“Sleep Paralysis – What it is and How to Stop it” by Chris White, book review

Paperback: 156 pages Publisher: CWM Publishing; 1 edition (February 20, 2014 AD) ISBN-10: 0991232917 ISBN-13: 978-0991232918

Sleep Paralysis – What it is and How to Stop it

I have posted the article Sleep paralysis in the Bible. Thus, when Chris White published Sleep Paralysis – What it is and How to Stop it, interest was piqued (see end of article for a list on his other books).

“Chris is an author, filmmaker and host of several online radio programs on various subjects. He is also the director of the internet radio station called The Revelations Radio Network. He produces documentaries and short videos for educational purposes.”

Chris White, “organized what may be the largest survey about sleep paralysis ever performed in order to try to understand more about the phenomenon. You can still see the form that more than 1,200 people filled out at the survey website www.SleepSurvey.com.”

Some of the topics within the book are:
What is sleep paralysis? including “The mainstream explanation” and what’s wrong with it.
The spiritual causes of sleep paralysis including cultural beliefs about it.
How to stop sleep paralysis including advice for people of all beliefs.
FAQ
Sleep paralysis stories submitted by individuals.

So, what is sleep paralysis:

“According to one definition, sleep paralysis is a phenomenon in which people, either upon falling asleep or awakening, temporarily experience the inability to move, and it is often associated with terrifying sensations. There is such a wide range of things that people experience in sleep paralysis that it would be difficult to detail each specific thing; though visions, sounds, smells and physical contact have all been reported. Some cases can be considered very mild, while others quite severe and frightening, but in almost every case there is some form of paralysis (the inability to move).

In addition to the paralysis, nearly all of the experiencers report the feeling that there is an evil or menacing presence in the room, even if they don’t actually see anything there. This feeling has been called ‘felt presence’ by the scientific community…”

Chris White references mild cases which “usually lasts for less than a minute and occurs only a few times in a person’s life”:

“Recent studies have shown that 6.2% of the population has experienced this at least once, though there is reason to believe that the numbers are much higher than this. Other studies have shown that almost 30% of a randomly sampled student population has experienced sleep paralysis.”

At this point, let us come to the point of full disclosure (or as full as I care to divulge personal info) as I experienced a mild case or, a mild-mild case of sleep paralysis. In fact, it was not until years and years later that I heard someone speaking on the subject and when they mentioned the feeling like something sat on your bed, I thought, “Wow, that’s what it was!”

63059336902d2da6b5930eae467e61c0-1745822

The mild case occurred in my life BC and all that such a life brought along with it. At the time, a house mate and I told each other that we felt that there was a presence in the house. I was taking a nap one day and felt the bed give—something sat on your bed—and thought that my house mate had laid down next to me. However, as the pillow I was laying on curved upwards since my head pushed down the middle of it, I could not see next to me. I attempted to life my head to look but could not move. Being such a mellow guy, I recall simply thinking, “Well, I can’t do anything about it so, I might as well enjoy the experience” and I do not remember anything after that. Well, I now realize two things: 1) there may be many people who have experiences that they enjoy, in some form or another and 2) enjoying them, much less seeking them out, is utter folly and dangerous—it is tantamount to a litigious invitation.

My house mate also had a mild sleep paralysis experience, but of a very different sort. She relates that she was sleeping on her back and awoke to feel something pressing down on her chest, like something sitting thereon. She felt something tightening around her neck and attempted to call to me and reach out but could not move nor speak.

As for the scientific community’s view of sleep paralysis, Chris White notes:

“Let’s take the studies about the threat activated vigilance system and the amygdala. Using neuroimaging techniques, scientists were able to determine that the amygdala was active during sleep paralysis. That’s pretty much it. From there they made the claim that this activation of the fear center of the brain was the cause of the hallucinations…
I hope to show you that the belief that these are not hallucinations at all but something real, is a view that can be logically, even scientifically, defended.”

An anecdote from the Sleep paralysis stories section of the book has someone noting the following:

“I read that the hallucination are caused by the person panicking when they realize they cannot move, but my experiences were the opposite; each time, I saw he so-called hallucination, and when I tried to react, it was then that I realized I could not move – not the other way around. None of it seemed right to me, but I didn’t know what to think, so I tried to ignore it.”

In the “Mankind’s claims about the spirit world” section, he notes:

“…spirit beings were known to be untrustworthy according to those that interacted with them. They could apparently appear in any form that they chose, something that is true in sleep paralysis as well. More interesting than this though is that they often used this ability to deceive people into doing various immoral things, or simply to cause fear.”

He mentions, for example, the Ouija board (about which we wrote in the article Is the Ouija board dangerous?):

“It’s just cardboard and ink. It has no power of its own. It is simply a vehicle for a human to ask for contact with spirits in their hearts, even if they don’t actually say it with their mouths. When you sit down and play with a Ouija board, get a tarot card reading, or one of several other activities, what you are saying in your heart is: ‘spirits, I want you to be here. I want to contact you.’ You are giving them the only thing they need – permission.”

