previously in modern times, it was not just any woman who could birth a Nephilim.
Kundalini is positioned under the false holy spirit principality/The False Prophet; one can easily open yourself up to the Kundalini spirit through involvement in yoga, Freemasonry, New Age, the occult, drugs, and so forth … Only those women from the top thirteen royal-occult bloodlines, whose bloodlines were filled with generational iniquity and heavy involvement in the occult, and who had been highly programmed through DID/SRA, were able to birth Nephilim.
However, as of 2002 and the “Genesis Project”…it is now possible for a “normal” woman to birth a Nephilim. Take note! The women in the Genesis 6 account were “average” women! This ability for “normal” women to birth Nephilim is evidence we ARE in the last days, such as in the days of Noah!
Today, all that is needed for a woman to be abducted, or to birth a Nephilim, is for her to be dissociative (be DID, which in our modern society of broken people is quite common) and her bloodline to be “open” due to generational iniquity (something we are ALL subjected to unless healed and set free by the Blood of the Lamb!) (emphasis and ellipses in original).
Let us review and elucidate:
“a Nephilim” is grammatically incoherent since she mashed together the English plural, “a” with the Hebrew (male) plural, “im” so, it should either have been, “Nephilim” without the, “a” or, “a Nephil.”
Yoga is problematic enough without plugging un-biblical pop-Nephilology into it.
Nephilim is not just a generic concept so no one gets to just invent their own recipe for hot, fresh out of the oven, home-made Nephilim: they were the result of specifically physical sons of God mating with physical daughters of men and, “not just any woman” but women involved in/possessed by, etc., “Kundalini…false holy spirit principality/The False Prophet…yoga, Freemasonry, New Age, the occult, drugs” or the, “top thirteen royal-occult bloodlines…generational iniquity…highly programmed through DID/SRA” referring to Dissociative Identity Disorder and Satanic Ritual Abuse.
This is a form of what debaters call elephant hurling in terms of throwing everything at a wall and seeing what sticks—or can be asserted as sticking.
Yes, “The women in the Genesis 6 account were ‘average’ women!” but it is literally impossible that, “‘normal’ women” have been occultically ritualized, “to birth Nephilim” since the other end of that equation is physical mating with physical Angels and that has not been able to occur since the flood since Jude and 2 Peter 2 refer to a sin of Angels after which the Angels were incarcerated, and there is only a one-time fall/sin of Angels in the Bible.
Note how terribly vague Amanda Buys’ recipe is, “DID…quite common…generational iniquity…we are ALL subjected to.”
So, basically, virtually any and every woman on Earth is potentially able to birth Nephilim—still and again.
Keep in mind: God did not miss any proposed recipe.
She does note some allegedly, “Biblically-based researchers, teachers, and scholars”: LA Marzulli, Tom Horn, Derek Gilbert, Douglas Hamp, Chuck Missler, Doug Riggs, and the Prophecy In The News site along with a mention of Sid Roth.
Not surprisingly, at various levels of assertions, all of them teach un-biblical Nephilology—see my book Nephilim and Giants as per Pop-Researchers: A Comprehensive Consideration of the claims of I.D.E. Thomas, Chuck Missler, Dante Fortson, Derek Gilbert, Brian Godawa, Patrick Heron, Thomas Horn, Ken Johnson, L.A. Marzulli, Josh Peck, CK Quarterman, Steve Quayle, Rob Skiba, Gary Wayne, Jim Wilhelmsen, et al.
Now, there is a point at which some pop-Nephilologists become very, very dangerous—not just spiritually but physically—and is why in that book, I included a chapter tiled, “Nephil Kampf.”
Amanda Buys noted:
Riggs is a long-time pastor who has been – and is – helping/counseling women who have been Nephilim “mothers”, women who have actually birthed Nephilim “children”. Unlike the giants (the Nephilim) of the Old Testament, Nephilim today look very much like us humans, and have infiltrated all walks of life, in order to bring about the kingdom of darkness’ deception/agenda.
She footnoted:
Goliath and his brothers are examples of Nephilim in the Old Testament. Have you ever wondered why David chose five stones? He killed Goliath with one … but did you know that Goliath had four brothers, who were also giants?
Let us begin with this category error that violates the law of identity:
Goliath and his brothers were Rephaim, not Nephilim and we are told that about them virtually every single time they are mentioned—Nephilim were strictly pre-flood hybrids, Rephaim were strictly post-flood humans, and there’s zero correlation between them.
As for, “were also giants” well, that begs these questions: What’s the usage of the vague, generic, subjective, multi-usage and modern English word “giants” in English Bibles? What’s Buys’ usage? Do those two usages agree?
I am going to assume that the answer to the last question is, “No” since the answer to the first one is something unstated about vaguely subjective generic height at some level above the parochial average. And yet, in the English Bibles that employ the term giants, it merely renders (does not even translate) Nephilim in 2 verses or Repha/im in 98% of all others and so never even hints at anything to do with any sort of height whatsoever.
Yet, she also wrote of, “giants (the Nephilim)” which biblically contextually would mean, “Nephilim (the Nephilim)” so do you see what a useless word that is?
So, it seems that whenever she read the word giants in the English Bible she is using, she merely assumes a reference to Nephilim. And such is the folly of chasing an English word around a Hebrew Bible.
As for, “Unlike the giants” and, “Nephilim today look very much like us humans” well, every indication is that they always did since the dirty little secret is that since we’ve no reliable physical description of Nephilim then their height is a non-issue.
The un-biblical mere assertion is that neo-Nephilim, “look very much like us humans, and have infiltrated all walks of life, in order to bring about the kingdom of darkness’ deception/agenda
The un-biblical mere assertion is that neo-Nephilim, “look very much like us humans” so the way to identify them is to just point to people who look like people and claim Nephilim!!!!!
