“…The world can only hope that people like David Wood, Ken Ammi, and all the other conservative Christians, catch Zika or Malaria and disappear from the face of the Earth…
‘You People’ are the most despicable, violent, sub-humans on the planet
…”
—Neo from the (pseudo) Skeptic Arena
Herein I continue considering Neo, of the Skeptic Arena (and at this link you can find this whole series), condemning David Wood, Christianity, the Bible, God, etc., etc., etc., whilst failing to provide a premise upon which to base his condemnations.
Here is Neo’s reply to the reply I noted in the previous segment which stated, in part, “without a premise upon which to base your condemnations then your condemnations mean utterly nothing.”
Here is Neo’s reply:
Ken, everyone on the cc list is waiting for you to explain why you worship a evil murdering monster. Everyone can see that no matter how many times you are asked … you refuse to defend your god. [ellipses in original] Why won’t you stand up for Him? Everyone is waiting for you to explain why you defend a psychopathic nutjob like David Wood who worships the same evil, invisible monster that you do. How does that make you any better than Catholics who defend their pedophile priests? Obviously, your distraction techniques only work on other Ghost Worshipers; and you have no idea how to get yourself out of this, do you Ken?
You are like a deer caught in the headlights, reduced to repeating the same thing over and over, which explains why there isn’t enough left of you … to make Road Kill Soup. [ellipses in original]
Note that the only thing he ever accomplished is to add condemnations to his bottomless pile of baseless condemnations.
He even gets it wrong in claiming that I “defend a psychopathic nutjob like David Wood.” You see, I have been asking Neo to provide a premise upon which he condemns “a psychopathic nutjob like David Wood” which Neo never did. Conversely, I can condemn David Wood’s pre-Christian actions based on the fact that he attacked his dad in an extremely violent manner and this is condemnable because his dad was created and made in the image of a God whose very essence is the very essence of ethics in the first place.
I again ignored his childish taunting and remained focus upon the goal of having Neo justify his condemnations upon his Atheist worldview philosophy:
Well, I am wondering if everyone on the cc list is waiting is waiting for you to stop spamming/trolling them but, alas.
Friend, once again, you are attempting to draw attention away from your inability to premise a moral condemnation.Let me put it this way: you have a category into which you place items that you consider condemnable. What I am asking is not what items do you consider condemnable but rather how you build that category in the first place: upon what basis, what premise, what foundation, etc.
I asked you this from the very first time you included me in your email to David so the ball has been in your court ever since.
Simply adding items to your category such as “evil,” “murdering, “psychopathic,” “nutjob, “pedophile,” etc., etc., etc. does not let us know why you think these things are bad, wrong, evil or however you would term it.
You keep on displaying the very fact that your worldview has left you utterly unable to condemn anything at all and that is one of the great tragedies of Atheism.
We will consider Neo’s reply in the next segment.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help. Here is my donate/paypal page.
Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Facebook page and/or on my Google+ page.
Twitter: #SkepticArena, #DavidWood, #Atheism
Facebook: #SkepticArena, #DavidWood, #Atheism