This “permission” is that to which I was referring as litigious invitation.

As for stopping it, the book spends most of its time here—via Chris White’s writing as well as within the Sleep Paralysis Stories section:

“There are essentially two types of stopping sleep paralysis. The first type is stopping sleep paralysis in the middle of an event. This is especially helpful for those that are used to sleep paralysis experiences lasting a long time, or if there is sexual violation occurring, but really any sleep paralysis event can be cut short using the methods laid out. The second type is stopping sleep paralysis from happening altogether, to be free from sleep paralysis for good.”

And the astonishing aspect of this book is that it claims to be able to show you how to stop sleep paralysis from happening altogether, to be free from sleep paralysis for good.

Here is a list of Chris White’s books:
Sleep Paralysis – What it is and How to Stop it

Mystery Babylon – When Jerusalem Embraces The Antichrist: An Exposition of Revelation 18 and 19

Daniel: A Commentary

Should Christians Keep the Sabbath?: A Refutation of Seventh Day Adventism and the Hebrew Roots Movement – audio and Kindle

The Prewrath Rapture

Pro-abortionists target pro-lifers

CHRISTIANITY
Christianity

Christian Apologetics

Bible

God – Theology

Problem of Evil – Theodicy

Jesus

Nephilim – Giants

Book of Enoch

Serpent Seed

Satanic Serpent & Dragon

Angels

Cherubim & Seraphim

Satan / Devil

Demons

Miracles

Inspirational

Unbelievers Compliment Christianity

Da Vinci Code / Angels and Demons / Templars, etc.

Gospel of Judas

The Lost Tomb of Jesus

————-
ATHEISM
Atheism

New Atheists

Project-Answering Atheism

Richard Dawkins

Sam Harris

Christopher Hitchens

Dan Barker

Daniel Dennett

Bart Ehrman

Bill Maher

PZ Myers

Quentin Smith

Michael Shermer

John Loftus

Ricky Gervais

Raphael Lataster

Carl Sagan

Atheism’s Public Relations Problems

Atheist Bus Ads and Billboards

Atheist Child Rearing

Atheist Charity

American Atheists

American Humanist Association

The Skeptic Arena

ExChristian.Net

PositiveAtheism.org

Evilbible.com

Science Club of Long Island

Skeptic’s Annotated Bible

Capella’s Guide to Atheism

The BOBA Digest

————-
RELIGIONS
Judaism (Rabbinic, Messianic, etc.)

Baha’i

Islam

Jehovah’s Witnesses

Mormonism

Catholicism

Scientology – Dianetics – L. Ron Hubbard

Unitarian Universalism

Misc. Religions

————-
FRINGE-OLOGY
Transhumanism

UFOs and Aliens

Billy Meier

Whitley Strieber

Robert Temple-Sirius Mystery

Conspiracy theories, Illuminati, New World Order (NWO), etc.

Occult, Witchcraft, Magick, satanism, etc.

Satanic Crime

————-
SCIENCE
Science

Creation Science

Intelligent Design

Cosmology

Evolution

The Wedgie Document

————-
MOVIES & TV SHOWS

Movies

Alchemical Hollywood

Transhuman Hollywood

————-
MISC.
Adolf Hitler / Nazism / Communism

The Crusades

Morality / Ethics

Abortion

Rape

Meaning and Purpose

Homosexuality

Postgender Androgyny, Hermaphroditism & Beyond

Debates

Pop Culture and Politics

————-
RESOURCES
Fitness

Audio

Books

TFT essay “Books”

Debate

Links

Video

Find it Fast – Fast Facts

Visuals – Illustrations and Photos

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Richard Dawkins

Send in the Clowns – Richard Dawkins Obliges

The Dawk Pieper Was at it Again

The Dawkinsian cult of personality hero worshipers speak

The God Delusion is a Funny Book

The God Delusion is an Amusing Book

The Latest Dawkins Spanking

The New Atheism: A Quest of Confusion-Part I

The Quadripartite Equine Riders, part 1 of 11

The Wizard of Biomorph Land

Too Sexy for My Theology? On the New Atheist Obsession with Sex

Torture, the Hell of Atheism and the “Gentle Pedophile”

US Christians must learn from UK Christians: Richard Dawkins was right

VIDEO: “Atlas of Creation” evidence against evolution

VIDEO: Atheism and rape – a disturbing compilation

VIDEO: Atheist Ancient Aliens

VIDEO: Caught on tape: Richard Dawkins’ rare moment of clarity

VIDEO: Darwin’s monkey man

VIDEO: Dawkinsian Atheist evolutionists follow their leader

VIDEO: Does Atheist Jonathan Miller have a brain (& Dawkins’ “faith”)?

VIDEO: Dr. Drew and Zoey Tur accuse Richard Dawkins of hate speech

VIDEO: Is nothing something Richard Dawkins?

VIDEO: Is Richard Dawkins self-loathing?

