To date, all we have of the new SkyWatch TV DVD series is the Angels & Giants Docu-Series Trailer.
The reference to “Giants” begs these key questions:
What’s the usage of the vague, generic, subjective, multi-usage and modern English word “giants” in English Bibles?
What’s SkyWatch’s usage of the vague, generic, subjective, multi-usage and modern English word “giants”?
Do those usages agree?
Straight away, the vid refers to “six fingers, red-haired giants that were 9, 10, 12 feet tall” so their usage, at least in part, appears to be something to do with subjectively unusual height.
At least we know they’re not referring to Nephilim since we’ve no reliable physical description of them so can’t say anything backed with any data about their fingers, hair, or height.
Reference is made to that “giants” were “cannibalistic…sexually perverse, sadistic, bite your head off drink all the blood out of your body…like popping a top off a Coca-Cola” which are great creepy stories but have nothing to do with any biblical data about anyone—with the exception of general sexual perversion but then again, since we know who is being referred to as “giants” we can’t know whom to investigate.
But when biblical data is lacking in backing tall-tales, SkyWatch instantly turns to the Book of Enoch which is Bible contradicting folklore from millennia after the Torah—see the book, In Consideration of the Book(s) of Enoch.
SkyWatch knows that even tall-tales backed by folklore isn’t enough to they add sci-fi to the mix along with (even more) mere assertions, “members of the Divine realm were allowed to come through a portal, from one dimension into our dimension…at what they call Gilgal Rephaim, which translates loosely as Wheel of the Giants.”
That it “translates loosely” as such is even an over-statement since that wouldn’t be a translation, however loose, but a rendering.
It goes back to the key questions since the “Giants” which renders “Rephaim” is merely doing that: it’s rendering “Rephaim” and is not implying anything whatsoever about subjectively unusual height.
SkyWatch then adds this to the mix “the reason why all this matters is because Bashan, which also means the Land of the Serpent” based on linguistic machinations “was the place where the giant Og reigned.”
SkyWatch is misusing the term “giant” since biblically contextually “giant Og” would be accurately rendered as “Repha Og” which is all that English Bibles are telling us when they refer to him as a “giant.”
For some reason, SkyWatch thinks something to the likes of that ancient people couldn’t really figure out how to make a circle of rocks or would not have made one for any practical purpose—or something—so they take the sci-fi up another notch by asserting “a pile of 42,000 tons of stone circles that there’s no way you can appreciate it unless you’re high up in the sky.”
It’s literally merely asserted “early Israelites identified it as the work of giant” about which we must ask at least three question: 1) to what does “early” refer? 2) what makes them assert so? 3) what’s meant by “giant”?
But we then get some clue about the answer to “3)” since directly following, it’s stated “Circle of the Giants is a better
translation of Gilgal Rephaim…could some of these wonders be the metaphorical handprints of the giants spoken of in Genesis”?
Typical of pop-Nephilology is to use the term “giants” to refer to various things and never once defining the term nor usage: watering down terminology makes it easier to wave tall-tales since unrelated data points can be claimed to be connected when actually, no such connections are cogent.
Note, for example, that we were told that Rephaim is translated as giants but now that Nephilim is translated as giants and that while Circle of the Giants is a better translation of Gilgal Rephaim it’s now Circle of the Giants being a better translation of Gilgal Nephilim.
We’re then moved from the Middle East to that “Peru this is the region where the strongest evidence for the presence of the Watchers and the Nephilim on Earth can be found” due to “the largest megalithic wall in the world” which is a conclusion based on the non sequitur that large things must have been built for and by large people.
And that is about it for the trailer of the new un-biblical-neo-theo-sci-fi-tall-tales docu-series trailer.
I posted this comment to the video on YouTube:
It seems that the word “giants” is being used to refer to three different things so the key questions are:
What’s the usage of the vague, generic, subjective, multi-usage and modern English word “giants” in English Bibles?
What’s SkyWatch’s usage of the vague, generic, subjective, multi-usage and modern English word “giants”?
Do those usages agree?
Incidentally, I have literally asked those question to dozens upon dozens of post-flood-giant-Nephilologists and literally zero have answered them—even though they go on and on and on and on about giants.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help out. Here is my donate/paypal page.
Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Twitter page, on my Facebook page, or any of my other social network sites all which are available here.