This series, beginning at part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4, part 5, part 6, part 7 and part 8, is a consideration of the book Discerning Alien Disinformation written by Montalk. We will consider alien types and whether there are positive and negative ones. Montalk is not a Christian and is very insightful. There are areas of agreement as well as disagreement.
We come to a section wherein it is stated:
“By analyzing enough alien disinformation one can logically deduce the alien agenda….We can distinguish between positive aliens and impostors by knowing more about what each are truly like. What unique traits must aliens demonstrate in word, action, and consequence to qualify as truly benevolent?
We are looking for key characteristics of positive aliens that cannot be imitated by negative impostors, at least not without shortchanging their own agenda. Our standards must be set neither so low that impostors falsely qualify, nor so unrealistically high that benevolent groups with innocent shortcomings fail to qualify at all.”
Montalk notes that the “‘Core Deception’ contains the following key elements”:
“Misapplying spiritual principles…Framing alien interference in divine light or destiny…Demanding unification and integration of humans with aliens.”
One thing that aliens do is to puff up someone’s pride; as Montalk puts it, “abductees are made to feel special and chosen.” While there are myriads of example, let us consider one in the form of Billy Meier who claims that he is the contact person for the Plejarens and anyone who claims to be like him, such as anyone claiming to be in contact with Pleiadians, is a fraud as he writes about:
“the lies they spread regarding the contacts they were supposedly having with the Pleiadians [who spread] heinous lies and vicious fraud, for not one Pleiadian/Plejaran maintains contacts with human beings on Earth — except for me — a fact the Pleiadians/Plejarans have repeatedly and extensively emphasized throughout my many contact years with them…As the only true contactee of the Pleiadians.” (emphasis added)
You can learn all about the Billy Meier UFO alien contact case here.
Another point about the identity of aliens that some aliens may be “nonphysical pranksters playing with us” and another is based on a psyche-like-projection theories whereby our wills literally create reality:
“The ones that are strictly physical are more likely android facsimiles built by human military factions, while the strictly ethereal ones are negative thoughtforms or astral beings projecting that appearance…dynamic manifestations of our collective unconscious.”
Furthermore, he states:
“The Law of Attraction is a metaphysical principle stating that consciousness shapes probability, that what you mentally focus upon you pull into your life. This principle has been popularized in documentaries like The Secret (2006) and What the Bleep Do We Know? (2005).”
Well, the big secret is that which mystery religions, secret societies, occultism in general have always preached which is that there is no personal God but an impersonal energy (qi, ki, chi, prana, Vril, “The Force,” etc.) and that we can tap into this energy so as to manipulate it towards our ends via our will.
This has been expressed in esoteric texts, in Star Wars (The Force is tapped into by the Jedi for good and Sith for evil and yet, each thinks that they are good and the others evil because The Force is amoral), by the actor Will Smith (see video here) and as for What the Bleep Do We Know?, it is a New Age propaganda film starring a channeled being; Ramtha as channeled by J. Z. Knight (for elucidation see here and here).
On the good cop bad cop point we made earlier in this series, Montalk notes:
“Initially they [reptilians] would be better suited for playing the role of negative renegades to be scapegoated as the sole alien group coordinating negative abduction activities.”
Thus, as we noted in Green aliens –not little green men but environmental, the aliens can divide and conquer via ordo ab chao / order out of chaos, via the Hegelian Dialectic, in order to establish an alien new world order. In envisaging a possible takeover scenario, Montalk speculate that as “the world unites”:
“All science and religion are absorbed into a single alien paradigm. Stubborn religious and political factions refusing conformity are declared ignorant, obsolete, and dangerous.
Worldwide, pro-alien fanaticism leads to the persecution of dissenters. Anyone opposing conformity to the alien agenda is lumped into the same category as anti-alien terrorists, backward religious fundamentalists, and remnants of the old order attempting to undermine the alien occupation.”
When it comes to some “Shared Traits,” Montalk mentions something we covered in On the litigious nature of alien interaction:
“Either may respect freewill, stepping in only when asked. The difference is that positive aliens respect it fully and demand it be an informed and sincere choice, while negative aliens only respect freewill as something to covertly manipulate into granting them permission and legalizing their subsequent takeover. Both might ask us for permission before opening full contact.”
Indeed, and historically such “permission” is a free will invitation to non-human beings to involve themselves in our lives—this is the classic nature of demonology. Even in the goofy movie Beetlejuice the main protagonist, a bio-exorcist, could not get involved until his name was stated.
But note that even supposedly positive aliens will do negative things:
“If an individual or society lacks the required maturity to handle the truth, positive aliens may resort to disguises, riddles, or silence instead of giving the truth and injuring the long-term outcome, thus they may seem unforthcoming or even dishonest if pushed. Likewise, they may allow a person to undergo grave suffering if absolutely necessary for their spiritual maturation.”
But if those are the actions of the positive aliens how can we really distinguish from the negative aliens?:
“this should not be confused with rationalizations employed by negative aliens to justify their torture tactics, which are sadistic means serving negative ends.”
Another way that Montalk recommends discerning which are “positive humanoid aliens” is that their “communications resound with truth” which, again, is subjective as it will resound with that which you already believe. These aliens:
“are good at encrypting deeper truths into what they say, truths that reveal themselves only in hindsight when one has finally matured enough to understand them.”
And this is what many Gnostics, New Agers, et al. say about their gobbledygook statement; if you do not understand them then you are not advanced enough to get it—it is not, wink wink nudge nudge, that they are actually speaking malarkey.
So, we can discern positive aliens by how they feel; resound with truth yet, he also notes:
“Impostors can induce a counterfeit sense of warmth in their targets that restricts awareness by making them think the impostor must be a positive being radiating good vibes. However, these seemingly positive emotions are merely induced chemical or hormonal responses that cloud judgment instead of sharpening it.
The genuine ones have a warmth that can be sensed without oneself necessarily being flooded with feelings, just as one can sense the heat of a fire without oneself being on fire; the impostors, however, figuratively ‘set one on fire’ with induced emotions.”
Furthermore:
“Positive beings…never appeal to your baser instincts or use ego hooks to coerce cooperation…Sometimes they are hesitant to speak much about their identity or origins, since it could lead to many problems including personality worship and the compromising of their safety.”
So, for their own reasons; positive aliens can be aloof and do many of the same things as negative aliens do. Montalk also notes that with positive aliens there “is room for error” as they have “limited their future sight” which is based on probabilities.
This is the issue with his positive and negative dichotomy; there are two side, each with an agenda, each willing to take some of the same actions and both towards whatever end they see fit. Surely, they both see themselves as the good guys and the others are the bag guys.
And it only gets worse from here as we will pick it up from this point in our next segment.