VIDEO: Lawrence Krauss & Richard Dawkins vs. Julie Andrews

VIDEO: Proof of Atheist indoctrination of children via evolution

VIDEO: Richard Dawkins behind the scenes at Oxford

VIDEO: Richard Dawkins on junk DNA

VIDEO: Richard Dawkins on morality & me on Atheists’ ignorance of the Bible

VIDEO: Richard Dawkins tries Michael Persinger’s “God Helmet”

VIDEO: Richard Dawkins’ The God Delusion is funny and amusing

Richard Dawkins

Atheist T-Shirts – Get’em While They’re Hip

Atheist vs. Atheist – Richard Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Atheists: “No God, No Reason, Just Whining”

Books on atheism, the new atheists and Richard Dawkins

Camp Quest – Abandon Hope All Ye Who Enter Here

Charity – Secular Liberals vs. Religious Conservatives

Christopher Hitchens Zings Richard Dawkins

Dan Barker – On His Agnosis

Dawkins Comes Out As An Intelligent Design Proponent!!!

Do Christians believe in talking donkeys and talking serpents?

Does the Bible Command Rape?

Four Succinct Statements on Suffering

Free e-book: “The God Delusion” by Richard Dawkins

From Zeitgeist to Poltergeist, Part 1 of 13

G. K. Chesterton nails Richard Dawkins

Gary DeMar – audio on atheism

George Tiller, Abortionist Murders, and the Richard Dawkins Correlation

How to Debate Theism/Atheism

I Shalt Have No Other gods Before Me

In Which I Agree With Richard Dawkins on Intelligent Design

Introducing the Dawkinsian Weltanschauung

Is (as per Richard Dawkins) belief in God a betrayal of science?

Is education the only antidote to religion? Richard Dawkins says yes

Is Richard Dawkins a Fundamentalist? (9 Part Series)

Atheist Quotes / Atheism Quotes – Richard Dawkins Quotes

Below are some choice quotes by Richard Dawkins (and a couple about Richard Dawkins).

This post may grow if and when I can manage to stomach tainting my mind by calling into remembrance the vast amounts of Richard Dawkins’ bio-chemically educed brain secretions expressed as writing that I have read or if anyone places some good quotes into the comments section.

Richard Dawkins,

Highly intelligent people are mostly atheists.1

Richard Bube (Physicist, and former Chairman of the Department of Materials Science at Stanford),

There are proportionately as many atheistic truck drivers as there are atheistic scientists.2

About Richard Dawkins:
Alvin Plantinga, The Dawkins Confusion – Naturalism ad Absurdum:

Now despite the fact that this book [The God Delusion] is mainly philosophy, Dawkins is not a philosopher (he’s a biologist). Even taking this into account, however, much of the philosophy he purveys is at best jejune. You might say that some of his forays into philosophy are at best sophomoric, but that would be unfair to sophomores; the fact is (grade inflation aside), many of his arguments would receive a failing grade in a sophomore philosophy class. This, combined with the arrogant, smarter-than-thou tone of the book, can be annoying. I shall put irritation aside, however and do my best to take Dawkins’ main argument seriously.

Dinesh D’Souza interviewed by Vox Day,

This is Richard Dawkins and it clearly shows what happens when you let a biologist out of the lab. It shows a gross ignorance of history.

Dinesh D’Souza Interviewed by Marcia Segelstein,

…with a guy like Dawkins, you always have to pause because he knows so little about subjects outside of biology. In certain sectors of society, there’s an awed reverence of Dawkins because he is a very learned and eloquent defender of Darwinian evolution. He has explained it beautifully and written about it very well. We often forget that the guy is a biologist, however, who actually doesn’t know a whole lot about anything else.
His knowledge of history is poor; his knowledge of philosophy is abysmal; and his knowledge of theology is non-existent. When Dawkins wanders out of his field, he thus makes uninformed and often idiotic statements. So while in some ways I feel indignant about what he says, I also feel almost a sense of pity for him. The poor fellow is wandering around in intellectual fields where he is such an innocent.

richarddawkinsandatheismandatheistandnewatheis-6657087

H. Allen Orr (the Shirley Cox Kearns Professor of Biology at the University of Rochester),

…most scientists do not accept Dawkins’s theory of memes.3

Richard Lewontin (Professor of biology; evolutionary biologist and geneticist) writes that Richard Dawkins appears in Carl Sagan’s list of the “best contemporary science-popularizers” and is one who,

put unsubstantiated assertions or counterfactual claims at the very center of the stories they have retailed in the market.

Read the whole fascinating article and commentary: Billions and Billions of Demons and How Billions of Demons Haunted Baloney While Avoiding Detection

Anthony O’Hear (agnostic and philosopher) referring to Richard Dawkins,

…this particular Darwinian is quite unable to explain why we have an obligation to act against our “selfish” genes.4

Interview with Ben Stein from the movie Expelled – No Intelligence Allowed:

Ben Stein (BS) : “So you’re a science guy. Can you quantify your assertion that there is no god? I mean, how sure are you?”
Richard Dawkins (RD) : “I really don’t feel comfortable putting a number on it.”
BS, “Ninety-nine percent?”
RD, “Yes, I guess 99 percent.”
BS, “Why not 97?”
RD, “I suppose it could be 97. I’m not really-“
BS, “Well, if it could be 99 or 97.”
RD, “You said that. I don’t think it can be-“
BS, “-then why not 46 percent? 50 percent?”
RD, “I’m sure it’s more than 50 percent improbable.”
BS, “Well how do you know?”
RD, “I don’t know, I said that, I -“

See “Expelled Exposed” Exposed

By Richard Dawkins:

Justin Brierley: Ultimately, your belief that rape is wrong is as arbitrary as the fact that we’ve evolved five fingers rather than six.

