tft-short-4578168
Ken Ammi’s True Free Thinker:
BooksYouTube or OdyseeTwitterFacebookSearch

Channeling aliens

This series, beginning at part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4, part 5 and part 6, is a consideration of the book Discerning Alien Disinformation written by Montalk. We will consider alien types and whether there are positive and negative ones. Montalk is not a Christian and is very insightful. There are areas of agreement as well as disagreement.

If you have ever heard New Agers and other oculists speak about their various spirit guides—by whatever terms they call them such as ascended masters, familiar spirits, etc.—you will note that they emphasize synchronicities. It is therefore, interesting that Montalk wrote about:

“artificial synchronicities (freak coincidences designed to create misleading impressions that a certain decision is the right one), disinformative dreams or visions.”

The point about disinformative dreams is interesting in light of Jeremiah 29:8 which states:

“For thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel; Let not your prophets and your diviners, that be in the midst of you, deceive you, neither hearken to your dreams which ye cause to be dreamed.”

As noted in our previous segment, in the Avenues of Disinformation section of his book, Montalk wrote that “Channeling involves…allowing themselves to be used by unseen intelligences who communicate information through them…channeled sources may claim to be anything ranging from aliens to angels, deceased persons to demonic beings, famous individuals in history, time travelers, other dimensional entities, the subconscious, and impersonal archetypes.”

We have touched upon this in the article Likenesses between spirit channeler mediums and alien contactees/experiencers.

Montalk also states that even though channeling can be used by manipulative beings and humans, the advantage for the manipulators that:

“Discarnate entities, alien beings, and advanced human military factions can transmit verbal and visual information remotely, whether electromagnetically or telepathically. They also have limited ability to induce paranormal phenomena, predict the future, and arrange synchronistic events…Channeling also affords deceptive sources anonymity and freedom to fabricate an identity and back-story…The same source can change identities repeatedly to whatever sounds most authoritative.”

With this as a foundation, he further notes:

“Establishing and maintaining a connection requires mental dissociation so that the source can come through clearly without restriction by the conscious mind of the channeler. This amounts to a relinquishing of freewill, and a manipulative entity may abuse this offer by sinking roots into the mind of the channeler, deeper than it could otherwise.

In worst cases this can lead to possession, where the channeler not only transmits disinformation during specified sessions, but becomes a walking extension of the negative entity, serving an agenda in broader ways. Conscious abandonment over the channeling process may also grow into habitual abandonment of discernment and critical thinking, whereby the channeler simply accepts and relays what is transmitted after having been won over with convenient but trivial truths.”

Moreover, he writes:

“Being just the messenger frees a channeler from having to personally defend the information received. The source is likewise freed from always having to back up its claims, relying instead on self-proclaimed authority and various specious excuses.

Through channeling, disinformation is given unlimited creative latitude, taking bold and direct expressions since claims that are too far-fetched for other audiences will readily be accepted by channeling enthusiasts. If especially entertaining and fascinating, source and channeler rise to cult or celebrity status, which adds to the authority factor that overrides critical thinking.”

As for that which is readily accepted by channeling enthusiasts; those who read my article Conversation with a New Ager will recall that this came up as the New Ager repeatedly referred to “my readings” and claimed to discern the truth of those readings via her heart (which, I got her to admit, is a faulty filter).


Posted

in

by

Tags: