What we mean by “displays” is graphic photographic displays of what Pro-Abortion proponents call “byproducts of conception,” i.e.—and there should be no sugarcoated way to say this—discarded, mutilated baby corpses.
Of course, these are not Pro-Life displays but are Pro-Abortion displays as they are the visual record of that which Pro-Abortionists support with thoughts, words and votes.
There was such a display at our local university and people actually took the time to write up protest signs that said things like “I’m offended or insulted by this display.” This makes one wonder when right and wrong came to be based on pure emotional offence. Also, what happened to the politically correct commandment, “If it offends you do not complain but just look away”? Obviously, it is utterly repulsive to look at such photos but the real oddity is that the photos offend people and so they protest the Pro-Lifers. See the point?
The photos are offensive because they are offensive. They are offensive because they depict the results of offensive actions. They are offensive because they make Pro-Lifers face that which they support. If you are offended by the photos then you should not be upset by the effect but you aught to strike at the cause. It is abortion that produces such gore.
Protesting the Pro-Lifers for interfering in the neat little out of sight, out of mind plan of the Pro-Abortionists is tantamount to protesting the Jews for displaying photos of victims of the Nazi holocaust. The reason that the images are offensive is that abortion is offensive. Ceasing abortion would likewise cease such offensive photos.
Someone pseudonymed redmcclain explained Why I Escort (January 22, 2007 AD, here, escort means ushering women into abortuaries so that they are comforted as they prepare to end their very own baby’s life).
Redmcclain complains about, get this, “large vivid signs of innocent looking babies.” Note that in her stunningly twisted mine the babies are innocent looking (not actually innocent?).
Notice the morally bankrupt view presented here: abortion is not immoral but showing the effect of an abortion is immoral. If the result is offensive then the cause is even more so.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BOOKS:
Bernard Nathanson, The Hand of God: A Journey from Death to Life by the Abortion Doctor Who Changed His Mind
Randy C. Alcorn, Why Pro-Life?: Caring for the Unborn and Their Mothers
Randy C. Alcorn, Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments Expanded & Updated
Scott Klusendorf, Pro-Life 101: A Step-by-Step Guide to Making Your Case Persuasively
ESSAYS:
“Sacred Abortion”
Richard Dawkins – On Abortion, Tadpoles, Rape, Cows, Murder and Sheep
The Exorcist’s Abortion and the Satanist’s Repentance
George Tiller, Abortionist Murders, and the Richard Dawkins Correlation
Is pro-life and pro-death penalty a contradiction?
Dan
Barker – His Views On Human Dignity
The
Abortion Money Machine Rolls Out the Ads in the UK
Pro-abortionists target pro-lifers
Greg Koukl on pro-abortion “logic”
Abortion and the Intolerance of the Pseudo-Tolerant