Richard Dawkins: You could say that, yeah.5

richarddawkinsandatheismandatheistandnewatheist-8406914

…reports of child abuse cover a multitude of sins, from mild fondling to violent buggery…just because some pedophile assaults are violent and painful, it doesn’t mean that all are. A child too young to notice what is happening at the hands of a gentle pedophile will have no difficulty at all in noticing the pain inflicted by a violent one. Phrases like “predatory monster” are not discriminating enough, and are framed in the light of adult hang-ups.6

See Torture, the Hell of Atheism and the “Gentle Pedophile”

Referring to Rabbi Shmuley Boteach,

…you shriek like Hitler…You shriek and yell and rant like Hitler…you periodically rise to climaxes of shrieking rant, and that is just like Hitler.

See Hitler’s Rabbi.

Referring to evolutionists whom he considers creationist appeasers,

the Neville Chamberlain school of evolutionists.7

Referring to Pastor Ted Haggard’s church service,

Well, you’ve certainly very effective at what you do I mean you seem to have all the airs of, well, it almost reminded me, you must forgive me, of Nuremburg Rally_Dr. Goebbels would have been proud.

Can anyone say Reductio ad Hitlerum?

…nature is not cruel, only pitilessly indifferent. This is one of the hardest lessons for humans to learn. We cannot admit that things might be neither good nor evil, neither cruel nor kind, but simply callous-indifferent to all suffering, lacking all purpose.8

Does the embryo suffer? (Presumably not if it is aborted before it has a nervous system; and even if it is old enough to have a nervous system it surely suffers less than, say, an adult cow in a slaughterhouse.)…
if late-aborted embryos with nervous systems suffer – though all suffering is deplorable – it is not because they are human that they suffer. There is no general reason to suppose that human embryos at any stage suffer more than cow or sheep embryos at the same developmental stage.9

How much do we regard children as being the property of their parents?” Dawkins asks. “It’s one thing to say people should be free to believe whatever they like, but should they be free to impose their beliefs on their children? Is there something to be said for society stepping in? What about bringing up children to believe manifest falsehoods?”10

Catholic child? Flinch. Protestant child? Squirm. Muslim child? Shudder. Everybody’s consciousness should be raised to this level_I could well imagine that this linguistically coded freedom to choose might lead children to choose no religion at all.11

richarddawkinsandatheismandatheistandnewatheist-1612723

…we are survival machines – robot vehicles blindly programmed to preserve the selfish molecules known as genes.

And from his “Christmas Lectures for Young People” (1991):

We are machines built by DNA whose purpose is to make more copies of the same DNA…It is every living object’s sole reason for living…that the purpose of all life is to pass on their DNA means that all living things are descended from a long line of successful ancestors…which can best be understood as fulfilling a purpose of propagating DNA…There is no purpose other than that.12

…how do I react to the idea of being a vehicle for DNA? It doesn’t sound very romantic, does it? It doesn’t sound the sort of vision of life that a poet would have; and I’m quite happy, quite ready to admit that when I’m not thinking about science I’m thinking in a very different way.13

What is a human? What is a human self, a human individual? That’s more difficult. It’s not a question I can answer – it’s not a question any scientist can answer at present, though I think they will. I believe it will turn out that what a human is, is some manifestation of brain stuff and its workings…”I’m certainly happy that we are a product of brains and that when our brains die, we disappear.14

Awe and wonder are things which religious people undoubtedly feel, but I get a bit irritated when they imply they have a monopoly of them. I think I can feel wonder at least as well as the next man, and I am stimulated to do so by contemplating the huge size and age of the universe, the immense range of sizes of things, from fundamental particles to galaxies, and the awe-inspiring consequences of evolution, starting from simple beginnings and working up to prodigies of complexity like ourselves.15

This is Neo-Pagan-Atheism

As an academic scientist I am a passionate Darwinian. But I am a passionate anti-Darwinian when it comes to politics and how we should conduct our human affairs.16

I see absolutely no reason why, understanding the way the world is, you therefore have to promote it. The darwinian world is a very nasty place: the weakest go to the wall. There’s no pity, no compassion. All those things I abhor, and I will work in my own life in the interests of thoroughly unDarwinian things like compassion.17

