This series, beginning at part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4, part 5, part 6 and part 7, is a consideration of the book Discerning Alien Disinformation written by Montalk. We will consider alien types and whether there are positive and negative ones. Montalk is not a Christian and is very insightful. There are areas of agreement as well as disagreement.
In the previous segment we considered alien channeling and now we will consider another occult practice known as remote viewing (about which you can learn here).
Montalk notes:
“various researchers have used remote viewing to probe the nature of the alien presence…Remote viewers, even entire teams, are thus open to having their psychic line spliced by such disinformers and fed misleading impressions…The greatest weakness is assuming that remote viewing success is measured by its signal to noise ratio, which ignores the possibility of a strong but counterfeit signal. Even with subjectivity eliminated, what remains is no guarantee of being truthful.”
This is very interesting in that recently, due to having written a lot about the Billy Meier UFO alien case, some pointed out a challenge to reproduce the supposed evidence which includes tape recordings, videos, photos, etc. One example is the claim that Billy Meier traveled back in time and took a photo of a pterodactyl. Recently, Mark Snider, host of the Ohio Exopolitics internet/radio show affirmed his belief that the photo is evidence. Yet, it has been exposed that Meier simply opened up a book about dinosaurs and just took a photograph of one of the illustrations. In fact, many have discredited the evidence (find good examples here).
And yet, this is one the issue as even if it could be proved that the Billy Meier evidence is 100% reliable it does not change the fact that his alien contacts hold to very anti-Christian views and seek to establish an alien new world order—for details of this issue in general see Extra-terrestrial alien messages – how, what and how.
Whether channeler of remote viewer, if there be a difference:
“Their identity may become so heavily invested in being the contactee of a particular alien group that any suggestion of dishonest motivations by their alien contacts is subconsciously interpreted as an attack upon their very identity, which naturally provokes an irrational defense mechanism.”
Moreover:
“The audience must be convinced aliens are sending urgent messages to the world so that the content of the message influences their opinion about the nature of these aliens and what must be done. Disinformation sent by way of direct messages aim to distort public awareness of alien motivations and influence the audience into supporting certain actions and values that are beneficial to an agenda.”
And it goes round and round as the dots keep getting connected; The audience must be convinced aliens are sending urgent messages to the world and so, as we noted in the segment Green aliens –not little green men but environmental, they encourage us to be environmentally friendly and do away with corrupt and warring governments and thus, set us up for accepting a new world order; a one world religion which worships nature and a unified one world government.
In fact, one of what Montalk refers to as one of the key elements of the alien’s “Core Deception” is “Scapegoating corrupt human leadership.” By scapegoating corrupt humans, the aliens fill in the gap and play the part of the good cop:
“By scapegoating some human cabal as the sole problem, aliens preserve their image as being the logical solution. It would be more accurate to say that corrupt human elements have been colluding with negative alien factions to keep mankind from connecting with higher benevolent powers who support our spiritual liberation.”