The Unexplained Collective posted
…my new video and I think you will really like it. The first in a new series I plan to do on the Giants known as The Nephilim and the fact that they were here in Mississippi before the Choctaw Indians arrived!!!
I, True Freethinker, thought to note
Rather than “Giants known as The Nephilim” you mean “Nephilim known as The Giants.” “Nephilim Giants” contextually means “Nephilim Nephilim”: “Giants” isn’t a description, it’s just a rendering of “earth-born.”
The Unexplained Collective
As the origins of these beings is not proven, much less their existence, I won’t assume every gian was a nephilim ore that nephilim even existed. I won’t make a conclusion about who they were or what they were.
True Freethinker
That actually has nothing to do with my comment. Note that I noted, “‘Nephilim Giants’ contextually means ‘Nephilim Nephilim’” so that should have alerted you that when you write something like, “I won’t assume every gian[t] was a nephilim” that means, “I won’t assume every nephilim was a nephilim.”
So, the key question are:
What’s the usage of the vague, generic, subjective, multi-usage and modern English word “giants” in English Bibles?
What’s your usage of the vague, generic, subjective, multi-usage and modern English word “giants”?
Do those two usages agree?
The Unexplained Collective
If I went without a name or this prior culture, it would not make any sense. We don’t know who they were. We don’t know what they called themselves. We simply know from uncovered bodies there was a culture of very large humans associated with locations of advanced cultures. As a collective of inquiring minds, we need to have a term usage that will describe what culture we are discussing. As mucdh a vaguary as “giants” may be to your viewpoint, I will continue to use it to describe the aforementioned culture until a better more accurate name can be given.
True Freethinker
Fascinatingly, I’ve asked those key questions to dozens and dozens and dozens upon dozens of people who go on and on and on and on about “giants” and literally zero have replied.
We know who they were, that’s why we can discuss them.
It’s actually not an issue of, “We don’t know what they called themselves” since we have enough data to be able to determine that when we discuss it, “Rather than ‘Giants known as The Nephilim’ you mean ‘Nephilim known as The Giants.’ ‘Nephilim Giants’ contextually means ‘Nephilim Nephilim’: ‘Giants’ isn’t a description, it’s just a rendering of ‘earth-born.’”
“uncovered bodies” of what and where?
“large” is just as vague, generic, subjective, and multi-usage as the other modern English word “giants.”
By definition you’re not describing anything by the word “giants” especially when you’re asked about it and can’t reply as to what you mean by it, what the Bible means by it, and if those agree.
That brought the discussion to an end as no more replies were forthcoming.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby.
If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help out.
Here is my donate/paypal page.
You can comment here and/or on my Twitter/X page, on my Facebook page, or any of my other social network sites all which are available here.
Leave a Reply