There is no logical connection between what is and what ought. Now, if you then ask me where I get my “ought” statements from, that’s a more difficult question. Firstly, I don’t feel so strongly about them. If I say something is wrong, like killing people, I don’t find that nearly such a defensible statement as “I am a distant cousin of an orangutan”. The second of those statements is true, I can tell you why it’s true, I can bore you to death telling you why it’s true. It’s definitely true. The statement “killing people is wrong”, to me, is not of that character. I would be quite open to persuasion that killing people is right in some circumstances.18

If somebody used my views to justify a completely self – centred lifestyle, which involved trampling all over other people in any way they chose roughly what, I suppose, at a sociological level social Darwinists did – I think I would be fairly hard put to it to argue on purely intellectual grounds. I think it would be more: “This is not a society in which I wish to live. Without having a rational reason for it necessarily, I’m going to do whatever I can to stop you doing this.”I couldn’t, ultimately, argue intellectually against somebody who did something I found obnoxious. I think I could finally only say, “Well, in this society you can’t get away with it’ and call the police.”

I realise this is very weak, and I’ve said I don’t feel equipped to produce moral arguments in the way I feel equipped to produce arguments of a cosmological and biological kind. But I still think it’s a separate issue from beliefs in cosmic truths.19

Larry Taunton interview, Richard Dawkins: The Atheist Evangelist,

“What is the objective of your anti-religious campaign?”
“‘I think my ultimate goal would be to convert people away from particular religions toward a rationalist skepticism, tinged with _ no, that’s too weak,’ he said, correcting himself, ‘… glorying in the universe and in life. Yes, I would like people to be converted away from religion to skepticism.'” [ellipses in original]

This is Neo-Pagan-Atheism again.

richarddawkinsandatheismandatheistandnewatheist-8991550

I’m actually rather interested in the shifting zeitgeist. If you travel anywhere in the Western world, you find a consensus of opinion which is recognizably different from what it was only a matter of a decade or two ago. You and I are both a part of that same zeitgeist, and [as to where] we get our moral outlook, one can almost use phrases like “it’s in the air.”

What’s to prevent us from saying Hitler wasn’t right? I mean, that is a genuinely difficult question.

“I [Larry Taunton] believe you can get your morality from the Bible.” “Well, which bits of the Bible?” His [Richard Dawkins’] eyes flashed. “Presumably not Leviticus and Numbers and Deuteronomy?” As I began to explain the function of Old Testament law, Dawkins pounced. “You’re not telling me that as a civilized 21st-century man that you get your morality from the Ten Commandments?”

Can you say argument from outrage, argument for ridicule and argument from embarrassment?

Biology is the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose.20

I won’t debate creationists.

Interview with Jonathan Miller who asked for Richard Dawkins’ “most persuasive” argument for evolution through natural selection:

Um, there’s got to be a series of advantages all the way in the feather. If you can’t think of one then that’s your problem, not natural selection’s problem. Natural selection, um, well, I suppose that is a sort of matter of faith on my, on my part since the theory is so coherent and so powerful…

Jonathan Miller: “So when, at the age of 16, you became acquainted with Darwin, was it because you were taught about Darwin, or you began reading The Origin of Species?”

Richard Dawkins “No, it was because I was taught.”21

Chance, luck, coincidence, miracle…events that we commonly call miracles are not supernatural, but are part of a spectrum of more-or-less improbable natural events. A miracle, in other words, if it occurs at all, is a tremendous stroke of luck.22

It is as though, in our theory of how we came to exist, we are allowed to postulate a certain ration of luck.23

Could it be that our Good Samaritan urges are misfirings, analogous to the misfiring of a reed warbler’s parental instincts when it works itself to the bone for a young cuckoo? An even closer analogy is the human urge to adopt a child…
I must rush to add that “misfiring” is intended only in a strictly Darwinian sense. It carries no suggestion of the pejorative. The “mistake” or “by-product” idea, which I am espousing, works like this. Natural selection…programmed into our brains altruistic urges, alongside sexual urges, hunger urges, xenophobic urges and so on.24

Jewish / Judaism : List of Old Testament Texts Applied to the Messiah in Rabbinic Writings

This essay is a succinct presentation of the research published in Alfred Edersheim’s 1883 book “The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah.” I have limited the quotation to the mention of the Biblical texts that are applied to the Messiah. By consulting Alfred Edersheim’s book (or the online reproduction) you can also find in which Rabbinic writings these texts are mentioned. Below we also include Risto Santala’s comments on Christ’s life in the Psalms.

Alfred Edersheim wrote:

The following list contains the passages in the Old Testament applied to the Messiah or to Messianic times in the most ancient Jewish writings. They amount in all to 456, thus distributed: 75 from the Pentateuch, 243 from the Prophets, and 138 from the Hagiographa, and supported by more than 558 separate quotations from Rabbinic writings_

The Rabbinic works from which quotations have been made are: the Targumim, the two Talmuds, and the most ancient Midrashim_I have, however, frequently quoted from the well-known work Yalkut, because, although of comparatively late date, it is really, as its name implies, a collection and selection from more than fifty older and accredited writings_

And if any student should arrive at a different conclusion from mine in regard to any of the passages hereafter quoted, I can at least assure him that mine is the result of the most careful and candid study I could give to the consideration of each passage. With these prefatory remarks I proceed to give the list of Old Testament passages Messianically applied in ancient Rabbinic writings.1

jesusandcrucifixionandarcheologyandbible-8176201

From the Old Testament-the Tanakh:
Genesis 1:2; 2:4; 3:15; 4:25; 8:11; 9:27; 14:1; 15:18; 18:4-5; 19:32; 22:18; 33:1; 35:21; 38:1-2; 49:1, 9-10, 12, 19.