And recall that these have, “infiltrated all walks of life, in order to bring about the kingdom of darkness’ deception/agenda,” they are, “completely out of God’s Plan” who, “cannot be saved or redeemed” who were, “why God had to destroy all of mankind with the flood except for Noah and his family” Amanda Buys tells us they, “are EVIL, satanic, and of the kingdom of darkness. They are NOT our friends, and are not here to help us in anyway – they have a demonic agenda against God and His Creation”: how little will it take someone involved in the incoherent madness which is pop-Nephilology to do something drastically dangerous?
We have people like the plagiarist and evolutionist Steven Quayle telling Christians that we will have to fight against Nephilim and kill them with copper tipped arrows/spears/bullets or whatever your favorite weapon may be.
She leaves us with, “this article is to send out a warning … to awaken the Body of Messiah (and anyone else who will hear!), that supernatural activity is increasing, and the kingdom of darkness is stepping up the war in a big way – they know the time is short!”
As for the aforementioned Doug Riggs, in “To Whom is the Arm of the Lord Revealed?” – by Pastor Doug Riggs : Morning Star Testimony – Sermon Notes a certain John Mark noted:
In my listening to this message I learned something I hadn’t heard before. Doug was talking about Satan’s attempt to wage war against the Lord and to keep Him from returning. Speaking of hybrids (i.e.: Nephilim), I understood him to say that when they are killed (this happens in countless rituals to empower the earthly rulers and those in society that obtain much wealth and power), a demon is released, and these are not numbered in the third of the angels that fell when Lucifer rebelled. Angels are not demons; demons are the disembodied spirits of the hybrids. Those locked up in Tartarus are those demon spirits from the hybrids that were killed in Noah’s flood. Today there are so many more than what are there.
That demons are the spirits of dead Nephilim is just folklore from centuries, if not millennia, after the Torah. For a biblical view, please see my article Demons Ex Machina: What are Demons?
The, “not numbered in the third of the angels that fell when Lucifer rebelled” statement is doubly fallacious: 1) that was Angels, not demons so that’s technically a category error and 2) Lucifer rebelled during the Gen 3 timeline but the Angles fell during the Gen 6 timeline.
As for, “Those locked up in Tartarus are those demon spirits” not so, 2 Peter 2 tells us its Angels.
A PDF by Doug Riggs that’s titled Mt. Hermon & THE TRANSFIGURATION: “A SHOT ACROSS THE COSMIC BOW to Principalities and Powers” & Jesus Christ: The Bright Morning Star includes an excerpt from a certain Sue Bradley that notes:
“It came to pass after the sons of men had multiplied in those days, that daughters were born to them, elegant and beautiful. And when the Watchers, the sons of heaven, saw them, they became infatuated with
them, saying to each other, “Come, let us choose for ourselves wives from the offspring of men, and let us have children….
The whole number of those who descended on what is the top of Mount Hermon, in the days of Jared, was two hundred. 8 That mountain therefore came to be Hermon, because they had sworn upon it, and bound themselves by mutual oaths…” – 1 Enoch 6:1, 2, 7, 8
Michael S. Heiser, examines many of the intriguing details and nuances coincident to Mount Hermon…
Mount Hermon was, according to 1 Enoch 6:1-6, the mountain to which the Watchers, the sons of God, descended when they came to earth and cohabited with human women. This connection with the incident described in Genesis 6:1-4 is consistent in view of the connections between the terms Rephaim, Anakim, and Nephilim…
So with 1 Enoch as a premise (that text is Bible contradicting folklore from centuries, if not millennia, after the Torah, see my book In Consideration of the Book(s) of Enoch) we end up with Mount Hermon being where fallen Angels landed on Earth: this was clearly a polemic since when that text was written, Pagans revered that mount.
Only pop-Nephilology makes, inviable, “connections between the terms Rephaim, Anakim, and Nephilim” and that’s because Nephilim were strictly pre-flood hybrids, Rephaim were strictly post-flood humans, and there’s zero correlation between them and Anakim were like a clan of the Rephaim tribe.
“Nephilim Mothers” A Clarification and Explanation is a PDF by Doug Riggs which notes:
All the women I have worked with who have reported conceiving Nephilim hybrids are Christians.
Nephilim cannot be saved and have no desire to be saved because they are not human… Nephilim CANNOT be saved nor do they have any desire to be saved because they are not human; they do not have a human soul.
For the past 28 years every woman I have worked with who has been a part of the hybrid breeding program has dissociated Nephilim ‘parts’ represented in her internal DID [Dissociative Identity Disorder] system and phenomenology which is the result of her conditioning and programming.
In every case when the core person working with and through the Christian presenter joins or merges with that which is perceived to be non-human or Nephilim, the programming is broken, tension and core conflict is resolved, and the person comes to know the truth of what really happened to them.
The statement, “All the women I have worked with who have reported conceiving Nephilim hybrids are Christians” should discredit him to the point that all he can do to make a living is to get a job stating, “Do you want fries with that?” It’s peak incoherence.
So, somehow, Christians birthed babies who, “cannot be saved…because they are not human…do not have a human soul” which is a very, very dangerous thing: why not just abort them or murderer them at any point during their lives since they’re just hell-fodder, right?
It’s that special? “the programming is broken, tension and core conflict is resolved, and the person comes to know the truth” that she birthed a literal unhuman soulless monster!!!!!!!
This is beyond delusion.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby.
If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help out.
Here is my donate/paypal page.
You can comment here and/or on my Twitter/X page, on my Facebook page, or any of my other social network sites all which are available here.
Leave a Reply