Exodus 4:22; 12:2, 42; 15:1; 16:25, 33; 17:16; 21:1; 40:9, 11.

Leviticus 26:13

Numbers 7:12; 23:21; 24:7, 17; 27:16.

Deuteronomy 1:8; 11:21; 16:3; 19:8-9; 20:10; 23:11; 25:19; 30:4; 32:7; 33:5, 12, 17.

Judges 5:31.

Ruth 1:1; 2:14; 3:15; 4:18, 20.

1st Samuel 2:10.

2nd Samuel 22:28; 23:1-4.

1st Kings 4:33.

1st Chronicles 3:24.

Psalms 2:1-2, 4, 6-9; 16:5, 9; 18:31, 50; 21:1, 3-5, 7; 22:7, 15; 23:5; 31:19; 36:9; 40:7; 45:2-3, 6-7; 50:2; 60:7; 61:6, 8; 68:31; 72:1, 8, 10, 16-17; 80:17; 89:22-25, 27, 51, 53; 90:15; 92:8, 11, 13; 95:7; 102:16; 106:44; 110:1, 2, 7; 116:9, 13; 119:33; 120:7; 121:1; 126:2; 132:18; 133:3; 142:5.

Ecclesiastes 1:9, 11; 7:24; 11:8; 12:1.

Canticle of Canticles (Song of Songs) 1:8; 2:8; 3:11; 4:5, 16; 5:10; 6:10; 7:6, 13; 8:12, 4, 11.

Isaiah 1:25, 26; 2:4; 4:2, 4-6; 6:13; 7:21; 8:14; 9:6; 10:27, 34; 11:1, 3-7, 11-12; 12:3; 14:2, 29; 15:2; 16:1, 5; 18:5; 21:11-12; 23:8, 15; 24:23; 25:8-9; 26:19; 27:10, 13; 28:5, 16; 30:18-19, 25-26; 32:14-15, 20; 35:1, 5-6, 10; 40:1-3, 5, 10; 41:18, 25; 42:1; 43:10; 45:22; 49:8-10, 12, 14, 21, 23, 26; 51:12, 17; 52:3, 7-8, 12-13; 53:5, 10; 54:2, 5, 11, 13; 55:12; 56:1, 7; 57:14, 16; 59:15, 17, 19-20; 60:1-5, 7-10, 19, 21-22; 62:10; 63:2, 4; 64:4; 65:17, 19, 25; 66:7; 68:22.

Jeremiah 3:17-18; 5:19; 12:9; 16:13-14; 23:5-7; 30:21;
31:8, 20, 31, 33-34; 33:13.

Lamentations 1:16; 2:22; 4:22.

Ezekiel 11:19; 16:55; 17:22-23; 25:14; 29:21; 32:14; 36:25, 27; 39:2; 47:9, 12; 48:19.

Daniel 2:22, 35; 7:9, 13, 27; 8:13-14; 9:24; 12:3, 11-12.

Hosea 2:2, 13, 18; 3:5; 6:2; 13:14; 14:7.

Joel 2:28; 3:18.

Amos 4:7; 5:18; 8:11; 9:11.

Obadiah v.18, 21.

Micah 2:13; 4:3; 5:2-3; 7:6, 8.

Nahum 2:1.

Habakkuk 2:3; 3:18.

Zephaniah 3:8-9.

Zechariah 1:20; 2:10; 3:8, 10; 4:7, 10; 6:12; 7:13; 8:12, 23; 9:1, 9-10; 10:4; 11:12; 12:10; 14:2-9.

Malachi 3:1, 4, 16; 4:1-2, 5.

jesusandcrucifixionandarcheologyandbible-8618096

From the Apocryphal Books:
Tobit 14:5-7.

Wisdom of Solomon 3:7-8.

Ecclesiasticus a.k.a. Sirach (not to be confused with Ecclesiastes) 44:21; 47:11; 48:10-11.

Baruch 2:34-35; 4:29; Ch. 5.

1st Maccabees 2:57.

2nd Maccabees 2:18.

Gentile scholar Risto Santala notes:

The New Testament expounds virtually the whole history of salvation in the light of the Psalms.

Christ was despised, Ps. 22:6, 69:19-22;

he was rejected, Ps. 118:22;

he was mocked, Ps. 22:7-8, 89:51-52;

he was whipped, Ps. 129:3;

he was derided, Ps. 69:8,20;

he was impaled on a cross, Ps. 22:1-2, 14-17;

he was thirsty, Ps. 22:16;

he was given wine mixed with gall on the cross, Ps. 69:20-22;

lots were cast for his garments, Ps. 22:18-19;

his bones were not broken, Ps. 34:21;

he rose from the dead, Ps.16:10;

he ascended to heaven, Ps. 68:19;

he is at the right hand of God, Ps. 110:1 and 80:17;

he is the High Priest, Ps. 110:4;

he will judge the nations, Ps. 89:3-5;

his reign is eternal, Ps. 89:35-37;

he is the son of God, Ps. 2:7;

he spoke in parables, Ps. 78:2;

he calmed the storm, Ps. 89:10;

the people sang Hosanna to him, Ps. 118:25-26;

he is blessed forever, Ps. 45:1-4,8,18;

and he will come in his glory in the Last Days, Ps. 102:16-23.2

Judaism (Rabbinic, Messianic, etc.)

CHRISTIANITY
Christianity

Christian Apologetics

Bible

God – Theology

Problem of Evil – Theodicy

Jesus

Nephilim – Giants

Book of Enoch

Serpent Seed

Satanic Serpent & Dragon

Angels

Cherubim & Seraphim

Satan / Devil

Demons

Miracles

Inspirational

Unbelievers Compliment Christianity

Da Vinci Code / Angels and Demons / Templars, etc.

Gospel of Judas

The Lost Tomb of Jesus

————-
ATHEISM
Atheism

New Atheists

Project-Answering Atheism

Richard Dawkins

Sam Harris

Christopher Hitchens

Dan Barker

Daniel Dennett

Bart Ehrman

Bill Maher

PZ Myers

Quentin Smith

Michael Shermer

John Loftus

Ricky Gervais

Raphael Lataster

Carl Sagan

Atheism’s Public Relations Problems

Atheist Bus Ads and Billboards

Atheist Child Rearing

Atheist Charity

American Atheists

American Humanist Association

The Skeptic Arena

ExChristian.Net

PositiveAtheism.org

Evilbible.com

Science Club of Long Island

Skeptic’s Annotated Bible

Capella’s Guide to Atheism

The BOBA Digest

————-
RELIGIONS
Judaism (Rabbinic, Messianic, etc.)

Baha’i

Islam

Jehovah’s Witnesses

Mormonism

Catholicism

Scientology – Dianetics – L. Ron Hubbard

Unitarian Universalism

Misc. Religions

————-
FRINGE-OLOGY
Transhumanism

UFOs and Aliens

Billy Meier

Whitley Strieber

Robert Temple-Sirius Mystery

Conspiracy theories, Illuminati, New World Order (NWO), etc.

Occult, Witchcraft, Magick, satanism, etc.

Satanic Crime

————-
SCIENCE
Science

Creation Science

Intelligent Design

Cosmology

Evolution

The Wedgie Document

————-
MOVIES & TV SHOWS

Movies

Alchemical Hollywood

Transhuman Hollywood

————-
MISC.
Adolf Hitler / Nazism / Communism

The Crusades

Morality / Ethics

Abortion

Rape

Meaning and Purpose

Homosexuality

Postgender Androgyny, Hermaphroditism & Beyond

Debates

Pop Culture and Politics

————-
RESOURCES
Fitness

Audio

Books

TFT essay “Books”

Debate

Links

Video

Find it Fast – Fast Facts

Visuals – Illustrations and Photos

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Essays by Various Authors Responding to Sam Harris

J. P. Holding
Letter to a Maladjusted Misotheist

Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists

Why the Burden of Proof is on the Atheist

The Atheism of the Gaps

Theism, Atheism, and Rationality

The Real Murderers: Atheism or Christianity?

The Godlessness that Failed

Is It Rational to Believe in God?

Henry SchusterSuicide Bombings as Military StrategyExpert: Attacks Motivated by Logic, Not Religion

Vox Day

God, George Bush and War

Vox Day

Godless Criminals

Vox Day

The Clowns of Reason Vox Day
The Clowns of Reason, II

The Clowns of Reason, III

Why Bertrand Russell Was Not A Christian

Answering Michael Martin’s

“Atheism, Christian Theism, and Rape”

Ayn Rand, 1905-1982

Answers to Atheists United

J.P. Holding and Contributors

You May be a Fundamentalist Atheist if…

Calculated Contempt:

Why Bible Critics Do Not Deserve the Benefit of the Doubt

A New Perspective on the Problem of Evil

The Holocaust:

Ideas and Their Consequences

A Reformed Response To Richard Dawkins

The Presumptuousness of Atheism

Is God Less Glorious Because He Ordained that Evil Be?

The Problem of Evil and The Cross of Christ

The Resurrection of Theism

Hume, Kant, and Rational Theism

Bob and Gretchen Passantino

Imagine There’s No Heaven:

Contemporary Atheism Speaks Out In Humanist Manifesto 2000

Bob and Gretchen Passantino

Atheism vs. Christianity,

A Response to Unanswered Questions

Atheism:

a Dialogue between Chuck Colson and An Atheist Friend

What if God Were Very Good?

Can You Prove That God Exists?

The Absurdity of Atheism

Is Christianity Unintelligible?

Are Secularist Claims About American History Reliable?

Atheism and Death:

Why the Atheist Must Face Death With Despair

Putting The Atheist on The Defensive,

Parts One and Two

A Conversation with an Atheist

The Enlightenment and Belief in God

Does God Exist?

Why Isn’t the Evidence Clearer?

Science & Religion:

Oil & Water?

(Leadership University Editor/Webmaster provides many recourses/links)

Retelling the Story of Science

Scientific Facts and Christian Faith:

How Are They Compatible?

The Real Issue: Is Science a Threat or Help to Faith?

A look at the concept of Theistic Science

Scientists and Their Gods also known as

Science and Christianity: Conflict or Coherence?)

The Democratization of Science

“The Lost Tomb of Jesus”, part 8 of 10

Some Academics Dare to Disagree:Let us consider some of the academics who are not considered in Simcha Jacobovici and DSC’s “all.”

Recall that in the section of this essay entitled Utterly Absolute Unquestionable Certainty I quoted Jacobovici’s website to the effect that “there is absolutely no academic dispute concerning the provenance of any of the inscriptions. Nor is there any question as to how they should be read.” And that DSC claimed that “All leading epigraphers agree about the inscriptions. All archaeologists confirm the nature of the find.”

Bar Ilan University’s Amos Kloner was,

“the first archaeologist to examine the site, said the idea fails to hold up by archaeological standards but makes for profitable television. ‘They just want to get money for it’_Kloner also said the filmmakers’ assertions are false. ‘The names on the caskets are the most common names found among Jews at the time.”1

Kloner also stated,

“It’s a beautiful story but without any proof whatsoever.”2

“Shimon Gibson, one of three archaeologists who first discovered the tomb in 1980, said Monday of the film’s claims: ‘I’m skeptical, but that’s the way I am. I’m willing to accept the possibility.”3

“Stephen Pfann, a biblical scholar at the University of the Holy Land in Jerusalem who was interviewed in the documentary, said the film’s hypothesis holds little weight. Pfann is even unsure that the name ‘Jesus’ on the caskets was read correctly. He thinks it’s more likely the name ‘Hanun.’ Ancient Semitic script is notoriously difficult to decipher.”4

map-5783062

“William Dever, an expert on near eastern archaeology and anthropology, who has worked with Israeli archeologists for five decades, said specialists have known about the ossuaries for years. ‘The fact that it’s been ignored tells you something,’ said Dever, professor emeritus at the University of Arizona. ‘It would be amusing if it didn’t mislead so many people.'”5

Ben Witherington is the author of “What Have they Done With Jesus?” and he was involved in DSC’s special on the James ossuary that was produced by Smicha Jacobovici about whom Witherington had the following to say

“He is a good film maker, and he knows a good sensational story when he sees one. This is such a story. Unfortunately it is a story full of holes, conjectures, and problems. It will make good TV and involves a bad critical reading of history. Basically this is old news with a new interpretation. We have known about this tomb since it was discovered in 1980. There are all sorts of reasons to see this as much ado about nothing much.”6

Ben Witherington then enumerates various problems with the documentary’s various assertions (please see his website for these).

Richard Dawkins

Is Richard Dawkins after your children?

Is Richard Dawkins insulting and pseudo intellectual?

Is Richard Dawkins Still Alive?

Is the Atheist Argument from Religious Violence Cogent?

Jacques Ellul’s advice to Dawkins, Hawking, Harris, deGrasse Tyson & Nye

Kavorkatheism: on “elevatorgate” – misogynism and sexism in atheism

Lawrence Krauss “can’t prove that God doesn’t exist”

Look Both Ways Two Atheistic Logical Fallacies

Memetic Mesmerism and Eumemics

Michael Shermer – Moral Argument from Embarrassment

Michael Shermer – The Neglected New Atheist

Nancy Pelosi Preaches, Again—All Hail the Obama Theocracy

PZ Myers – The Desecration Delusion

PZ Myers – Transubstantiating from Scientist to New Atheist Activist

Question for atheists – is “God did it” a science stopper?, part 2 of 4

Question for atheists – is “God did it” a science stopper?, part 3 of 4

Question for atheists – is “God did it” a science stopper?, part 4 of 4

Question for atheists: is “God did it” a science stopper?

Question for atheists: is “God did it” a science stopper?, part 1 of 4

Religious parents’ child rearing and Richard Dawkins’ interference

Resources Relating to Atheism

Richard Dawkins & John Maddox on Shattering the Myth of Darwinism

Richard Dawkins – Children in the Atheist’s Den (8 Part Series)

Richard Dawkins – Comfortably Numb

Richard Dawkins – Manipulating for Atheism

Richard Dawkins – On Abortion, Tadpoles, Rape, Cows, Murder and Sheep

Richard Dawkins – Planting God More Firmly on His Throne

Richard Dawkins – The Very Model of Restraint

Richard Dawkins : Planting God More Firmly on His Throne (10 Part Series)